번역강의실에서의 의사소통—석사과정생들의 번역브리프와 번역의 관계에 관한 실행연구
Translation Classroom Communication: An action-research based study on the relations between the translation briefs and translations of postgraduate students
0
조회
0
다운로드
12
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims to identify the notions postgraduate learners have on translation and observe how learners and teachers communicate in the classroom. Although the difference in one’s notion of translation will significantly affect the translation process and eventually the translation s/he produces, there has been a lack of discussion on this in the translation classroom. In particular, teachers and students have different notions of what translation is and, thus, do not share the same understanding on a given translation situation or a translation product. Naturally, this negatively affects the final translation products students produce as well as sets a ceiling as to what teachers and students can achieve in the classroom. To identify the notions students have on translation, ten learners were subjected to this study and divided into two groups. Each group was given a translation task with a different translation purpose—“translation pedagogy (professional translation according to Deisle 2002, 229)" and “pedagogical translation”—in order to identify what translation strategies learners use depending on a given translation purpose. For every translation assignment, students were instructed to submit translation briefs detailing the target readership, target text-type (or medium), translation purpose as well as the translation problems they identified along with the solutions they came up with. Based on their description, it was explored whether there were differences on their translation notion and whether such differences, if any, affected their translations. After the first assignment was completed, a second assignment was given to the students for which the translation purpose was switched between the two groups. In other words, the group that first worked on “translation pedagogy” switched to pedagogical translation, and vice versa. The analysis reveals that the translation briefs drawn up by students is a useful tool to better understand translation learners. The study also shows that producing different translations based on the same source text with different translation purposes can enhance student understanding of the translator’s role. Finally, having students practise translation by reflecting what has been discussed in the previous class helps the teacher identify whether the students have learned and, therefore, enables deeper understanding on the communication process in the translation classroom.
Abstract
This study aims to identify the notions postgraduate learners have on translation and observe how learners and teachers communicate in the classroom. Although the difference in one’s notion of translation will significantly affect the translation process and eventually the translation s/he produces, there has been a lack of discussion on this in the translation classroom. In particular, teachers and students have different notions of what translation is and, thus, do not share the same understanding on a given translation situation or a translation product. Naturally, this negatively affects the final translation products students produce as well as sets a ceiling as to what teachers and students can achieve in the classroom. To identify the notions students have on translation, ten learners were subjected to this study and divided into two groups. Each group was given a translation task with a different translation purpose—“translation pedagogy (professional translation according to Deisle 2002, 229)" and “pedagogical translation”—in order to identify what translation strategies learners use depending on a given translation purpose. For every translation assignment, students were instructed to submit translation briefs detailing the target readership, target text-type (or medium), translation purpose as well as the translation problems they identified along with the solutions they came up with. Based on their description, it was explored whether there were differences on their translation notion and whether such differences, if any, affected their translations. After the first assignment was completed, a second assignment was given to the students for which the translation purpose was switched between the two groups. In other words, the group that first worked on “translation pedagogy” switched to pedagogical translation, and vice versa. The analysis reveals that the translation briefs drawn up by students is a useful tool to better understand translation learners. The study also shows that producing different translations based on the same source text with different translation purposes can enhance student understanding of the translator’s role. Finally, having students practise translation by reflecting what has been discussed in the previous class helps the teacher identify whether the students have learned and, therefore, enables deeper understanding on the communication process in the translation classroom.
참고문헌 (24)
- 김정연, "번역교육과 교육에서의 번역" (2002), 고려대학교 출판부
- 신지선, "번역사의 커뮤니케이션 능력 -Translation Briefs(번역 의뢰사항)의 필요성을 중심으로", 통번역교육연구, 6(1), pp.37~53 (2008), 한국통번역교육학회
- 안인경, "번역교육과 교육에서의 번역" (2010), 한국외국어대학교
- 이상원, "한국 출판 번역 독자들의 번역 평가 규범 연구" (2006), 한국학술정보(주)
- 이명숙, "실행연구(Action Research)를 통한 교육 실제의 개선", 대구교육대학교 초등교육연구논총, 17(2), pp.381~408 (2001)
- 이용숙, "교육현장 개선과 함께 하는 실행연구방법" (2005), 학지사
- 전성기, "번역인문학과 번역비평" (2008), 고려대학교 출판부
- 정연일, "번역수업에 있어서 ‘번역브리프’의 역할", 한국외국어대학교 통역번역연구소 논문집, 7, pp.171~186 (2003)
- Munday, Jeremy, "번역학입문-이론과 적용" (2006), 한국외국어대학교
- 남원준, "번역사와 번역학 - 소통의 시도" (2009), 한국외대출판부
- 주진국, "번역행위의 목적성" (2006), 한국외국어대학교 출판부
- 정혜용, "번역논쟁" (2011), 열린책들
- Adab, Beverly, "Evaluating competence, In Developing translation competence", pp.215~228 (2000), John Benjamins
- Fraser, Janet, "The broader view: How freelance translators define translation competence, In Developing translation competence", pp.51~62 (2000), John Benjamins
- Harvey, K, "Compensation and the brief in a non-literary translation: Theorical Implications and Pedagogical Application", Target, 10(2), pp.267~290 (1998)
- Hatim, Basil, "Teaching and Researching Translation" (2001), Pearson Educational Limitted
- Nord, Christiane, "Translation as A Process if Linguistic and Cultural", Teaching translating and interpreting, 4, pp.59~86 (1994)
- Orozco, Mariana, "Building a Mesuring Instrument", Developing Translation Competence (2000)
- Pym. Anthony, "Translation Error Analysis and the Interface with Language Teaching", The Teaching of Translation, pp.279~288 (1992)
- Sager, Juan, "Language Engineering and translation: consequences of automation", pp.151~ (1994), John Benjamins
- Vermeer, Hans, "Skopos and commission in translational action, In Translation Studies Reader", pp.221~232 (2000)
- Vienne, Jean, "Towards a Pedagogy of Translation in Situation", Perspective, pp.51~59 (1994)
- Zhong, Yong, "Plan-based translation assessment an alternative to the standard-based cut-the-feet-to-fit-the-shoes style of assessment", Meta, 50(4) (2005)
- 袁芳遠, "成功之道", pp.25~26 (2005), 북경대학출판사
