Marginal fit of anterior 3-unit fixed partial zirconia restorations using different CAD/CAM systems
2
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. Few studies have investigated the marginal accuracy of 3-unit zirconia fixed partial dentures (FPDs) fabricated by computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) system. The purpose of this study was to compare the marginal fit of zirconia FPDs made using two CAD/CAM systems with that of metalceramic FPDs. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Artificial resin maxillary central and lateral incisors were prepared for 3-unit FPDs and fixed in yellow stone. This model was duplicated to epoxy resin die. On the resin die, 15 three-unit FPDs were fabricated per group (45 in total): Group A, zirconia 3-unit FPDs made with the Everest system; Group B, zirconia 3-unit FPDs made with the Lava system; and Group C, metal-ceramic 3-unit FPDs. They were cemented to resin dies with resin cement. After removal of pontic, each retainer was separated and observed under a microscope (Presize 440C). Marginal gaps of experimental groups were analyzed using oneway ANOVA and Duncan test. RESULTS. Mean marginal gaps of 3-unit FPDs were 60.46 μm for the Everest group, 78.71 μm for the Lava group, and 81.32 μm for the metal-ceramic group. The Everest group demonstrated significantly smaller marginal gap than the Lava and the metal-ceramic groups (P<.05). The marginal gap did not significantly differ between the Lava and the metal-ceramic groups (P>.05). CONCLUSION. The marginal gaps of anterior 3-unit zirconia FPD differed according to CAD/CAM systems, but still fell within clinically acceptable ranges compared with conventional metal-ceramic restoration.
Abstract
PURPOSE. Few studies have investigated the marginal accuracy of 3-unit zirconia fixed partial dentures (FPDs) fabricated by computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) system. The purpose of this study was to compare the marginal fit of zirconia FPDs made using two CAD/CAM systems with that of metalceramic FPDs. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Artificial resin maxillary central and lateral incisors were prepared for 3-unit FPDs and fixed in yellow stone. This model was duplicated to epoxy resin die. On the resin die, 15 three-unit FPDs were fabricated per group (45 in total): Group A, zirconia 3-unit FPDs made with the Everest system; Group B, zirconia 3-unit FPDs made with the Lava system; and Group C, metal-ceramic 3-unit FPDs. They were cemented to resin dies with resin cement. After removal of pontic, each retainer was separated and observed under a microscope (Presize 440C). Marginal gaps of experimental groups were analyzed using oneway ANOVA and Duncan test. RESULTS. Mean marginal gaps of 3-unit FPDs were 60.46 μm for the Everest group, 78.71 μm for the Lava group, and 81.32 μm for the metal-ceramic group. The Everest group demonstrated significantly smaller marginal gap than the Lava and the metal-ceramic groups (P<.05). The marginal gap did not significantly differ between the Lava and the metal-ceramic groups (P>.05). CONCLUSION. The marginal gaps of anterior 3-unit zirconia FPD differed according to CAD/CAM systems, but still fell within clinically acceptable ranges compared with conventional metal-ceramic restoration.
