Reliability of a chairside CAD-CAM surgical guide for dental implant surgery on the anterior maxilla: An in vitro study
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. This study evaluated the reliability of the chair-side CAD-CAM surgical guide (CSG) in the anterior maxilla by comparing its accuracy with the laboratory 3D-printed surgical guide (3DSG) and manual surgical guide (MSG) concerning different levels of dentists' surgical experience. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Ten surgical guides of each type (MSG, 3DSG, and CSG) were fabricated on a control study model with missing right and left central incisors. Sixty implants were placed in 30 study models by two dentists (one inexperienced and one experienced) using three different types of surgical guides. Horizontal deviations at shoulder and at apex, vertical, and angular deviations were measured after superimposing the planned and placed implant positions in the software. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare the accuracy of three types of surgical guides in each dentist group and the accuracy of each surgical guide between two dentists (α = .05). RESULTS. There were no significant differences in any deviations between CSG and 3DSG, apart from angular deviation, for both dentists’ groups. Moreover, both CSG and 3DSG showed no significant differences in accuracy between the two dentists (P > .05). In contrast, MSG demonstrated significant differences from CSG and 3DSG and a significant difference in accuracy between the two dentists (P < .05). CONCLUSION. CSG provides superior accuracy to MSG in implant placement in the maxillary anterior region and is comparable to 3DSG at different levels of surgical experience, while offering the benefits of shorter manufacturing time and reduced patient visits.
Abstract
PURPOSE. This study evaluated the reliability of the chair-side CAD-CAM surgical guide (CSG) in the anterior maxilla by comparing its accuracy with the laboratory 3D-printed surgical guide (3DSG) and manual surgical guide (MSG) concerning different levels of dentists' surgical experience. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Ten surgical guides of each type (MSG, 3DSG, and CSG) were fabricated on a control study model with missing right and left central incisors. Sixty implants were placed in 30 study models by two dentists (one inexperienced and one experienced) using three different types of surgical guides. Horizontal deviations at shoulder and at apex, vertical, and angular deviations were measured after superimposing the planned and placed implant positions in the software. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare the accuracy of three types of surgical guides in each dentist group and the accuracy of each surgical guide between two dentists (α = .05). RESULTS. There were no significant differences in any deviations between CSG and 3DSG, apart from angular deviation, for both dentists’ groups. Moreover, both CSG and 3DSG showed no significant differences in accuracy between the two dentists (P > .05). In contrast, MSG demonstrated significant differences from CSG and 3DSG and a significant difference in accuracy between the two dentists (P < .05). CONCLUSION. CSG provides superior accuracy to MSG in implant placement in the maxillary anterior region and is comparable to 3DSG at different levels of surgical experience, while offering the benefits of shorter manufacturing time and reduced patient visits.
참고문헌 (40)
- Jung RE, "A systematic review of the 5-year survival and complication rates of implant-supported single crowns", Clin Oral Implants Res, 19, pp.119~130 (2008)
- French D, "Long term clinical performance of 10 871 dental implants with up to 22 years of follow-up : A cohort study in 4247 patients", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 23, pp.289~297 (2021)
- Kiatkroekkrai P, "Accuracy of implant position when placed using static computer-assisted implant surgical guides manufactured with two different optical scanning techniques : a randomized clinical trial", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 49, pp.377~383 (2020)
- Buser D, "Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla : anatomic and surgical considerations", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 19(Suppl), pp.43~61 (2004)
- Grunder U, "Influence of the 3-D bone-to-implant relationship on esthetics", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 25, pp.113~119 (2005)
- Monje A, "Understanding peri-implantitis as a plaque-associated and site-specific entity : on the local predisposing factors", J Clin Med, 8, pp.279~ (2019)
- Leesungbok R., "Dr. Lee’s Top-Down implant dentistry", pp.8~24 (2004), Myoungmoon Publishing
- Garber DA, "Restoration-driven implant placement with restoration-generated site development", Compend Contin Educ Dent, 16, pp.796~ (1995)
- Brugnami F, "Prosthetically driven implant placement. How to achieve the appropriate implant site development", Keio J Med, 54, pp.172~178 (2005)
- Ramasamy M, "Implant surgical guides: From the past to the present", J Pharm Bioallied Sci, 5(Suppl 1), pp.S98~102 (2013)
