Comparison of removal torques between laser-etched and modified sandblasted acid-etched Ti implant surfaces in rabbit tibias
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effects of two different implant surface treatments on initial bone connection by comparing the Removal Torque Values (RTQs) at 7 and 10 days after chemically modified, sandblasted, large-grit and acid-etched (modSLA), and Laser-etched (LE) Ti implant placements. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Twenty modSLA and 20 LE implants were installed on the left and right tibias of 20 adult rabbits. RTQs were measured after 7 and 10 days in 10 rabbits each. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) photographs of the two implants were observed by using Quanta FEG 650 from the FEI company (Hillsboro, OR, USA). Analyses of surface elements and components were conducted using energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS, Horiba, Kyoto, Japan). RESULTS. The mean RTQs were 12.29 ± 0.830 and 12.19 ± 0.713 Ncm after 7 days (P=.928) and 16.47 ± 1.324 and 16.17 ± 1.165 Ncm after 10 days (P=.867) for LE and modSLA, respectively, indicating no significant inter-group differences. Pore sizes in the LE were 40 μm and consisted of numerous small pores, whereas pore sizes in the modSLA were 5 μm. In the EDS analysis, Ti, O, and C were the only three elements found in the LE surfaces. Na, Ca, Cl, and K were also observed in modSLA, in addition to Ti, O, and C. CONCLUSION. The implants showed no significant difference in biomechanical bond strength to bone in early-stage osseointegration. LE implant can be considered an excellent surface treatment method in addition to the modSLA implant and can be applied to the early loading of the prosthesis clinically.
Abstract
PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effects of two different implant surface treatments on initial bone connection by comparing the Removal Torque Values (RTQs) at 7 and 10 days after chemically modified, sandblasted, large-grit and acid-etched (modSLA), and Laser-etched (LE) Ti implant placements. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Twenty modSLA and 20 LE implants were installed on the left and right tibias of 20 adult rabbits. RTQs were measured after 7 and 10 days in 10 rabbits each. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) photographs of the two implants were observed by using Quanta FEG 650 from the FEI company (Hillsboro, OR, USA). Analyses of surface elements and components were conducted using energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS, Horiba, Kyoto, Japan). RESULTS. The mean RTQs were 12.29 ± 0.830 and 12.19 ± 0.713 Ncm after 7 days (P=.928) and 16.47 ± 1.324 and 16.17 ± 1.165 Ncm after 10 days (P=.867) for LE and modSLA, respectively, indicating no significant inter-group differences. Pore sizes in the LE were 40 μm and consisted of numerous small pores, whereas pore sizes in the modSLA were 5 μm. In the EDS analysis, Ti, O, and C were the only three elements found in the LE surfaces. Na, Ca, Cl, and K were also observed in modSLA, in addition to Ti, O, and C. CONCLUSION. The implants showed no significant difference in biomechanical bond strength to bone in early-stage osseointegration. LE implant can be considered an excellent surface treatment method in addition to the modSLA implant and can be applied to the early loading of the prosthesis clinically.
