Comparison of removal torques between laser-treated and SLAtreated implant surfaces in rabbit tibiae
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to compare removal torques and surface topography between laser treated and sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched (SLA) treated implants. ATERIALS AND METHODS. Laser treated implants (experimental group) and SLA-treated implants (control group) 8 mm in length and 3.4 mm in diameter were inserted into both sides of the tibiae of 12 rabbits. Surface analysis was accomplished using a field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM; Hitachi S-4800; Japan) under ×25, ×150 and ×1,000 magnification. Surface components were analyzed using energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS). Rabbits were sacrificed after a 6-week healing period. The removal torque was measured using the MGT-12 digital torque meter (Mark-10 Co., Copiague, NY, USA). RESULTS. In the experimental group, the surface analysis showed uniform porous structures under ×25, ×150 and ×1,000 magnification. Pore sizes in the experimental group were 20-40 mm and consisted of numerous small pores, whereas pore sizes in the control group were 0.5-2.0 mm. EDS analysis showed no significant difference between the two groups. The mean removal torque in the lasertreated and the SLA-treated implant groups were 79.4 Ncm (SD = 20.4; range 34.6-104.3 Ncm) and 52.7 Ncm (SD = 17.2; range 18.7-73.8 Ncm), respectively. The removal torque in the laser-treated surface implant group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P=.004). CONCLUSION. In this study, removal torque values were significantly higher for laser-treated surface implants than for SLA-treated surface implants.
Abstract
PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to compare removal torques and surface topography between laser treated and sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched (SLA) treated implants. ATERIALS AND METHODS. Laser treated implants (experimental group) and SLA-treated implants (control group) 8 mm in length and 3.4 mm in diameter were inserted into both sides of the tibiae of 12 rabbits. Surface analysis was accomplished using a field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM; Hitachi S-4800; Japan) under ×25, ×150 and ×1,000 magnification. Surface components were analyzed using energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS). Rabbits were sacrificed after a 6-week healing period. The removal torque was measured using the MGT-12 digital torque meter (Mark-10 Co., Copiague, NY, USA). RESULTS. In the experimental group, the surface analysis showed uniform porous structures under ×25, ×150 and ×1,000 magnification. Pore sizes in the experimental group were 20-40 mm and consisted of numerous small pores, whereas pore sizes in the control group were 0.5-2.0 mm. EDS analysis showed no significant difference between the two groups. The mean removal torque in the lasertreated and the SLA-treated implant groups were 79.4 Ncm (SD = 20.4; range 34.6-104.3 Ncm) and 52.7 Ncm (SD = 17.2; range 18.7-73.8 Ncm), respectively. The removal torque in the laser-treated surface implant group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P=.004). CONCLUSION. In this study, removal torque values were significantly higher for laser-treated surface implants than for SLA-treated surface implants.
참고문헌 (23)
- Albrektsson T., "Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man", Acta Orthop Scand, 52, pp.155~170 (1981)
- Roberts WE., "Osseointegration in oral rehabilitation", pp.163~164 (1993), Quintessence
- Carlsson L., "Removal torques for polished and rough titanium implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 3, pp.21~24 (1988)
- Gotfredsen K., "Histomorphometric and removal torque analysis for TiO2-blasted titanium implants. An experimental study on dogs", Clin Oral Implants Res, 3, pp.77~84 (1992)
- Cordioli G., "Removal torque and histomorphometric investigation of 4 different titanium surfaces : an experimental study in the rabbit tibia", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 15, pp.668~674 (2000)
- Klokkevold PR., "Osseointegration enhanced by chemical etching of the titanium surface. A torque removal study in the rabbit", Clin Oral Implants Res, 8, pp.442~447 (1997)
- Wennerberg A., "A histomorphometric and removal torque study of screw-shaped titanium implants with three different surface topographies", Clin Oral Implants Res, 6, pp.24~30 (1995)
- Ferguson SJ., "Biomechanical comparison of different surface modifications for dental implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 23, pp.1037~1046 (2008)
- Marin C., "The effect of alterations on resorbable blasting media processed implant surfaces on early bone healing : a study in rabbits", Implant Dent, 20, pp.167~177 (2011)
- Kang SH., "Comparison of removal torques for lasertreated titanium implants with anodized implants", J Craniofac Surg, 22, pp.1491~1495 (2011)
- Hofmann AA., "Progression of human bone ingrowth into porous-coated implants. Rate of bone ingrowth in humans", Acta Orthop Scand, 68, pp.161~166 (1997)
- Hall J., "Stimulation of directed bone growth at oxidized titanium implants by macroscopic grooves: an in vivo study", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 7, pp.S76~S82 (2005)
- Mangano C., "Bone response to modified titanium surface implants in nonhuman primates(Papio ursinus)and humans : histological evaluation", J Oral Implantol, 34, pp.17~24 (2008)
- Schwartz Z., "Effect of titanium surface roughness on chondrocyte proliferation, matrix production, and differentiation depends on the state of cell maturation", J Biomed Mater Res, 30, pp.145~155 (1996)
- Hallgren C., "An in vivo study of bone response to implants topographically modified by laser micromachining", Biomaterials, 24, pp.701~710 (2003)
- Gaggl A., "Scanning electron microscopical analysis of laser-treated titanium implant surfaces--a comparative study", Biomaterials, 21, pp.1067~1073 (2000)
- Cho SA., "A removal torque of the laser-treated titanium implants in rabbit tibia", Biomaterials, 24, pp.4859~4863 (2003)
- Kang SH., "Comparison of removal torques for lasertreated titanium implants with anodized implants", J Craniofac Surg, 22, pp.1491~1495 (2011)
- Palmquist A., "Biomechanical, histological and ultrastructural analyses of laser micro-and nano-structured titanium implant after 6 months in rabbit", J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 97, pp.289~298 (2011)
- Wie H., "Hot isostatic pressing-processed hydroxyapatite-coated titanium implants : light microscopic and scanning electron microscopy investigations", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 13, pp.837~844 (1998)
- Han CH., "Quantitative and qualitative investigations of surface enlarged titanium and titanium alloy implants", Clin Oral Implants Res, 9, pp.1~10 (1998)
- Sennerby L., "Early tissue response to titanium implants inserted in rabbit cortical bone. Part I. Light microscopic obserrvations", J Mater Sci Mater Med, 4, pp.240~250 (1993)
- Rong M., "The early osseointegration of the laser-treated and acid-etched dental implants surface : an experimental study in rabbits", J Mater Sci Mater Med, 20, pp.1721~1728 (2009)