Accuracy of a direct drill-guiding system with minimal tolerance of surgical instruments used for implant surgery: a prospective clinical study
2
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. A recently introduced direct drill-guiding implant surgery system features minimal tolerance of surgical instruments in the metal sleeve by using shank-modified drills and a sleeve-incorporated stereolithographic guide template. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of this new guided surgery system in partially edentulous patients using geometric analyses. MATERIALS AND METHODS. For the study, 21 implants were placed in 11 consecutive patients using the direct drill-guiding implant surgery system. The stereolithographic surgical guide was fabricated using cone-beam computed tomography, digital scanning, computer-aided design and computer-assisted manufacturing, and additive manufacturing processes. After surgery, the positional and angular deviations between planned and placed implants were measured at the abutment level using implant-planning software. The Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare the deviations (α=.05). RESULTS. The mean horizontal deviations were 0.593 mm (SD 0.238) mesiodistally and 0.691 mm (SD 0.344) buccolingually. The mean vertical deviation was 0.925 mm (SD 0.376) occlusogingivally. The vertical deviation was significantly larger than the horizontal deviation (P=.018). The mean angular deviation was 2.024 degrees (SD 0.942) mesiodistally and 2.390 degrees (SD 1.142) buccolingually. CONCLUSION. The direct drill-guiding implant surgery system demonstrates high accuracy in placing implants. Use of the drill shank as the guiding component is an effective way for reducing tolerance.
Abstract
PURPOSE. A recently introduced direct drill-guiding implant surgery system features minimal tolerance of surgical instruments in the metal sleeve by using shank-modified drills and a sleeve-incorporated stereolithographic guide template. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of this new guided surgery system in partially edentulous patients using geometric analyses. MATERIALS AND METHODS. For the study, 21 implants were placed in 11 consecutive patients using the direct drill-guiding implant surgery system. The stereolithographic surgical guide was fabricated using cone-beam computed tomography, digital scanning, computer-aided design and computer-assisted manufacturing, and additive manufacturing processes. After surgery, the positional and angular deviations between planned and placed implants were measured at the abutment level using implant-planning software. The Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare the deviations (α=.05). RESULTS. The mean horizontal deviations were 0.593 mm (SD 0.238) mesiodistally and 0.691 mm (SD 0.344) buccolingually. The mean vertical deviation was 0.925 mm (SD 0.376) occlusogingivally. The vertical deviation was significantly larger than the horizontal deviation (P=.018). The mean angular deviation was 2.024 degrees (SD 0.942) mesiodistally and 2.390 degrees (SD 1.142) buccolingually. CONCLUSION. The direct drill-guiding implant surgery system demonstrates high accuracy in placing implants. Use of the drill shank as the guiding component is an effective way for reducing tolerance.
참고문헌 (31)
- Garber DA, "Restoration-driven implant placement with restoration-generated site development", Compend Contin Educ Dent, 16, pp.796~ (1995)
- Becker CM, "Surgical guide for dental implant placement", J Prosthet Dent, 83, pp.248~251 (2000)
- D’Souza KM, "Types of implant surgical guides in dentistry: a review", J Oral Implantol, 38, pp.643~652 (2012)
- Marchack CB, "CAD", CAM-guided implant surgery and fabrication of an immediately loaded prosthesis for a partially edentulous patient, 2007, pp.97, 389~394
- Park C, "Accuracy of implant placement using precision surgical guides with varying occlusogingival heights: an in vitro study", J Prosthet Dent, 101, pp.372~381 (2009)
- 이승록, "Anthropometric analysis of maxillary anterior buccal bone of Korean adults using cone-beam CT", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 2(3), pp.92~96 (2010), 대한치과보철학회
- Koop R, "Tolerance within the sleeve inserts of different surgical guides for guided implant surgery", Clin Oral Implants Res, 24, pp.630~634 (2013)
- Aalam AA, "Functional restoration of implants on the day of surgical placement in the fully edentulous mandible: a case series", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 7, pp.10~16 (2005)
- Barone A, "Immediate restoration of single implants placed immediately after tooth extraction", J Periodontol, 77, pp.1914~1920 (2006)
- Holst S, "Precision for computer-guided implant placement: using 3D planning software and fixed intraoral reference points", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 65, pp.393~399 (2007)
- 육신영, "A survey of the satisfaction of patients who have undergone implant surgery with and without employing a computer-guided implant surgical template", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 6(5), pp.395~405 (2014), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- Stumpel LJ 3rd, "Cast-based guided implant placement: a novel technique", J Prosthet Dent, 100, pp.61~69 (2008)
- Noharet R, "Accuracy of implant placement in the posterior maxilla as related to 2 types of surgical guides: a pilot study in the human cadaver", J Prosthet Dent, 112, pp.526~532 (2014)
- Cassetta M, "The Influence of the Tolerance between Mechanical Components on the Accuracy of Implants Inserted with a Stereolithographic Surgical Guide: A Retrospective Clinical Study", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 17, pp.580~588 (2015)
- Van Assche N, "Tolerance within a surgical guide", Clin Oral Implants Res, 21, pp.455~458 (2010)
- Widmann G, "Accuracy in computer-aided implant surgery-a review", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 21, pp.305~313 (2006)
- D’haese J, "A prospective study on the accuracy of mucosally supported stereolithographic surgical guides in fully edentulous maxillae", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 14, pp.293~303 (2012)
- Block MS, "Computed tomography-guided surgery:complications associated with scanning, processing, surgery, and prosthetics", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 67, pp.13~22 (2009)
- Vercruyssen M, "Guided surgery: accuracy and efficacy", Periodontol 2000, 66, pp.228~246 (2014)
- Cassetta M, "The intrinsic error of a stereolithographic surgical template in implant guided surgery", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 42, pp.264~275 (2013)
- Verhamme LM, "A clinically relevant accuracy study of computerplanned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 17, pp.343~352 (2015)
- Van de Wiele G, "The accuracy of guided surgery via mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical templates in the hands of surgeons with little experience", Clin Oral Implants Res, 26, pp.1489~1494 (2015)
- Van Assche N, "Accuracy of computer-aided implant placement", Clin Oral Implants Res, 23, pp.112~123 (2012)
- Verhamme LM, "A clinically relevant validation method for implant placement after virtual planning", Clin Oral Implants Res, 24, pp.1265~1272 (2013)
- 이재호, "An assessment of template-guided implant surgery in terms of accuracy and related factors", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 5(4), pp.440~447 (2013), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- Koyanagi K, "Development and clinical application of a surgical guide for optimal implant placement", J Prosthet Dent, 88, pp.548~552 (2002)
- De Kok IJ, "Radiographic stents: integrating treatment planning and implant placement", Dent Clin North Am, 58, pp.181~192 (2014)
- Greenstein G, "Using drill stops on twist drills to promote safety and efficiency when creating osteotomies for dental implants", J Am Dent Assoc, 145, pp.371~375 (2014)
- Schwarz L, "Autostop drilling device for implant site preparation: in vitro test of eccentric sensor position", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 30, pp.1041~1046 (2015)
- Juodzbalys G, "Inferior alveolar nerve injury associated with implant surgery", Clin Oral Implants Res, 24, pp.183~190 (2013)
- Nelogi S, "A surgical guide for optimal placement and immediate restoration of implant", J Oral Implantol, 40, pp.623~626 (2014)