Evaluation of the effect of abutment preparation angles on the repeatability and reproducibility using a blue light model scanner
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of the abutment angle using a blue light scanner. MATERIALS AND METHODS. 0°, 6°, and 10° wax cast abutment dies were fabricated. Each of the silicone impression was produced using the replicable silicone. Each study die was constructed from the prepared replicable stone used for scans. 3-dimensional data was obtained after scanning the prepared study dies for the repeatability by using the blue light scanner. The prepared 3-dimensional data could have the best fit alignment using 3-dimensional software. For reproducibility, each abutment was used as the first reference study die, and then it was scanned five times per each. 3-dimensional software was used to perform the best fit alignment. The data obtained were analyzed using a nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis H test (α=.05), post hoc Mann-Whitney U test, and Bonferroni correction (α=.017). RESULTS. The repeatability of 0°, 6°, and 10° abutments was 3.9, 4.4 and 4.7 μm, respectively. Among them, the 0° abutment had the best value while the 10° abutment showed the worst value. There was a statistically significant difference (P<.05). The reproducibility of 0°, 6°, and 10° abutments was 6.1, 5.5, and 5.3 μm, respectively. While the 10° abutment showed the best value, the 0° abutment showed the worst value. However, there was no statistically significant difference (P>.05). CONCLUSION. In repeatability, the 0° abutment showed a positive result. In reproducibility, the 10° abutment achieved a positive result.
Abstract
PURPOSE. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of the abutment angle using a blue light scanner. MATERIALS AND METHODS. 0°, 6°, and 10° wax cast abutment dies were fabricated. Each of the silicone impression was produced using the replicable silicone. Each study die was constructed from the prepared replicable stone used for scans. 3-dimensional data was obtained after scanning the prepared study dies for the repeatability by using the blue light scanner. The prepared 3-dimensional data could have the best fit alignment using 3-dimensional software. For reproducibility, each abutment was used as the first reference study die, and then it was scanned five times per each. 3-dimensional software was used to perform the best fit alignment. The data obtained were analyzed using a nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis H test (α=.05), post hoc Mann-Whitney U test, and Bonferroni correction (α=.017). RESULTS. The repeatability of 0°, 6°, and 10° abutments was 3.9, 4.4 and 4.7 μm, respectively. Among them, the 0° abutment had the best value while the 10° abutment showed the worst value. There was a statistically significant difference (P<.05). The reproducibility of 0°, 6°, and 10° abutments was 6.1, 5.5, and 5.3 μm, respectively. While the 10° abutment showed the best value, the 0° abutment showed the worst value. However, there was no statistically significant difference (P>.05). CONCLUSION. In repeatability, the 0° abutment showed a positive result. In reproducibility, the 10° abutment achieved a positive result.
참고문헌 (26)
- Davidowitz G, "The use of CAD", CAM in dentistry, 2011, pp.55, 559~570
- Duret F, "CAD", CAM imaging in dentistry, 1991, pp.1, 150~154
- Hamza TA, "In vitro evaluation of marginal discrepancy of monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated with different CAD-CAM systems", J Prosthet Dent, 117, pp.762~766 (2017)
- Liebermann A, "Physicomechanical characterization of polyetheretherketone and current esthetic dental CAD", CAM polymers after aging in different storage media, 2016, pp.115, 321~328
- Ruse ND, "Resin-composite blocks for dental CAD", CAM applications, 2014, pp.93, 1232~1234
- Atia MA, "Validity of 3 shape scanner techniques : a comparison with the actual plaster study casts", Biom Biostat Int J, 2, pp.64~69 (2015)
- Jeon JH, "Three-dimensional evaluation of the repeatability of scanned conventional impressions of prepared teeth generated with white- and blue-light scanners", J Prosthet Dent, 114, pp.549~553 (2015)
- Keeling A, "Confounding factors affecting the marginal quality of an intra-oral scan", J Dent, 59, pp.33~40 (2017)
- Lee JJ, "Accuracy of single-abutment digital cast obtained using intraoral and cast scanners", J Prosthet Dent, 117, pp.253~259 (2017)
- Lee WS, "New approach to accuracy verification of 3D surface models : An analysis of point cloud coordinates", J Prosthodont Res, 60, pp.98~105 (2016)
- Mandelli F, "Evaluation of the accuracy of extraoral laboratory scanners with a singletooth abutment model : A 3D analysis", J Prosthodont Res, 61, pp.363~370 (2017)
- Ender A, "In-vitro evaluation of the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining full-arch dental impressions", Quintessence Int, 46, pp.9~17 (2015)
- Jeon JH, "Three-dimensional evaluation of the repeatability of scans of stone models and impressions using a blue LED scanner", Dent Mater J, 34, pp.686~691 (2015)
- 전진훈, "Repeatability and reproducibility of individual abutment impression, assessed with a blue light scanner", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 8(3), pp.214~218 (2016), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- 전진훈, "White light scanner-based repeatability of 3-dimensional digitizing of silicon rubber abutment teeth impressions", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 5(4), pp.452~456 (2013), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- Jeong ID, "Accuracy of complete-arch model using an intraoral video scanner : an in vitro study", J Prosthet Dent, 115, pp.755~759 (2016)
- Bae SY, "Three-dimensional analysis of marginal and internal fit of copings fabricated with polyetherketoneketone(PEKK)and zirconia", J Prosthodont Res, 61, pp.106~112 (2017)
- Kim CM, "Threedimensional evaluation of the reproducibility of presintered zirconia single copings fabricated with the subtractive method", J Prosthet Dent, 116, pp.237~241 (2016)
- Kim DY, "Reproducibility of different coping arrangements fabricated by dental microstereolithography : evaluation of marginal and internal gaps in metal copings", J Dent Sci, 13, pp.220~225 (2018)
- Kim DY, "Comparison and evaluation of marginal and internal gaps in cobalt-chromium alloy copings fabricated using subtractive and additive manufacturing", J Prosthodont Res, 62, pp.56~64 (2018)
- 박진영, "Evaluation of the marginal and internal gaps of three different dental prostheses: comparison of the silicone replica technique and three-dimensional superimposition analysis", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 9(3), pp.159~169 (2017), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- Kusnoto B, "Reliability of a 3D surface laser scanner for orthodontic applications", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 122, pp.342~348 (2002)
- Ulusoy AO, "Robust one-shot 3D scanning using loopy belief propagation", Computer vision and pattern recognition workshops (CVPRW), 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on, pp.15~22 (2010), IEEE
- Hye-Nan Park, "A comparison of the accuracy of intraoral scanners using an intraoral environment simulator", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 10(1), pp.58~64 (2018), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- Jeon JH, "In vitro precision evaluation of blue light scanning of abutment teeth made with impressions and dental stone casts according to different 3D superimposition methods", J Prosthodont Res, 64, pp.368~372 (2020)
- Persson A, "A three-dimensional evaluation of a laser scanner and a touchprobe scanner", J Prosthet Dent, 95, pp.194~200 (2006)