Repeatability and reproducibility of individual abutment impression, assessed with a blue light scanner
2
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. We assessed the repeatability and reproducibility of abutment teeth dental impressions, digitized with a blue light scanner, by comparing the discrepancies in repeatability and reproducibility values for different types of abutment teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS. To evaluate repeatability, impressions of the canine, first premolar, and first molar, prepared for ceramic crowns, were repeatedly scanned to acquire 5 sets of 3-dimensional data via stereolithography (STL) files. Point clouds were compared and the error sizes were measured (n=10, per type). To evaluate reproducibility, the impressions were rotated by 10-20° on the table and scanned. These data were compared to the first STL data and the error sizes were measured (n=5, per type). Oneway analysis of variance was used to assess the repeatability and reproducibility of the 3 types of teeth, and Tukey honest significant differences (HSD) multiple comparison test was used for post hoc comparisons (α=.05). RESULTS. The differences with regard to repeatability were 4.5, 2.7, and 3.1 μm for the canine, premolar, and molar, indicating the poorest repeatability for the canine (P<.001). For reproducibility, the differences were 6.6, 5.8, and 11.0 μm indicating the poorest reproducibility for the molar (P=.007). CONCLUSION. Our results indicated that impressions of individual abutment teeth, digitized with a blue light scanner, had good repeatability and reproducibility.
Abstract
PURPOSE. We assessed the repeatability and reproducibility of abutment teeth dental impressions, digitized with a blue light scanner, by comparing the discrepancies in repeatability and reproducibility values for different types of abutment teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS. To evaluate repeatability, impressions of the canine, first premolar, and first molar, prepared for ceramic crowns, were repeatedly scanned to acquire 5 sets of 3-dimensional data via stereolithography (STL) files. Point clouds were compared and the error sizes were measured (n=10, per type). To evaluate reproducibility, the impressions were rotated by 10-20° on the table and scanned. These data were compared to the first STL data and the error sizes were measured (n=5, per type). Oneway analysis of variance was used to assess the repeatability and reproducibility of the 3 types of teeth, and Tukey honest significant differences (HSD) multiple comparison test was used for post hoc comparisons (α=.05). RESULTS. The differences with regard to repeatability were 4.5, 2.7, and 3.1 μm for the canine, premolar, and molar, indicating the poorest repeatability for the canine (P<.001). For reproducibility, the differences were 6.6, 5.8, and 11.0 μm indicating the poorest reproducibility for the molar (P=.007). CONCLUSION. Our results indicated that impressions of individual abutment teeth, digitized with a blue light scanner, had good repeatability and reproducibility.
참고문헌 (21)
- Nedelcu RG, "Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis", J Prosthet Dent, 112, pp.1461~1471 (2014)
- Persson A, "A three-dimensional evaluation of a laser scanner and a touchprobe scanner", J Prosthet Dent, 95, pp.194~200 (2006)
- 전진훈, "Accuracy of 3D white light scanning of abutment teeth impressions: evaluation of trueness and precision", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 6(6), pp.468~473 (2014), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- Quaas S, "Direct mechanical data acquisition of dental impressions for the manufacturing of CAD", CAM restorations, 2007, pp.35, 903~908
- 전진훈, "White light scanner-based repeatability of 3-dimensional digitizing of silicon rubber abutment teeth impressions", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 5(4), pp.452~456 (2013), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- Jeon JH, "Three-dimensional evaluation of the repeatability of scanned conventional impressions of prepared teeth generated with white- and blue-light scanners", J Prosthet Dent, 114, pp.549~553 (2015)
- Jeon JH, "Threedimensional evaluation of the repeatability of scans of stone models and impressions using a blue LED scanner", Dent Mater J, 34, pp.686~691 (2015)
- Luthardt RG, "Accuracy of intraoral data acquisition in comparison to the conventional impression", Int J Comput Dent, 8, pp.283~294 (2005)
- Ender A, "Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions:a new method of measuring trueness and precision", J Prosthet Dent, 109, pp.121~128 (2013)
- Persson AS, "Computer aided analysis of digitized dental stone replicas by dental CAD", CAM technology, 2008, pp.24, 1123~1130
- Bernal C, "Performance evaluation of optical scanner based on blue LED structured light", Procedia Eng, 63, pp.591~598 (2013)
- "Dentistry - Digitizing devices for CAD/CAM systems for indirect dental restorations-test methods for assessing accuracy"[URL]
- Hoyos A, "Influence of tray rigidity and impression technique on accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane impressions", Int J Prosthodont, 24, pp.49~54 (2011)
- Wöstmann B, "Accuracy of impressions obtained with dual-arch trays", Int J Prosthodont, 22, pp.158~160 (2009)
- Ziegler M, "Digital impression taking with reproducibly high precision", Int J Comput Dent, 12, pp.159~163 (2009)
- Chandran DT, "Twoand three-dimensional accuracy of dental impression materials:effects of storage time and moisture contamination", Biomed Mater Eng, 20, pp.243~249 (2010)
- Logozzo S, "Recent advances in dental optics – Part I: 3D intraoral scanners for restorative dentistry", Opt Lasers Eng, 54, pp.203~221 (2014)
- Martorelli M, "A new method to assess the accuracy of a Cone Beam Computed Tomography scanner by using a non-contact reverse engineering technique", J Dent, 42, pp.460~465 (2014)
- Persson M, "The accuracy of a high-precision digitizer for CAD", CAM of crowns, 1995, pp.74, 223~229
- Naidu D, "Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of the iOC intraoral scanner: a comparison of tooth widths and Bolton ratios", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 144, pp.304~310 (2013)
- Flügge TV, "Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 144, pp.471~478 (2013)