Comparison of the fit accuracy of zirconia-based prostheses generated by two CAD/CAM systems
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. The purposes of this study are to evaluate the internal and marginal adaptation of two widely used CAD/CAM systems and to study the effect of porcelain press veneering process on the prosthesis adaptation. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Molar of a lower jaw typodont resin model was prepared by adjusting a 1.0 mm circumferential chamfer, an occlusal reduction of 2.0 mm, and a 5° convergence angle and was duplicated as an abrasion-resistant master die. The monolithic crowns and copings were fabricated with two different CAD/CAM system-Ceramil and Zirkonzahn systems. Two kinds of non-destructive analysis methods are used in this study. First, weight technique was used to determine the overall fitting accuracy. And, to evaluate internal and marginal fit of specific part, replica technique procedures were performed. RESULTS. The silicone weight for the cement space of monolithic crowns and copings manufactured with Ceramil system was significantly higher than that from Zirkonzahn system. This gap might cause the differences in the silicone weight because the prostheses were manufactured according to the recommendation of each system. Marginal discrepancies of copings made with Ceramil system were between 106 and 117 μm and those from Zirkonzahn system were between 111 and 115 μm. Marginal discrepancies of copings made with Ceramil system were between 101 and 131 μm and those from Zirkonzahn system were between 116 and 131 μm. CONCLUSION. Marginal discrepancy was relatively lower in Ceramil system and internal gap was smaller in Zirkonzahn system. There were significant differences in the internal gap of monolithic crown and coping among the 2 CAD/CAM systems. Marginal discrepancy produced from the 2 CAD/CAM systems were within a reported clinically acceptable range of marginal discrepancy.
Abstract
PURPOSE. The purposes of this study are to evaluate the internal and marginal adaptation of two widely used CAD/CAM systems and to study the effect of porcelain press veneering process on the prosthesis adaptation. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Molar of a lower jaw typodont resin model was prepared by adjusting a 1.0 mm circumferential chamfer, an occlusal reduction of 2.0 mm, and a 5° convergence angle and was duplicated as an abrasion-resistant master die. The monolithic crowns and copings were fabricated with two different CAD/CAM system-Ceramil and Zirkonzahn systems. Two kinds of non-destructive analysis methods are used in this study. First, weight technique was used to determine the overall fitting accuracy. And, to evaluate internal and marginal fit of specific part, replica technique procedures were performed. RESULTS. The silicone weight for the cement space of monolithic crowns and copings manufactured with Ceramil system was significantly higher than that from Zirkonzahn system. This gap might cause the differences in the silicone weight because the prostheses were manufactured according to the recommendation of each system. Marginal discrepancies of copings made with Ceramil system were between 106 and 117 μm and those from Zirkonzahn system were between 111 and 115 μm. Marginal discrepancies of copings made with Ceramil system were between 101 and 131 μm and those from Zirkonzahn system were between 116 and 131 μm. CONCLUSION. Marginal discrepancy was relatively lower in Ceramil system and internal gap was smaller in Zirkonzahn system. There were significant differences in the internal gap of monolithic crown and coping among the 2 CAD/CAM systems. Marginal discrepancy produced from the 2 CAD/CAM systems were within a reported clinically acceptable range of marginal discrepancy.
참고문헌 (44)
- Hannink RHJ, "Transformation toughening in zirconia-containing ceramics", J Am Ceram Soc, 83, pp.461~487 (2000)
- Conrad HJ, "Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review", J Prosthet Dent, 98, pp.389~404 (2007)
- Baig MR, "Evaluation of the marginal fit of a zirconia ceramic computer-aided machined (CAM)crown system", J Prosthet Dent, 104, pp.216~227 (2010)
- Beuer F, "Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD", CAM generated restorations, 2008, pp.204, 505~511
- Luthardt RG, "Reliability and properties of ground Y-TZP-zirconia ceramics", J Dent Res, 81, pp.487~491 (2002)
- Martínez-Rus F, "Evaluation of the absolute marginal discrepancy of zirconia-based ceramic copings", J Prosthet Dent, 105, pp.108~114 (2011)