참고문헌 (32)
- Albrektsson T, "Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man", Acta Orthop Scand, 52, pp.155~170 (1981)[DOI]
- Branemark PI, "Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies", Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg, 3, pp.81~100 (1969)[DOI]
- Smeets R, "Impact of dental implant surface modifications on osseointegration", Biomed Res Int, 2016, pp.6285620~ (2016)
- Chen CJ, "Effects of surface conditions of titanium dental implants on bacterial adhesion", Photomed Laser Surg, 34, pp.379~388 (2016)
- Shah FA, "Laser-modified surface enhances osseointegration and biomechanical anchorage of commercially pure titanium implants for bone-anchored hearing systems", PLoS One, 11, pp.e0157504~ (2016)[DOI]
- Sang-Hun Park, "Comparison of removal torques of SLActive® implant and blasted, laser-treated titanium implant in rabbit tibia bone healed with concentrated growth factor application", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 8(2), pp.110~115 (2016), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- Junker R, "Effects of implant surface coatings and composition on bone integration: a systematic review", Clin Oral Implants Res, 20, pp.185~206 (2009)[DOI]
- Wong M, "Effect of surface topology on the osseointegration of implant materials in trabecular bone", J Biomed Mater Res, 29, pp.1567~1575 (1995)[DOI]
- von Wilmowsky C, "Implants in bone: part I. A current overview about tissue response, surface modifications and future perspectives", Oral Maxillofac Surg, 18, pp.243~257 (2014)[DOI]
- Dohan Ehrenfest DM, "Classification of osseointegrated implant surfaces: materials, chemistry and topography", Trends Biotechnol, 28, pp.198~206 (2010)[DOI]
- Zinelis S, "Surface characterization of SLActive dental implants", Eur J Esthet Dent, 7, pp.72~92 (2012)
- Buser D, "Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface", J Dent Res, 83, pp.529~533 (2004)[DOI]
- Cochran DL, "The use of reduced healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: early results from clinical trials on ITI SLA implants", Clin Oral Implants Res, 13, pp.144~153 (2002)[DOI]
- Ferguson SJ, "Biomechanical evaluation of the interfacial strength of a chemically modified sandblasted and acid-etched titanium surface", J Biomed Mater Res A, 78, pp.291~297 (2006)
- Marin C, "The effect of alterations on resorbable blasting media processed implant surfaces on early bone healing: a study in rabbits", Implant Dent, 20, pp.167~177 (2011)[DOI]
- Lee JT, "Biomechanical evaluation of laser-etched Ti implant surfaces vs. chemically modified SLA Ti implant surfaces: Removal torque and resonance frequency analysis in rabbit tibias", J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 61, pp.299~307 (2016)[DOI]
- Gaggl A, "Scanning electron microscopical analysis of laser-treated titanium implant surfaces-a comparative study", Biomaterials, 21, pp.1067~1073 (2000)[DOI]
- Cho SA, "A removal torque of the laser-treated titanium implants in rabbit tibia", Biomaterials, 24, pp.4859~4863 (2003)[DOI]
- Roberts WE, "Osseous adaptation to continuous loading of rigid endosseous implants", Am J Orthod, 86, pp.95~111 (1984)[DOI]
- Johansson C, "Integration of screw implants in the rabbit: a 1-year follow-up of removal torque of titanium implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2, pp.69~75 (1987)
- Johansson CB, "A removal torque and histomorphometric study of commercially pure niobium and titanium implants in rabbit bone", Clin Oral Implants Res, 2, pp.24~29 (1991)[DOI]
- Johansson CB, "A removal torque and histomorphometric study of bone tissue reactions to commercially pure titanium and Vitallium implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 6, pp.437~441 (1991)
- Ivanoff CJ, "Influence of mono- and bicortical anchorage on the integration of titanium implants. A study in the rabbit tibia", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 25, pp.229~235 (1996)[DOI]
- Sennerby L, "A morphometric and biomechanic comparison of titanium implants inserted in rabbit cortical and cancellous bone", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 7, pp.62~71 (1992)
- Albrektsson T, "The preformed autologous bone graft. An experimental study in the rabbit", Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg, 12, pp.215~223 (1978)[DOI]
- Raghavendra S, "Early wound healing around endosseous implants: a review of the literature", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 20, pp.425~431 (2005)
- Brett PM, "Roughness response genes in osteoblasts", Bone, 35, pp.124~133 (2004)[DOI]
- Bagno A, "Surface treatments and roughness properties of Ti-based biomaterials", J Mater Sci Mater Med, 15, pp.935~949 (2004)[DOI]
- Kang SH, "Comparison of removal torques for lasertreated titanium implants with anodized implants", J Craniofac Surg, 22, pp.1491~1495 (2011)[DOI]
- Faeda RS, "Biological performance of chemical hydroxyapatite coating associated with implant surface modification by laser beam: biomechanical study in rabbit tibias", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 67, pp.1706~1715 (2009)[DOI]
- Rong M, "The early osseointegration of the laser-treated and acid-etched dental implants surface: an experimental study in rabbits", J Mater Sci Mater Med, 20, pp.1721~1728 (2009)[DOI]
- Donos N, "Gene expression profile of osseointegration of a hydrophilic compared with a hydrophobic microrough implant surface", Clin Oral Implants Res, 22, pp.365~372 (2011)[DOI]