Mechanical analysis of conventional and small diameter conical implant abutments
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. The aim of the present study was to evaluate if a smaller morse taper abutment has a negative effect on the fracture resistance of implant-abutment connections under oblique compressive loads compared to a conventional abutment. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Twenty morse taper conventional abutments (4.8 mm diameter) and smaller abutments (3.8 mm diameter) were tightened (20 Ncm) to their respective implants (3.5 * 11 mm) and after a 10 minute interval, implant/abutment assemblies were subjected to static compressive test, performed in a universal test machine with 1 mm/min displacement, at 45 degree inclination. The maximum deformation force was determined. Data were statistically analyzed by student t test. RESULTS. Maximum deformation force of 4.8 mm and 3.8 mm abutments was approximately 95.33 kgf and 95.25 kgf, respectively, but no fractures were noted after mechanical test. Statistical analysis demonstrated that the evaluated abutments were statistically similar (P=.230). CONCLUSION. Abutment measuring 3.8 mm in diameter (reduced) presented mechanical properties similar to 4.8 mm (conventional) abutments, enabling its clinical use as indicated.
Abstract
PURPOSE. The aim of the present study was to evaluate if a smaller morse taper abutment has a negative effect on the fracture resistance of implant-abutment connections under oblique compressive loads compared to a conventional abutment. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Twenty morse taper conventional abutments (4.8 mm diameter) and smaller abutments (3.8 mm diameter) were tightened (20 Ncm) to their respective implants (3.5 * 11 mm) and after a 10 minute interval, implant/abutment assemblies were subjected to static compressive test, performed in a universal test machine with 1 mm/min displacement, at 45 degree inclination. The maximum deformation force was determined. Data were statistically analyzed by student t test. RESULTS. Maximum deformation force of 4.8 mm and 3.8 mm abutments was approximately 95.33 kgf and 95.25 kgf, respectively, but no fractures were noted after mechanical test. Statistical analysis demonstrated that the evaluated abutments were statistically similar (P=.230). CONCLUSION. Abutment measuring 3.8 mm in diameter (reduced) presented mechanical properties similar to 4.8 mm (conventional) abutments, enabling its clinical use as indicated.
참고문헌 (9)
- Steinebrunner L, "Implant-abutment interface design affects fatigue and fracture strength of implants", Clin Oral Implants Res, 19, pp.1276~1284 (2008)
- Bozkaya D, "Mechanics of the taper integrated screwedin(TIS) abutments used in dental implants", J Biomech, 38, pp.87~97 (2005)
- Coppede∧ AR, "Fracture resistance of the implant-abutment connection in implants with internal hex and internal conical connections under oblique compressive loading: an in vitro study", Int J Prosthodont, 22, pp.283~286 (2009)
- Norton MR, "An in vitro evaluation of the strength of a 1-piece and 2-piece conical abutment joint in implant design", Clin Oral Implants Res, 11, pp.458~464 (2000)
- Reddy MS, "Initial clinical efficacy of 3-mm implants immediately placed into function in conditions of limited spacing", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 23, pp.281~288 (2008)
- Khraisat A, "Fatigue resistance of two implant", abutment joint designs, 2002, pp.88, 604~610
- Weigl P., "New prosthetic restorative features of Ankylos implant system", J Oral Implantol, 30, pp.178~188 (2004)
- Perriard J, "Fatigue resistance of ITI implant-abutment connectors - a comparison of the standard cone with a novel internally keyed design", Clin Oral Implants Res, 13, pp.542~549 (2002)
- Okeson JP, "Management of temporomandibular disorders and occlusion. 4thed", pp.44~ (1998), Mosby