- Blustein R, "Use of splint material in the placement of implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1, pp.47~49 (1986)
- Engelman MJ, "Optimum placement of osseointegrated implants", J Prosthet Dent, 59, pp.467~473 (1988)
- Balshi TJ, "Surgical guidestents for placement of implants", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 45, pp.463~465 (1987)
- Meitner SW, "Surgical templates for prosthetically guided implant placement", J Prosthet Dent, 92, pp.569~574 (2004)
- Vercruyssen M, "Depth and lateral deviations in guided implant surgery : an RCT comparing guided surgery with mental navigation or the use of a pilot-drill template", Clin Oral Implants Res, 26, pp.1315~1320 (2015)
- Jung RE, "Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry : a systematic review", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 24(Suppl), pp.92~109 (2009)
- Chackartchi T, "Reducing errors in guided implant surgery to optimize treatment outcomes", Periodontol 2000, 88, pp.64~72 (2022)
- Joda T, "The virtual patient in dental medicine", Clin Oral Implants Res, 26, pp.725~726 (2015)
- D'Souza KM, "Types of implant surgical guides in dentistry : a review", J Oral Implantol, 38, pp.643~652 (2012)
- Fortin T, "Precision of transfer of preoperative planning for oral implants based on cone-beam CT-scan images through a robotic drilling machine", Clin Oral Implants Res, 13, pp.651~656 (2002)
- Park JM, "Comparison of five-axis milling and rapid prototyping for implant surgical templates", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 29, pp.374~383 (2014)
- Hinckfuss S, "Effect of surgical guide design and surgeon's experience on the accuracy of implant placement", J Oral Implantol, 38, pp.311~323 (2012)
- Park SJ, "Reliability of a CAD", CAM surgical guide for implant placement : an in vitro comparison of surgeons' experience levels and implant sites, 2017, pp.30, 367~369
- Graf T, "Time and costs related to computer-assisted versus non-computer-assisted implant planning and surgery. A systematic review", Clin Oral Implants Res, 32(Suppl 21), pp.303~317 (2021)
- 현상우, "Computer-guided implant surgery and immediate provisionalization by chair-side CAD-CAM: A case report", 대한치과보철학회지, 59(4), pp.478~486 (2021), 대한치과보철학회
- Song YW, "Accuracy of dental implant placement by a novel inhouse model-free and zero-setup fully guided surgical template made of a light-cured composite resin(VARO Guide®) : a comparative in vitro study", Materials(Basel), 14, pp.4023~ (2021)
- Misch CE, "Density of bone: effect on treatment plans, surgical approach, healing, and progressive boen loading", Int J Oral Implantol, 6, pp.23~31 (1990)
- Noharet R, "Accuracy of implant placement in the posterior maxilla as related to 2 types of surgical guides : a pilot study in the human cadaver", J Prosthet Dent, 112, pp.526~532 (2014)
- Vermeulen J, "The accuracy of implant placement by experienced surgeons : guided vs freehand approach in a simulated plastic model", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 32, pp.617~624 (2017)
- Chen Z, "Accuracy of flapless immediate implant placement in anterior maxilla using computer-assisted versus freehand surgery : A cadaver study", Clin Oral Implants Res, 29, pp.1186~1194 (2018)
- Tahmaseb A, "The accuracy of static computer-aided implant surgery : A systematic review and meta-analysis", Clin Oral Implants Res, 29(Suppl 16), pp.416~435 (2018)
- Abduo J, "Accuracy of static computer-assisted implant placement in anterior and posterior sites by clinicians new to implant dentistry: in vitro comparison of fully guided, pilot-guided, and freehand protocols", Int J Implant Dent, 6, pp.10~ (2020)
- Schneider D, "Accuracy of computer-assisted, template-guided implant placement compared with conventional implant placement by hand-An in vitro study", Clin Oral Implants Res, 32, pp.1052~1060 (2021)
- Rungcharassaeng K, "Accuracy of computer-guided surgery : a comparison of operator experience", J Prosthet Dent, 114, pp.407~413 (2015)
- Cushen SE, "Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates : an in vitro study", J Prosthet Dent, 109, pp.248~254 (2013)
- Wang X, "Influence of experience on dental implant placement:an in vitro comparison of freehand, static guided and dynamic navigation approaches", Int J Implant Dent, 8, pp.42~ (2022)
- Fürhauser R, "Esthetics of flapless single-tooth implants in the anterior maxilla using guided surgery : association of three-dimensional accuracy and pink esthetic score", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 17(Suppl 2), pp.e427~33 (2015)
- Singthong W, "A randomized clinical trial on the accuracy of guided implant surgery between two implant-planning programs used by inexperienced operators", J Prosthet Dent, S0022-3913(22), pp.00104~00104 (2022)
- Verhamme LM, "A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 17, pp.343~352 (2015)
- El Kholy K, "Influence of surgical guide support and implant site location on accuracy of static computer-assisted implant surgery", Clin Oral Implants Res, 30, pp.1067~1075 (2019)