공공 서사와 뉴스 번역: 한일갈등서사의 라벨링 프레이밍 분석을 중심으로
Public Narrative and News Translation: Focusing on the Labeling Framing Analysis of the Korean-Japanese Conflict Narrative
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The so-called past history problems, such as comfort women and forced labors, are representative conflict narratives that are reproduced in different collective memories by the interpretive communities of Korea and Japan. This conflict narrative is formed on the basis of the sharp differences in perceptions between the two countries over the personality and identity of comfort women and forced labors. The most explicit indication of the difference between the two countries' perspectives on the narrative of conflict is the expression that refers to the core elements of the narrative, such as comfort women (character) and forced labors suits (event). Korean media reports comfort women as ‘victims of comfort women’, while Japanese media refer to comfort women as ‘former comfort women’(‘元慰安婦’). The lawsuit for forced labors is also reported by the Korean media as a ‘victims of forced labor’ lawsuit, and the Japanese media as a ‘former forced labors’ lawsuit (‘元徴用工’訴訟). In this way, in order to induce a preferred reading to the interpretive community, a specific directive expression is deliberately selected (in Korea, the expression ‘victim’ is added) or excluded (in Japan, the expression ‘victim’ is excluded) or alleviated (‘sex slaves’ is euphemistically expressed in ‘comfort women’) Baker (2006) describes the narrative device to be used in terms of labeling framing. As Von Borries emphasized, winners and losers, perpetrators and victims, descendants of the rich and poor remember and digest certain events or history in contrasting ways (2009:198-203). The purpose of this study is to analyze news reports and Korean-Japanese translations of issues of the conflict between Korea and Japan based on the narrative concept of Mona Baker (2016). Specifically, we will clarify how the Korean and Japanese governments are using labeling framing to solidify the issue of past history as a dominant public narratives, and examine how labeling framing used at the national level affects the journalism reporting practices of the media in both countries. Finally, we examine how the translator mediates and negotiates the incommensurability between the public narratives of their own country (Korea) and the public narrative of the target language culture area (Japan) through analysis of labeling translation.
Abstract
The so-called past history problems, such as comfort women and forced labors, are representative conflict narratives that are reproduced in different collective memories by the interpretive communities of Korea and Japan. This conflict narrative is formed on the basis of the sharp differences in perceptions between the two countries over the personality and identity of comfort women and forced labors. The most explicit indication of the difference between the two countries' perspectives on the narrative of conflict is the expression that refers to the core elements of the narrative, such as comfort women (character) and forced labors suits (event). Korean media reports comfort women as ‘victims of comfort women’, while Japanese media refer to comfort women as ‘former comfort women’(‘元慰安婦’). The lawsuit for forced labors is also reported by the Korean media as a ‘victims of forced labor’ lawsuit, and the Japanese media as a ‘former forced labors’ lawsuit (‘元徴用工’訴訟). In this way, in order to induce a preferred reading to the interpretive community, a specific directive expression is deliberately selected (in Korea, the expression ‘victim’ is added) or excluded (in Japan, the expression ‘victim’ is excluded) or alleviated (‘sex slaves’ is euphemistically expressed in ‘comfort women’) Baker (2006) describes the narrative device to be used in terms of labeling framing. As Von Borries emphasized, winners and losers, perpetrators and victims, descendants of the rich and poor remember and digest certain events or history in contrasting ways (2009:198-203). The purpose of this study is to analyze news reports and Korean-Japanese translations of issues of the conflict between Korea and Japan based on the narrative concept of Mona Baker (2016). Specifically, we will clarify how the Korean and Japanese governments are using labeling framing to solidify the issue of past history as a dominant public narratives, and examine how labeling framing used at the national level affects the journalism reporting practices of the media in both countries. Finally, we examine how the translator mediates and negotiates the incommensurability between the public narratives of their own country (Korea) and the public narrative of the target language culture area (Japan) through analysis of labeling translation.
