Comparison of the marginal fit of milled yttrium stabilized zirconium dioxide crowns obtained by scanning silicone impressions and by scanning stone replicas
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. To determine the discrepancy in monolithic zirconium dioxide crowns made with computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) systems by comparing scans of silicone impressions and of master casts. MATERIALS AND METHODS. From a Cr-Co master die of a first upper left molar, 30 silicone impressions were taken. The 30 silicone impressions were scanned with the laboratory scanner, thus obtaining 30 milled monolithic yttrium stabilized zirconium dioxide (YSZD) crowns (the silicone group). They were poured and the working models were scanned, obtaining 30 milled monolithic yttrium stabilized zirconium dioxide (YSZD) crowns (the plaster group). Three predetermined points were analyzed in each side of the crown (Mesial, Distal ,Vestibular and Palatal), and the marginal fit was evaluated with SEM (×600). The response variable is the discrepancy from the master model. A repeated measures ANOVA with two within subject factors was performed to study significance of main factors and interaction. RESULTS. Mean marginal discrepancy was 22.42±35.65 μm in the silicone group and 8.94±14.69 μm in the plaster group. The statistical analysis showed significant differences between the two groups and also among the four aspects. Interaction was also significant (P=.02). CONCLUSION. The mean marginal fit values of the two groups were within the clinically acceptable values. Significant differences were found between the groups according to the aspects studied. Various factors influenced the accuracy of digitizing, such as the design, the geometry, and the preparation guidance, as well as the texture, roughness and the color of the scanned material.
Abstract
PURPOSE. To determine the discrepancy in monolithic zirconium dioxide crowns made with computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) systems by comparing scans of silicone impressions and of master casts. MATERIALS AND METHODS. From a Cr-Co master die of a first upper left molar, 30 silicone impressions were taken. The 30 silicone impressions were scanned with the laboratory scanner, thus obtaining 30 milled monolithic yttrium stabilized zirconium dioxide (YSZD) crowns (the silicone group). They were poured and the working models were scanned, obtaining 30 milled monolithic yttrium stabilized zirconium dioxide (YSZD) crowns (the plaster group). Three predetermined points were analyzed in each side of the crown (Mesial, Distal ,Vestibular and Palatal), and the marginal fit was evaluated with SEM (×600). The response variable is the discrepancy from the master model. A repeated measures ANOVA with two within subject factors was performed to study significance of main factors and interaction. RESULTS. Mean marginal discrepancy was 22.42±35.65 μm in the silicone group and 8.94±14.69 μm in the plaster group. The statistical analysis showed significant differences between the two groups and also among the four aspects. Interaction was also significant (P=.02). CONCLUSION. The mean marginal fit values of the two groups were within the clinically acceptable values. Significant differences were found between the groups according to the aspects studied. Various factors influenced the accuracy of digitizing, such as the design, the geometry, and the preparation guidance, as well as the texture, roughness and the color of the scanned material.
참고문헌 (30)
- Caparroso CB, "Marginal adaptation and internal fit of zirconia-ytrya frameworks fabricated with <TEX>$Procera^{(R)}$<", TEX> and Cerec <TEX>$in-Lab^{(R)}$<, CAM systems, pp.Rev Fac Odontol Univ Antioq, 2011[DOI]
- An S, "Evaluating the marginal fit of zirconia copings with digital impressions with an intraoral digital scanner", J Prosthet Dent, 112, pp.1171~1175 (2014)[DOI]
- Alghazzawi TF, "Effect of imaging powder and CAD", CAM stone types on the marginal gap of zirconia crowns, 2015, pp.146, 111~120
- Pradies G, "Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions based on wavefront sampling technology", J Dent, 43, pp.201~208 (2015)[DOI]
- Reich S, "Clinical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures,generated with three different CAD", CAM systems, 2005, pp.113, 174~179
- Ting-Shu S, "Intraoral digital impression technique: A review", J Prosthodont, 24, pp.313~321 (2015)[DOI]
- Keul C, "Fit of 4-unit FDPs made of zirconia and CoCr-alloy after chairside and labside digitalization-a laboratory study", Dent Mater, 30, pp.400~407 (2014)[DOI]
- Syrek A, "Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling", J Dent, 38, pp.553~559 (2010)[DOI]
- Ng J, "A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods", J Prosthet Dent, 112, pp.555~560 (2014)[DOI]
- Flugge TV, "Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 144, pp.471~478 (2013)[DOI]
- 이완선, "Evaluation of different approaches for using a laser scanner in digitization of dental impressions", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 6(1), pp.22~29 (2014), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- Schillingburg HT, "Fundamentals of Fixed Prosthodontics", pp.130~132 (2006), Ed Quintessence Books
- Renne W, "Predicting marginal fit of CAD", CAM crowns based on the presence or absence of common preparation errors, 2012, pp.108, 310~315
- Tsitrou EA, "Evaluation of the marginal fit of three margin designs of resin composite crowns using CAD", CAM, 2007, pp.35, 68~73
- Rinke S, "Range of indications for translucent zirconia modif icat ions: c l in ica l and technica l aspects", Quintessence Int, 44, pp.557~566 (2013)
- Lawrence MA, "ez: Easy analysis and visualization of factorial experiments. Computer software manual. (R package version 3.0-0)" (2011)
- Holmes JR, "Considerations in measurement of marginal fit", J Prosthet Dent, 62, pp.405~408 (1989)[DOI]
- Persson AS, "Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness", Dent Mater, 25, pp.929~936 (2009)[DOI]
- Patzelt SB, "Accuracy of computer- aided design", computer-aided manufacturing-generated dental casts based on intraoral scanner data, 2014, pp.145, 1133~1140
- Anami LC, "Finite element analysis of the influence of geometry and design of zirconia crowns on stress distribution", J Prosthodont, 24, pp.146~151 (2015)[DOI]
- DeLong R, "Accuracy of contacts calculated from 3D images of occlusal surfaces", J Dent, 35, pp.528~534 (2007)[DOI]
- Rudolph H, "Computer-aided analysis of the influence of digitizing and surfacing on the accuracy in dental CAD", CAM technology, 2007, pp.37, 579~587
- Persson AS, "Computer aided analysis of digitized dental stone replicas by dental CAD", CAM technology, 2008, pp.24, 1123~1130
- Schaefer O, "Impact of digital impression techniques on the adaption of ceramic partial crowns in vitro", J Dent, 42, pp.677~683 (2014)[DOI]
- Quaas S, "Direct mechanical data acquisition of dental impressions for the manufacturing of CAD", CAM restorations, 2007, pp.35, 903~908
- Schaefer O, "Three-dimensional fit of lithium disilicate partial crowns in vitro", J Dent, 41, pp.271~277 (2013)[DOI]
- Syrek A, "Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling", J Dent, 38, pp.553~559 (2010)[DOI]
- DeLong R, "Factors influencing optical 3D scanning of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials", J Prosthodont, 10, pp.78~85 (2001)[DOI]
- Seo D, "The effect of preparation designs on the marginal and internal gaps in Cerec3 partial ceramic crowns", J Dent, 37, pp.374~382 (2009)[DOI]
- Kim KB, "Three-dimensional evaluation of gaps associated with fixed dental prostheses fabricated with new technologies", J Prosthet Dent, 112, pp.1432~1436 (2014)[DOI]