A comparison of marginal fit of glass infiltrated alumina copings fabricated using two different techniques and the effect of firing cycles over them
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
PURPOSE. This study evaluated marginal fit of glass infiltrated alumina cores fabricated using two techniques and their marginal stability after firing cycles of veneering porcelain. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Fifteen standardized all-ceramic crowns were fabricated on a metal die using each technique: slip cast technique of VITA In-Ceram sprint Alumina (Group A as control) and plastic foil matrix technique of Turkom-Cera fused alumina core system (Group B). Copings were compared between groups and within groups at coping stage and after firing each layer of veneering porcelain. A device was used to standardize seating of copings on the metal die and positioning of the specimens under the microscope after each stage of fabrication. The specimens were not cemented and marginal gap was measured using an image analyzing software (Imagepro Express) on the photographs captured under an optical microscope. Two tailed unpaired‘ t test’was used to compare marginal gaps in two groups and one way ANOVA was used to analyze marginal distortion within each group at 95% confidence interval. RESULTS. The marginal gap was smaller at the coping stage in group B (60 + 30 μm) than group A (81 + 21 μm) with statistical significance. After firing of veneering porcelain the difference was insignificant. At the final stage, both groups exhibited lower mean marginal gaps than at the initial coping stage with the difference of 11.75 μm for group A and 11.94 μm for group B, but it was statistically insignificant due to high value of standard deviation. CONCLUSION. Within the limitations of this study, it was concluded that both techniques produced copings with comparable and acceptable marginal fit and marginal stability on firing veneering porcelain.
Abstract
PURPOSE. This study evaluated marginal fit of glass infiltrated alumina cores fabricated using two techniques and their marginal stability after firing cycles of veneering porcelain. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Fifteen standardized all-ceramic crowns were fabricated on a metal die using each technique: slip cast technique of VITA In-Ceram sprint Alumina (Group A as control) and plastic foil matrix technique of Turkom-Cera fused alumina core system (Group B). Copings were compared between groups and within groups at coping stage and after firing each layer of veneering porcelain. A device was used to standardize seating of copings on the metal die and positioning of the specimens under the microscope after each stage of fabrication. The specimens were not cemented and marginal gap was measured using an image analyzing software (Imagepro Express) on the photographs captured under an optical microscope. Two tailed unpaired‘ t test’was used to compare marginal gaps in two groups and one way ANOVA was used to analyze marginal distortion within each group at 95% confidence interval. RESULTS. The marginal gap was smaller at the coping stage in group B (60 + 30 μm) than group A (81 + 21 μm) with statistical significance. After firing of veneering porcelain the difference was insignificant. At the final stage, both groups exhibited lower mean marginal gaps than at the initial coping stage with the difference of 11.75 μm for group A and 11.94 μm for group B, but it was statistically insignificant due to high value of standard deviation. CONCLUSION. Within the limitations of this study, it was concluded that both techniques produced copings with comparable and acceptable marginal fit and marginal stability on firing veneering porcelain.
참고문헌 (51)
- Giordano RA, "Dental ceramic restorative systems", Compend Contin Educ Dent, 17, pp.779~794 (1996)
- Raigrodski AJ, "Contemporary materials and technologies for allceramic fixed partial dentures: a review of the literature", J Prosthet Dent, 92, pp.557~562 (2004)
- Conrad HJ, "Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review", J Prosthet Dent, 98, pp.389~404 (2007)
- Felton DA, "Effect of in vivo crown margin discrepancies on periodontal health", J Prosthet Dent, 65, pp.357~364 (1991)
- Sorensen JA, "A rationale for comparison of plaque-retaining properties of crown systems", J Prosthet Dent, 62, pp.264~269 (1989)
- Alkumru H, "Factors affecting the fit of porcelain jacket crowns", Br Dent J, 164, pp.39~43 (1988)
- Waerhaug J, "Histologic considerations which govern where the margins of restorations should be located in relation to gingiva", Dent Clin North Am, 4, pp.161~176 (1960)
- Lo¨e H, "Reactions to marginal periodontal tissues to restorative procedures", Int Dent J, 18, pp.759~778 (1968)
- Orstavik D, "In vitro attachment of Streptococcus sanguis to dental crown and bridge cements", J Oral Rehabil, 3, pp.139~144 (1976)
- Faucher RR, "Distortion related to margin design in porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations", J Prosthet Dent, 43, pp.149~155 (1980)
- Tuntiprawon M, "The effect of cement thickness on the fracture strength of all-ceramic crowns", Aust Dent J, 40, pp.17~21 (1995)