참고문헌 (35)
- 강인규, "미디어 기호학" (2006), 소명출판
- 김경모, "내러티브 프레임과 해석 공동체: ‘전작권 환수 논란’의 프레임 경쟁과 해석 집단의 저널리즘 담론", 한국언론정보학보, 57(1), pp.109~136 (2012), 한국언론정보학회
- 김희범, "한국과 일본 신문의 ‘일본군 위안부’ 보도 프레임 유형 특성 연구", 미디어, 젠더 & 문화, 31(2), pp.81~123 (2016), 한국여성커뮤니케이션학회
- 반 다이크, "미디어 담론", pp.27~83 (2004), 커뮤니케이션북스
- 보도 폰 보리스, "역사 화해를 위한 역사교육 : 독일 관점에서의 이론적 고찰과 실제 경험", 역사 대화로 열어가는 동아시아 역사 화해: 제1회 동아시아 역사 화해 국제포럼, pp.189~231 (2009), 동북아역사재단
- 스튜어트 앨런, "미디어 담론", pp.134~179 (2004), 커뮤니케이션북스
- 이광수, "서울시 무상급식 정책결정과정에 대한 비판적 담론 분석", 교원교육, 29(3), pp.177~196 (2013), 교육연구원
- 이지영, "일본 사회의 일본군위안부문제에 대한 담론의 고찰", 한국정치학회보, 47(5), pp.407~429 (2013), 한국정치학회[DOI]
- 이은주, "한국 공적 연금 개혁에 관한 연구:기초연금개혁 담론 분석을 중심으로", 박사, pp.2015
- 이원표, "대중매체 담화 분석" (2004), 한국문화사
- 이화준, "한국과 일본의 선택된 기억과 피해자의식 : 양국의 기념관을 중심으로", 사회과학논집, 45(1), pp.1~24 (2014), 사회과학연구소
- 전재호, "한국의 반일(反日) 민족주의 연구: 담론의 변화와 특징", 한국과 국제정치, 35(2), pp.113~147 (2019), 극동문제연구소[DOI]
- 허경, "미셸 푸코의 ‘담론’ 개념 — ‘에피스테메’와 ‘진리놀이’의 사이 —", 개념과 소통, (9), pp.5~32 (2012), 한림과학원[DOI]
- 홍하은, "집단적 기억의 정치적 관리-한일 갈등 이슈를 둘러싼 미디어 담론분석을 중심으로", 한일관계사연구, (47), pp.235~276 (2014), 한일관계사학회
- Baker, Mona, "Translation and Conflict : A Narrative Account" (2006), Routledge
- Baker, Mona, "Translation and Conflict: A Narrative Account" (2018), Routledge
- Baker, Mona, "Narratives of Terrorism and Security: “Accurate” Translations, Suspicious Frames", Critical Studies on Terrorism, 3(3), pp.347~364 (2010)
- Barker, Chris, "Cultural studies and discourse analysis: A dailogue on language and identity" (2001), Sage
- Barthes, Ronald, "Image-Music-Text" (1977), Fontana
- Baquedano-López, "Creating Social Identities through Doctirina Narratives", Issues in Applied Longuistics, 8(1), pp.27~45 (2001)
- Bennett, W. Lance, "Toward a New Political Narrative", journal of Communication, 35(4), pp.156~171 (1985)
- Briggs, Charles, "Disorderly Discourse: Narrative, Conflict, and Social inequality" (1996), Oxford U. P
- Chandler, Daniel, "Semiotics: the basics" (2007), Routledge
- Fairclough, Norman, "Analyzing discourse: Textual analysis for social research" (2003), Routldge
- Fish, Stanley, "Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities" (1980), Harvard U. P
- Fisher, Walter R., "Human communication as narration: Toward a philosophy of reason, value, and action" (1987), University of South Carolina Press
- Kirkscey, Russell, "From homo narrans to homo attendens: A revision of the narrative paradigm", Conference Papers, Pennsylvania: National Communication Association (2008)
- Kuypers, Jim A., "Rhetorical Criticism: Perspectives in Action", pp.181~204 (2009), Lexington Books
- Mishler, Elliot G., "Models of Narrative Analysis: A Typology", Journal of Narrative and LIfe History, 5(2), pp.87~123 (1995)
- Rose, Gillian, "Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to the Interpretation of Visual Materials" (2001), Sage
- Somers, Margaret, "Narrativity, Narrative Identity, and Social Action: Rethinking English Working-Class Formation", Social Science History, 16(4), pp.591~630 (1992)
- Voloshinov, Valentin N., "Marxim and the Philosophy of Language" (1973), seminar Press
- White, Hayden, "The Value of Narrativity in the Representation of Reality", Critial Inquiry, 7(1) (1987)
- Wodak, Ruth, "Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis" (2008), Sage
- 高橋哲哉, "내셔널 히스토리를 넘어서" (2002), 삼인