Tensile strength of bilayered ceramics and corresponding glass veneers
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. To investigate the microtensile bond strength between two all-ceramic systems; lithium disilicate glass ceramic and zirconia core ceramics bonded with their corresponding glass veneers. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Blocks of core ceramics (IPS e.max® Press and LavaTM Frame) were fabricated and veneered with their corresponding glass veneers. The bilayered blocks were cut into microbars; 8 mm in length and 1 mm2 in cross-sectional area (n = 30/group). Additionally, monolithic microbars of these two veneers (IPS e.max® Ceram and LavaTM Ceram; n = 30/group) were also prepared. The obtained microbars were tested in tension until fracture, and the fracture surfaces of the microbars were examined with fluorescent black light and scanning electron microscope (SEM) to identify the mode of failure. One-way ANOVA and the Dunnett’s T3 test were performed to determine significant differences of the mean microtensile bond strength at a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS. The mean microtensile bond strength of IPS e.max® Press/IPS e.max® Ceram (43.40 ± 5.51 MPa) was significantly greater than that of LavaTM Frame/LavaTM Ceram (31.71 ± 7.03 MPa)(P<.001). Fluorescent black light and SEM analysis showed that most of the tested microbars failed cohesively in the veneer layer. Furthermore, the bond strength of LavaTM Frame/LavaTM Ceram was comparable to the tensile strength of monolithic glass veneer of LavaTM Ceram, while the bond strength of bilayered IPS e.max® Press/IPS e.max® Ceram was significantly greater than tensile strength of monolithic IPS e.max® Ceram. CONCLUSION. Because fracture site occurred mostly in the glass veneer and most failures were away from the interfacial zone, microtensile bond test may not be a suitable test for bonding integrity. Fracture mechanics approach such as fracture toughness of the interface may be more appropriate to represent the bonding quality between two materials.
Abstract
PURPOSE. To investigate the microtensile bond strength between two all-ceramic systems; lithium disilicate glass ceramic and zirconia core ceramics bonded with their corresponding glass veneers. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Blocks of core ceramics (IPS e.max® Press and LavaTM Frame) were fabricated and veneered with their corresponding glass veneers. The bilayered blocks were cut into microbars; 8 mm in length and 1 mm2 in cross-sectional area (n = 30/group). Additionally, monolithic microbars of these two veneers (IPS e.max® Ceram and LavaTM Ceram; n = 30/group) were also prepared. The obtained microbars were tested in tension until fracture, and the fracture surfaces of the microbars were examined with fluorescent black light and scanning electron microscope (SEM) to identify the mode of failure. One-way ANOVA and the Dunnett’s T3 test were performed to determine significant differences of the mean microtensile bond strength at a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS. The mean microtensile bond strength of IPS e.max® Press/IPS e.max® Ceram (43.40 ± 5.51 MPa) was significantly greater than that of LavaTM Frame/LavaTM Ceram (31.71 ± 7.03 MPa)(P<.001). Fluorescent black light and SEM analysis showed that most of the tested microbars failed cohesively in the veneer layer. Furthermore, the bond strength of LavaTM Frame/LavaTM Ceram was comparable to the tensile strength of monolithic glass veneer of LavaTM Ceram, while the bond strength of bilayered IPS e.max® Press/IPS e.max® Ceram was significantly greater than tensile strength of monolithic IPS e.max® Ceram. CONCLUSION. Because fracture site occurred mostly in the glass veneer and most failures were away from the interfacial zone, microtensile bond test may not be a suitable test for bonding integrity. Fracture mechanics approach such as fracture toughness of the interface may be more appropriate to represent the bonding quality between two materials.
