사형제도의 합리적 대안에 관한 연구
A Study on the Reasonable Alternative of Death Penalty
0
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
There had been attempts to abolish the death penalty until the 17th National Assembly. On the other hand, the three Special Laws on Death Penalty Abolishment submitted to the 18th National Assembly are different from previous ones because the core of argument is not whether to keep the death penalty system or not. The key arguments of the new 3laws are the concept and the scope of life sentence, which will replace the death penalty if the death penalty would be abolished. It is judged that this is a desirable development reflecting the current situation because the death penalty has already become dead words. It is expected that there will be more vigorous and practical discussion on the alternatives of death penalty in the future; instead of the theoretical discussion on whether to keep the death penalty or not. In order to respond to recent trend, this study advances one more step from the existing examination on the validity of concrete basis claimed by the party who support the keeping of death penalty system and the party who support the abolishment of death penalty system. This study further tries to find the answer to the question asking what would be the most reasonable alternative to death penalty, if the death penalty system would be abolished. For this, the policy directions during the transition period of death penalty alternative;such as the decrease of crimes which would be sentenced of death penalty, the effect realization equivalent to the death penalty sentence suspension and the introduction of ‘absolute life sentence’ will be discussed and the issues will be drawn. As last, the discussion will close by suggesting the content of relative life sentence and the rational operation plan for the related requirement as the ultimate policy direction of the alternatives to the death penalty system.
Abstract
There had been attempts to abolish the death penalty until the 17th National Assembly. On the other hand, the three Special Laws on Death Penalty Abolishment submitted to the 18th National Assembly are different from previous ones because the core of argument is not whether to keep the death penalty system or not. The key arguments of the new 3laws are the concept and the scope of life sentence, which will replace the death penalty if the death penalty would be abolished. It is judged that this is a desirable development reflecting the current situation because the death penalty has already become dead words. It is expected that there will be more vigorous and practical discussion on the alternatives of death penalty in the future; instead of the theoretical discussion on whether to keep the death penalty or not. In order to respond to recent trend, this study advances one more step from the existing examination on the validity of concrete basis claimed by the party who support the keeping of death penalty system and the party who support the abolishment of death penalty system. This study further tries to find the answer to the question asking what would be the most reasonable alternative to death penalty, if the death penalty system would be abolished. For this, the policy directions during the transition period of death penalty alternative;such as the decrease of crimes which would be sentenced of death penalty, the effect realization equivalent to the death penalty sentence suspension and the introduction of ‘absolute life sentence’ will be discussed and the issues will be drawn. As last, the discussion will close by suggesting the content of relative life sentence and the rational operation plan for the related requirement as the ultimate policy direction of the alternatives to the death penalty system.
참고문헌 (27)
- 사형제도의 합리적 축소정비방안, "강석구", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2005)
- 김상겸, "생명권과 사형제도- 사형제도 존치론을 중심으로 -", 헌법학연구, 10(2), pp.221~261 (2004), 한국헌법학회
- 김용세, "일본의 사형제도 운영현황과 전망", 형사정책연구, 20(4), pp.199~228 (2009), 한국형사정책연구원
- 김인선, "韓國의 死刑執行 現況과 死刑制度 改善方向에 對한 再考 - 韓國의 死刑執行現況과 死刑代替刑의 檢討 -", 비교형사법연구, 6(1), pp.145~182 (2004), 한국비교형사법학회
- 박성철, "사형제도의 폐지와 대체형벌에 관한 소고", 형사정책연구, 21(4), pp.125~148 (2010), 한국형사정책연구원
- 박찬걸, "사면제도의 적절한 운영방안에 관한 연구 - 사면심사위원회 등에 의한 통제를 중심으로 -", 矯正硏究, 51, pp.253~279 (2011), 한국교정학회
- 박찬걸, "사형폐지론의 입장에서 바라본 사형제도", 한양법학, (30), pp.349~370 (2010), 한양법학회
- 배종대, "형법총론(제8전정판)" (2005), 홍문사
- 손동권, "사형폐지론에 대한 비판적 검토, In 한국형법학의 새로운 지평: 심온 김일수교수화갑기념논문집" (2006), 박영사
- 윤영철, "사형제도에 대한 헌법재판소 결정(2010. 2. 25, 2008헌가23)의 문제점과 사형제도 폐지에 관한 소고", 중앙법학, 12(3), pp.253~284 (2010), 중앙법학회
- 윤종행, "사형제도와 인간의 존엄성", 법학연구, 13(2), pp.79~95 (2003), 법학연구원
- 이덕인, "사형제도의 정당성에 대한 비판적 검토", 형사정책, 23(1), pp.277~300 (2011), 한국형사정책학회
- 이덕인, "중국 사형제도의 현상과 전망", 형사정책연구, 21(2), pp.351~378 (2010), 한국형사정책연구원
- 이덕인, "사형폐지의 정당성 - 사법살인과 오판에 의한 사형 -", 중앙법학, 12(2), pp.111~140 (2010), 중앙법학회
- 이보영, "死刑制度의 存廢와 그 現實的 代案", 법학연구, (25), pp.347~370 (2007), 한국법학회
- 이상돈, "사형폐지론의 이론과 정책, In 한국형법학의 새로운 지평: 심온 김일수교수화갑기념논문집" (2006), 박영사
- 이승준, "사형폐지와 ‘새로운’ 상대적 종신형의 채택", 법학연구, 17(3), pp.123~150 (2007), 법학연구원
- 이인영, "연쇄살인범에 대한 사형대체형으로서 종신형 도입에 관한 논의", 한림법학 FORUM, 15 (2004), 한림대학교 법학연구소
- 이호중, "사형수의 인권과 처우의 방향", 동아법학, (50), pp.231~258 (2011), 법학연구소
- 이훈동, "전환기의 한국 형법-사형제도의 새로운 시각-", 외법논집, (26), pp.431~446 (2007), 법학연구소
- 전지연, "大韓民國에서의 死刑制度", 비교형사법연구, 6(2-1), pp.43~58 (2004), 한국비교형사법학회
- 조국, "사형폐지를 위한 단계적 실천방안 제언", 한국인권사회복지학회 2008년도 춘계학술대회발표문 (2008), 한국인권사회복지학회
- 조균석, "사형확정자의 수용과 사형집행", 법학논집, 13(2), pp.51~67 (2009), 법학연구소
- 조병선, "사형존폐론의 ‘방법론적’ 재검토, In 한국형법학의 새로운 지평: 심온 김일수교수화갑기념논문집" (2006), 박영사
- 차형근, "사형제도의 존폐와 그 대안－절대적 종신형제도의 도입여부－", 형사법연구, (22) (2004), 한국형사법학회
- 하태훈, "한국에서의 사형집행유예제도에 관한 논의", 비교형사법연구, 9(2), pp.697~718 (2007), 한국비교형사법학회
- 허일태, "사형의 대안으로서 절대적 종신형 도입방안", 형사정책세미나 자료집 (2006), 한국형사정책연구원