- McLean JW, "The reinforcement of dental porcelain with ceramic oxides", Br Dent J, 119, pp.251~267 (1965)
- Jones DW, "Development of dental ceramics. An historical perspective", Dent Clin North Am, 29, pp.621~644 (1985)
- Pera P, "In vitro marginal adaptation of alumina porcelain ceramic crowns", J Prosthet Dent, 72, pp.585~590 (1994)
- Sorensen JA, "A standardized method for determination of crown margin fidelity", J Prosthet Dent, 64, pp.18~24 (1990)
- Lui JL, "The effect of firing shrinkage on the marginal fit of porcelain jacket crowns", Br Dent J, 149, pp.43~45 (1980)
- Sulaiman F, "A comparison of the marginal fit of In-Ceram, IPS Empress, and Procera crowns", Int J Prosthodont, 10, pp.478~484 (1997)
- Strating H, "Evaluation of the marginal integrity of ceramometal restorations. Part I", J Prosthet Dent, 46, pp.59~65 (1981)
- Christensen GJ, "Marginal fit of gold inlay castings", J Prosthet Dent, 16, pp.297~305 (1966)
- Shillingburg HT Jr, "Preparation design and margin distortion in porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations", J Prosthet Dent, 29, pp.276~284 (1973)
- Buchanan WT, "The effect of repeated firings and strength on marginal distortion in two ceramometal systems", J Prosthet Dent, 45, pp.502~506 (1981)
- Denissen H, "Marginal fit and short-term clinical performance of porcelain-veneered CICERO, CEREC, and Procera onlays", J Prosthet Dent, 84, pp.506~513 (2000)
- 여인성, "In vitro marginal fit of three all-ceramic crown systems", JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 90(5), pp.459~464, MOSBY-ELSEVIER
- Att W, "Marginal adaptation of three different zirconium dioxide three-unit fixed dental prostheses", J Prosthet Dent, 101, pp.239~247 (2009)
- Lofstrom LH, "Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of clinically cemented cast gold restorations", J Prosthet Dent, 61, pp.664~669 (1989)
- Hamaguchi H, "Marginal distortion of the porcelain- bonded-to-metal complete crown: an SEM study", J Prosthet Dent, 47, pp.146~153 (1982)
- Gemalmaz D, "Marginal fit changes during porcelain firing cycles", J Prosthet Dent, 73, pp.49~54 (1995)
- Balkaya MC, "Influence of firing cycles on the margin distortion of 3 all-ceramic crown systems", J Prosthet Dent, 93, pp.346~355 (2005)
- May KB, "Precision of fit: the Procera AllCeram crown", J Prosthet Dent, 80, pp.394~404 (1998)
- McLean JW, "The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique", Br Dent J, 131, pp.107~111 (1971)
- Chan C, "Scanning electron microscopic studies of the marginal fit of three esthetic crowns", Quintessence Int, 20, pp.189~193 (1989)
- Vahidi F, "Evaluation of marginal adaptation of all-ceramic crowns and metal ceramic crowns", J Prosthet Dent, 66, pp.426~431 (1991)
- Rinke S, "Marginal accuracy and fracture strength of conventional and copy-milled all-ceramic crowns", Int J Prosthodont, 8, pp.303~310 (1995)
- Hung SH, "Marginal fit of porcelain- fused-to-metal and two types of ceramic crown", J Prosthet Dent, 63, pp.26~31 (1990)
- Davis DR, "Comparison of fit of two types of all-ceramic crowns", J Prosthet Dent, 59, pp.12~16 (1988)
- Weaver JD, "Marginal adaptation of castable ceramic crowns", J Prosthet Dent, 66, pp.747~753 (1991)
- Holmes JR, "Marginal fit of castable ceramic crowns", J Prosthet Dent, 67, pp.594~599 (1992)
- Shearer B, "Influence of marginal configuration and porcelain addition on the fit of In-Ceram crowns", Biomaterials, 17, pp.1891~1895 (1996)
- Boening KW, "Clinical fit of Procera AllCeram crowns", J Prosthet Dent, 84, pp.419~424 (2000)
- Beschnidt SM, "Evaluation of the marginal accuracy of different all-ceramic crown systems after simulation in the artificial mouth", J Oral Rehabil, 26, pp.582~593 (1999)
- Chan C, "The marginal fit of Cerestore all ceramic crowns - A Primary report", Quintessence Int, 6, pp.399~402 (1985)
- Komine F, "Influence of framework configuration on the marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide ceramic anterior four-unit frameworks", Acta Odontol Scand, 63, pp.361~366 (2005)
- Stappert CF, "Marginal adaptation of three-unit fixed partial dentures constructed from pressed ceramic systems", Br Dent J, 196, pp.766~780 (2004)
- Grey NJ, "In vitro comparison of conventional crowns and a new all-ceramic system", J Dent, 21, pp.47~51 (1993)
- Wolfart S, "Clinical evaluation of marginal fit of a new experimental all-ceramic system before and after cementation", Int J Prosthodont, 16, pp.587~592 (2003)
- Reich S, "Clinical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD", CAM systems, 2005, pp.113, 174~179
- Stappert CF, "Marginal adaptation of three-unit fixed partial dentures constructed from pressed ceramic systems", Br Dent J, 196, pp.766~780 (2004)
- Ash MM, "The Permanent Maxillary Premolars. In: Wheeler’s Dental Anatomy, Physiology, and occlusion. 8th Ed", pp.243~ (2003), Imprint of Elsevier Pub
- Rosenstiel SF, "Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics. 3rd Ed", pp.643~672 (2002), Mosby
- Holmes JR, "Considerations in measurement of marginal fit", J Prosthet Dent, 62, pp.405~408 (1989)
- Groten M, "Determination of the minimum number of marginal gap measurements required for practical in-vitro testing", J Prosthet Dent, 83, pp.40~49 (2000)