참고문헌 (30)
- Raigrodski AJ., "Contemporary materials and technologies for all-ceramic fixed partial dentures : a review of the literature", J Prosthet Dent, 92, pp.557~562 (2004)
- Conrad HJ., "Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations : a systematic review", J Prosthet Dent, 98, pp.389~404 (2007)
- Odman P., "Procera AllCeram crowns followed for 5 to 10. 5 years : a prospective clinical study", Int J Prosthodont, 14, pp.504~509 (2001)
- Raigrodski AJ., "The efficacy of posterior three-unit zirconium-oxide-based ceramic fixed partial dental prostheses : a prospective clinical pilot study", J Prosthet Dent, 96, pp.237~244 (2006)
- Sailer I., "A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of allceramic and metal-ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part II : Fixed dental prostheses", Clin Oral Implants Res, 18, pp.86~96 (2007)
- Vult von Steyern P., "All-ceramic fixed partial dentures designed according to the DC-Zirkon technique. A 2-year clinical study", J Oral Rehabil, 32, pp.180~187 (2005)
- Guazzato M., "Strength, reliability, and mode of fracture of bilayered porcelain", core ceramics, 2004, pp.17, 142~149
- Dündar M., "Comparison of two bond strength testing methodologies for bilayered all-ceramics", Dent Mater, 23, pp.630~636 (2007)
- Della Bona A., "Shear vs. tensile bond strength of resin composite bonded to ceramic", J Dent Res, 74, pp.1591~1596 (1995)
- El Zohairy AA., "The influence of specimen attachment and dimension on microtensile strength", J Dent Res, 83, pp.420~424 (2004)
- Sano H., "Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength-evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test", Dent Mater, 10, pp.236~240 (1994)
- Aboushelib MN., "Effect of zirconia type on its bond strength with different veneer ceramics", J Prosthodont, 17, pp.401~408 (2008)
- El Zohairy AA., "Efficacy of microtensile versus microshear bond testing for evaluation of bond strength of dental adhesive systems to enamel", Dent Mater, 26, pp.848~854 (2010)
- Ferrari M., "Microtensile bond strength tests : scanning electron microscopy evaluation of sample integrity before testing", Eur J Oral Sci, 110, pp.385~391 (2002)
- Aboushelib MN., "Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations", Dent Mater, 21, pp.984~991 (2005)
- Aboushelib MN., "Microtensile bond strength and impact energy of fracture of CAD-veneered zirconia restorations", J Prosthodont, 18, pp.211~216 (2009)
- Aboushelib MN., "Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Part II : Zirconia veneering ceramics", Dent Mater, 22, pp.857~863 (2006)
- Taskonak B., "The effects of viscoelastic parameters on residual stress development in a zirconia", glass bilayer dental ceramic, 2008, pp.24, 1149~1155
- Taskonak B., "Residual stresses in bilayer dental ceramics", Biomaterials, 26, pp.3235~3241 (2005)
- Tan JP., "The use of slow heating and slow cooling regimens to strengthen porcelain fused to zirconia", J Prosthet Dent, 107, pp.163~169 (2012)
- Aboushelib MN., "Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Part 3 : double veneer technique", J Prosthodont, 17, pp.9~13 (2008)
- Benetti P., "Evaluation of thermal compatibility between core and veneer dental ceramics using shear bond strength test and contact angle measurement", Dent Mater, 26, pp.743~750 (2010)
- Benetti P., "The effect of porcelain thickness and surface liner application on the fracture behavior of a ceramic system", Dent Mater, 27, pp.948~953 (2011)
- Scherrer SS., "Direct comparison of the bond strength results of the different test methods: a critical literature review", Dent Mater, 26, pp.e78~e93 (2010)
- Tam LE., "Fracture toughness of dentin", resincomposite adhesive interfaces, 1993, pp.72, 953~959
- Ruse ND., "Novel fracture toughness test using a notchless triangular prism(NTP)specimen", J Biomed Mater Res, 31, pp.457~463 (1996)
- Tam LE., "Fracture resistance of dentin-composite interfaces using different adhesive resin layers", J Dent, 29, pp.217~225 (2001)
- Anunmana C., "Interfacial toughness of bilayer dental ceramics based on a short-bar, chevron-notch test", Dent Mater, 26, pp.111~117 (2010)
- Pashley DH., "Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents : a review", Dent Mater, 11, pp.117~125 (1995)
- Phrukkanon S., "The influence of crosssectional shape and surface area on the microtensile bond test", Dent Mater, 14, pp.212~221 (1998)