In vitro study of fracture strength of provisional crown materials
2
조회
0
다운로드
12
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. The purpose of this report was to evaluate the effect of the fabrication method and material type on the fracture strength of provisional crowns. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A master model with one crown (maxillary left second premolar) was manufactured from Cr-Co alloy. The master model was scanned, and the data set was transferred to a CAD/CAM unit (Yenamak D50, Yenadent Ltd, Istanbul, Turkey) for the Cercon Base group. For the other groups, temporary crowns were produced by direct fabrication methods (Imident, Temdent, Structur Premium, Takilon, Systemp c&b II, and Acrytemp). The specimens were subjected to water storage at 37C for 24 hours, and then they were thermocycled (TC, 5000×, 5-55캜) (n=10). The maximum force at fracture (Fmax) was measured in a universal test machine at 1 mm/min. Data was analyzed by non-parametric statistics (α=.05). RESULTS. Fmax values varied between 711.09-1392.1 N. In the PMMA groups, Takilon showed the lowest values (711.09 N), and Cercon Base showed the highest values (959.59 N). In the composite groups, Structur Premium showed the highest values (1392.1 N), and Acrytemp showed the lowest values (910.05 N). The composite groups showed significantly higher values than the PMMA groups (P=.01). CONCLUSION. Composite-based materials showed significantly higher fracture strengths than PMMA-based materials. The CADCAM technique offers more advantages than the direct technique.
Abstract
PURPOSE. The purpose of this report was to evaluate the effect of the fabrication method and material type on the fracture strength of provisional crowns. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A master model with one crown (maxillary left second premolar) was manufactured from Cr-Co alloy. The master model was scanned, and the data set was transferred to a CAD/CAM unit (Yenamak D50, Yenadent Ltd, Istanbul, Turkey) for the Cercon Base group. For the other groups, temporary crowns were produced by direct fabrication methods (Imident, Temdent, Structur Premium, Takilon, Systemp c&b II, and Acrytemp). The specimens were subjected to water storage at 37C for 24 hours, and then they were thermocycled (TC, 5000×, 5-55캜) (n=10). The maximum force at fracture (Fmax) was measured in a universal test machine at 1 mm/min. Data was analyzed by non-parametric statistics (α=.05). RESULTS. Fmax values varied between 711.09-1392.1 N. In the PMMA groups, Takilon showed the lowest values (711.09 N), and Cercon Base showed the highest values (959.59 N). In the composite groups, Structur Premium showed the highest values (1392.1 N), and Acrytemp showed the lowest values (910.05 N). The composite groups showed significantly higher values than the PMMA groups (P=.01). CONCLUSION. Composite-based materials showed significantly higher fracture strengths than PMMA-based materials. The CADCAM technique offers more advantages than the direct technique.
참고문헌 (31)
- Shillingburg HT, "Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics. 3. Auflage" (1997), Quintessence
- Burns DR, "A review of selected dental literature on contemporary provisional fixed prosthodontic treatment: report of the Committee on Research in Fixed Prosthodontics of the Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics", J Prosthet Dent, 90, pp.474~497 (2003)
- Gough M, "A review of temporary crowns and bridges", Dent Update, 21, pp.203~207 (1994)
- Anusavice KJ, "Phillips’ science of dental materials", pp.285~431 (1996), WB Saunders
- Gegauff AG, "Contemporary fixed prosthodontics", pp.380~416 (2001), Mosby
- Kim SH, "In vitro study of edge-strength of provisional polymer-based crown and fixed partial denture materials", Dent Mater, 23, pp.1570~1573 (2007)
- Burke FJ, "Trends in indirect dentistry: 6. Provisional restorations, more than just a temporary", Dent Update, 32, pp.443~444 (2005)
- Rosentritt M, "Flexural properties of prosthetic provisional polymers", Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent, 12, pp.75~79 (2004)
- Koumjian JH, "Evaluation of fracture resistance of resins used for provisional restorations", J Prosthet Dent, 64, pp.654~657 (1990)
- Young HM, "Comparative in vitro evaluation of two provisional restorative materials", J Prosthet Dent, 85, pp.129~132 (2001)
- Diaz-Arnold AM, "Microhardness of provisional fixed prosthodontic materials", J Prosthet Dent, 82, pp.525~528 (1999)
- Ireland MF, "In vitro mechanical property comparison of four resins used for fabrication of provisional fixed restorations", J Prosthet Dent, 80, pp.158~162 (1998)
- Osman YI, "Flexural strength of provisional restorative materials", J Prosthet Dent, 70, pp.94~96 (1993)
- Wang RL, "A comparison of resins for fabricating provisional fixed restorations", Int J Prosthodont, 2, pp.173~184 (1989)
- Balkenhol M, "Provisional crown and fixed partial denture materials: mechanical properties and degree of conversion", Dent Mater, 23, pp.1574~1583 (2007)
- McLean JW, "The failed restoration: causes of failure and how to prevent them", Int Dent J, 40, pp.354~358 (1990)
- Balkenhol M, "Correlation between polymerization shrinkage and marginal fit of temporary crowns", Dent Mater, 24, pp.1575~1584 (2008)
- Gougaloff R, "Immediate placement and provisionalization of a dental implant utilizing the CEREC 3CAD", CAM Protocol: a clinical case report, 2010, pp.38, 170~173
- Poticny DJ, "CAD", CAM in-office technology: innovations after 25 years for predictable, esthetic outcomes, 2010, pp.141, 5S~9S
- Ozcan M, "Effect of various surface conditioning methods on the adhesion of dual-cure resin cement with MDP functional monomer to zirconia after thermal aging", Dent Mater J, 27, pp.99~104 (2008)
- Pisani-Proenca J, "Influence of ceramic surface conditioning and resin cements on microtensile bond strength to a glass ceramic", J Prosthet Dent, 96, pp.412~417 (2006)
- Alt V, "Fracture strength of temporary fixed partial dentures: CAD", CAM versus directly fabricated restorations, 2011, pp.27, 339~347
- Balkenhol M, "Effect of surface condition and storage time on the repairability of temporary crown and fixed partial denture materials", J Dent, 36, pp.861~872 (2008)
- Balkenhol M, "Mechanical properties of provisional crown and bridge materials:chemical-curing versus dual-curing systems", J Dent, 36, pp.15~20 (2008)
- Kerby RE, "Mechanical properties of urethane and bis-acryl interim resin materials", J Prosthet Dent, 110, pp.21~28 (2013)
- Knobloch LA, "Relative fracture toughness of bis-acryl interim resin materials", J Prosthet Dent, 106, pp.118~125 (2011)
- Cheng CJ, "Multifactorial analysis of variables influencing the fracture strength of repair joints for provisional restorative materials using the statistically based Taguchi method", J Dent Sci, 5, pp.90~99 (2010)
- Nejatidanesh F, "Flexural strength of interim resin materials for fixed prosthodontics", J Prosthodont, 18, pp.507~511 (2009)
- Lang R, "Fracture resistance of PMMA and resin matrix composite-based interim FPD materials", Int J Prosthodont, 16, pp.381~384 (2003)
- Pihut M, "Measurement of occlusal forces in the therapy of functional disorders with the use of botulinum toxin type A", J Physiol Pharmacol, 60, pp.113~116 (2009)
- Tortopidis D, "The variability of bite force measurement between sessions, in different positions within the dental arch", J Oral Rehabil, 25, pp.681~686 (1998)