참고문헌 (34)
- Sorensen JA, "A rationale for comparison of plaque-retaining properties of crown systems", J Prosthet Dent, 62, pp.264~269 (1989)
- Sorensen SE, "Gingival and alveolar bone reaction to marginal fit of subgingival crown margins", Scand J Dent Res, 94, pp.109~114 (1986)
- Abbate MF, "Comparison of the marginal fit of various ceramic crown systems", J Prosthet Dent, 61, pp.527~531 (1989)
- Yeo IS, "In vitro marginal fit of three all-ceramic crown systems", J Prosthet Dent, 90, pp.459~464 (2003)
- Gonzalo E, "A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation", J Prosthet Dent, 102, pp.378~384 (2009)
- McLean JW, "The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique", Br Dent J, 131, pp.107~111 (1971)
- Belser UC, "Fit of three porcelain-fused-to-metal marginal designs in vivo: a scanning electron microscope study", J Prosthet Dent, 53, pp.24~29 (1985)
- Coli P, "Precision of a CAD", CAM technique for the production of zirconium dioxide copings, 2004, pp.17, 577~580
- Tinschert J, "Marginal fit of alumina-and zirconia-based fixed partial dentures produced by a CAD", CAM system, 2001, pp.26, 367~374
- Beuer F, "Precision of fit: zirconia three-unit fixed dental prostheses", Clin Oral Investig, 13, pp.343~349 (2009)
- Reich S, "Clinical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD", CAM systems, 2005, pp.113, 174~179
- Sailer I, "Five-year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures", Int J Prosthodont, 20, pp.383~388 (2007)
- Sailer I, "Prospective clinical study of zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures: 3-year follow-up", Quintessence Int, 37, pp.685~693 (2006)
- Sailer I, "Clinical study of the internal gaps of zirconia and metal frameworks for fixed partial dentures", Eur J Oral Sci, 116, pp.272~279 (2008)
- Kohorst P, "Marginal accuracy of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses fabricated using different computer-aided design", computer-aided manufacturing systems, 2009, pp.117, 319~325
- Abduo J, "Fit of zirconia fixed partial denture: a systematic review", J Oral Rehabil, 37, pp.866~876 (2010)
- Okutan M, "Fracture load and marginal fit of shrinkage-free ZrSiO4 all-ceramic crowns after chewing simulation", J Oral Rehabil, 33, pp.827~832 (2006)
- Gonzalo E, "Comparative analysis of two measurement methods for marginal fit in metal-ceramic and zirconia posterior FPDs", Int J Prosthodont, 22, pp.374~377 (2009)
- Vigolo P, "An in vitro evaluation of fit of zirconiumoxide-based ceramic four-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD", CAM systems, before and after porcelain firing cycles and after glaze cycles, 2008, pp.17, 621~626
- Kohorst P, "Influence of the veneering process on the marginal fit of zirconia fixed dental prostheses", J Oral Rehabil, 37, pp.283~291 (2010)
- Beuer F, "Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD", CAM generated restorations, 2008, pp.204, 505~511
- Witkowski S, "Marginal accuracy of titanium copings fabricated by casting and CAD", CAM techniques, 2006, pp.96, 47~52
- Bindl A, "Marginal and internal fit of all-ceramic CAD", CAM crown-copings on chamfer preparations, 2005, pp.32, 441~447
- Tuntiprawon M, "The effect of cement thickness on the fracture strength of all-ceramic crowns", Aust Dent J, 40, pp.17~21 (1995)
- Belles DM, "Effect of metal design and technique on the marginal characteristics of the collarless metal ceramic restoration", J Prosthet Dent, 65, pp.611~619 (1991)
- 윤종욱, "A study on the marginal fit of collarless metal ceramic fixed partial dentures", 대한치과보철학회지, 43(6), pp.707~716 (2005), 대한치과보철학회
- Bindl A, "Fit of all-ceramic posterior fixed partial denture frameworks in vitro", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 27, pp.567~575 (2007)
- Beuer F, "Influence of preparation angle on marginal and internal fit of CAD", CAM-fabricated zirconia crown copings, 2009, pp.40, 243~250
- Att W, "Marginal adaptation of three different zirconium dioxide three-unit fixed dental prostheses", J Prosthet Dent, 101, pp.239~247 (2009)
- Rosentritt M, "Marginal integrity of CAD", CAM fixed partial dentures, 2007, pp.1, 25~30
- May KB, "Precision of fit: the Procera AllCeram crown", J Prosthet Dent, 80, pp.394~404 (1998)
- Leong D, "Marginal fit of machine-milled titanium and cast titanium single crowns", Int J Prosthodont, 7, pp.440~447 (1994)
- Sulaiman F, "A comparison of the marginal fit of In-Ceram, IPS Empress, and Procera crowns", Int J Prosthodont, 10, pp.478~484 (1997)
- Stappert CF, "Marginal adaptation of three-unit fixed partial dentures constructed from pressed ceramic systems", Br Dent J, 196, pp.766~770 (2004)