- Kohorst P, "Different CAD", CAM-processing routes for zirconia restorations:influence on fitting accuracy, 2011, pp.15, 527~536
- Tan K, "A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5years", Clin Oral Implants Res, 15, pp.654~666 (2004)
- Felton DA, "Effect of in vivo crown margin discrepancies on periodontal health", J Prosthet Dent, 65, pp.357~364 (1991)
- Tinschert J, "Status of current CAD", CAM technology in dental medicine, 2004, pp.7, 25~45
- Molin MK, "Influence of film thickness on joint bend strength of a ceramic", resin composite joint, 1996, pp.12, 245~249
- McLean JW, "The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique", Br Dent J, 131, pp.107~111 (1971)
- Boitelle P, "A systematic review of CAD", CAM fit restoration evaluations, 2014, pp.41, 853~874
- Holmes JR, "Considerations in measurement of marginal fit", J Prosthet Dent, 62, pp.405~408 (1989)
- Holmes JR, "Marginal fit of castable ceramic crowns", J Prosthet Dent, 67, pp.594~599 (1992)
- Sorensen JA, "A standardized method for determination of crown margin fidelity", J Prosthet Dent, 64, pp.18~24 (1990)
- Moldovan O, "Threedimensional fit of CAD", CAM-made zirconia copings, 2011, pp.27, 1273~1278
- Falk A, "Reliability of the impression replica technique", Int J Prosthodont, 28, pp.179~180 (2015)
- Trifković B, "Application of replicatechnique and SEM in accuracy measurement of ceramic crowns", Meas Sci Rev, 12, pp.90~97 (2012)
- Grenade C, "Fit of single tooth zirconia copings: comparison between various manufacturing processes", J Prosthet Dent, 105, pp.249~255 (2011)
- Subasi G, "Evaluation of marginal fit of two all-ceramic copings with two finish lines", Eur J Dent, 6, pp.163~168 (2012)
- Tinschert J, "Marginal fit of alumina-and zirconia-based fixed partial dentures produced by a CAD", CAM system, 2001, pp.26, 367~374
- Felton DA, "Effect of in vivo crown margin discrepancies on periodontal health", J Prosthet Dent, 65, pp.357~364 (1991)
- Reich S, "Clinical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD", CAM systems, 2005, pp.113, 174~179
- Souza RO, "Marginal and internal discrepancies related to margin design of ceramic crowns fabricated by a CAD", CAM system, 2012, pp.21, 94~100
- Borba M, "Adaptation of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures", Dent Mater, 27, pp.1119~1126 (2011)
- Ucar Y, "Internal fit evaluation of crowns prepared using a new dental crown fabrication technique: laser-sintered Co-Cr crowns", J Prosthet Dent, 102, pp.253~259 (2009)
- Pelekanos S, "Micro-CT evaluation of the marginal fit of different In-Ceram alumina copings", Eur J Esthet Dent, 4, pp.278~292 (2009)
- Kokubo Y, "Clinical marginal and internal gaps of In-Ceram crowns fabricated using the GN-I system", J Oral Rehabil, 32, pp.753~758 (2005)
- McLean JW, "The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique", Br Dent J, 131, pp.107~111 (1971)
- Nakamura T, "Marginal and internal fit of Cerec 3 CAD", CAM all-ceramic crowns, 2003, pp.16, 244~248
- May KB, "Precision of fit: the Procera AllCeram crown", J Prosthet Dent, 80, pp.394~404 (1998)
- Coli P, "Fit of a new pressure-sintered zirconium dioxide coping", Int J Prosthodont, 17, pp.59~64 (2004)
- Laurent M, "Clinical evaluation of the marginal fit of cast crowns-validation of the silicone replica method", J Oral Rehabil, 35, pp.116~122 (2008)
- Fransson B, "The fit of metal-ceramic crowns, a clinical study", Dent Mater, 1, pp.197~199 (1985)
- Boening KW, "Non-cast titanium restorations in fixed prosthodontics", J Oral Rehabil, 19, pp.281~287 (1992)
- Balkaya MC, "Influence of firing cycles on the margin distortion of 3 all-ceramic crown systems", J Prosthet Dent, 93, pp.346~355 (2005)
- Gemalmaz D, "Marginal fit changes during porcelain firing cycles", J Prosthet Dent, 73, pp.49~54 (1995)
- Castellani D, "Thermal distortion of different materials in crown construction", J Prosthet Dent, 72, pp.360~366 (1994)
- Hung SH, "Marginal fit of porcelain-fused-to-metal and two types of ceramic crown", J Prosthet Dent, 63, pp.26~31 (1990)
- Shearer B, "Influence of marginal configuration and porcelain addition on the fit of In-Ceram crowns", Biomaterials, 17, pp.1891~1895 (1996)
- 송태진, "Marginal fit of the Auro Galvano Crown system made using the electroforming technique", 석사, 치과보철학, pp.2004
- Kianoosh Torabi, "The effect of various veneering techniques on the marginal fit of zirconia copings", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 7(3), pp.233~239 (2015), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- Weaver JD, "Marginal adaptation of castable ceramic crowns", J Prosthet Dent, 66, pp.747~753 (1991)