본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Influence of preparation depths on the fracture load of customized zirconia abutments with titanium insert

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

PURPOSE. This study evaluated the fracture load of customized zirconia abutments with titanium insert according to preparation depths, with or without 5-year artificial aging. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Thirty-six identical lithium disilicate crowns (IPS e.max press) were fabricated to replace a maxillary right central incisor and cemented to the customized zirconia abutment with titanium insert on a 4.5×10 mm titanium fixture. Abutments were fabricated with 3 preparation depths (0.5 mm, 0.7 mm, and 0.9 mm). Half of the samples were then processed using thermocycling (temperature: 5-55ºC, dwelling time: 120s) and chewing simulation (1,200,000 cycles, 49 N load). All specimens were classified into 6 groups depending on the preparation depth and artificial aging (non-artificial aging groups: N5, N7, N9; artificial aging groups: A5, A7, A9). Static load was applied at 135 degrees to the implant axis in a universal testing machine. Statistical analyses of the results were performed using 1-way ANOVA, 2-way ANOVA, independent t-test and multiple linear regression. RESULTS. The fracture loads were 539.28 ± 63.11 N (N5), 406.56 ± 28.94 N (N7), 366.66 ± 30.19 N (N9), 392.61 ± 50.57 N (A5), 317.94 ± 30.05 N (A7), and 292.74 ± 37.15 N (A9). The fracture load of group N5 was significantly higher than those of group N7 and N9 (P<.017). Consequently, the fracture load of group A5 was also significantly higher than those of group A7 and A9 (P<.05). After artificial aging, the fracture load was significantly decreased in all groups with various preparation depths (P<.05). CONCLUSION. The fracture load of a single anterior implant restored with lithium disilicate crown on zirconia abutment with titanium insert differed depending on the preparation depths. After 5-year artificial aging, the fracture loads of all preparation groups decreased significantly.

Abstract

PURPOSE. This study evaluated the fracture load of customized zirconia abutments with titanium insert according to preparation depths, with or without 5-year artificial aging. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Thirty-six identical lithium disilicate crowns (IPS e.max press) were fabricated to replace a maxillary right central incisor and cemented to the customized zirconia abutment with titanium insert on a 4.5×10 mm titanium fixture. Abutments were fabricated with 3 preparation depths (0.5 mm, 0.7 mm, and 0.9 mm). Half of the samples were then processed using thermocycling (temperature: 5-55ºC, dwelling time: 120s) and chewing simulation (1,200,000 cycles, 49 N load). All specimens were classified into 6 groups depending on the preparation depth and artificial aging (non-artificial aging groups: N5, N7, N9; artificial aging groups: A5, A7, A9). Static load was applied at 135 degrees to the implant axis in a universal testing machine. Statistical analyses of the results were performed using 1-way ANOVA, 2-way ANOVA, independent t-test and multiple linear regression. RESULTS. The fracture loads were 539.28 ± 63.11 N (N5), 406.56 ± 28.94 N (N7), 366.66 ± 30.19 N (N9), 392.61 ± 50.57 N (A5), 317.94 ± 30.05 N (A7), and 292.74 ± 37.15 N (A9). The fracture load of group N5 was significantly higher than those of group N7 and N9 (P<.017). Consequently, the fracture load of group A5 was also significantly higher than those of group A7 and A9 (P<.05). After artificial aging, the fracture load was significantly decreased in all groups with various preparation depths (P<.05). CONCLUSION. The fracture load of a single anterior implant restored with lithium disilicate crown on zirconia abutment with titanium insert differed depending on the preparation depths. After 5-year artificial aging, the fracture loads of all preparation groups decreased significantly.

참고문헌 (37)

  1. Pjetursson BE, "Comparison of survival and complication rates of tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and implant-supported FDPs and single crowns (SCs)", Clin Oral Implants Res, 18, pp.97~113 (2007)
  2. Jung RE, "A systematic review of the 5-year survival and complication rates of implant-supported single crowns", Clin Oral Implants Res, 19, pp.119~130 (2008)
  3. Valenti M, "Retrospective survival analysis of 261lithium disilicate crowns in a private general practice", Quintessence Int, 40, pp.573~579 (2009)
  4. Wassermann A, "Clinical long-term results of VITA In-Ceram Classic crowns and fixed partial dentures: A systematic literature review", Int J Prosthodont, 19, pp.355~363 (2006)
  5. Prestipino V, "All-ceramic implant abutments: esthetic indications", J Esthet Dent, 8, pp.255~262 (1996)
  6. Abrahamsson I, "The mucosal attachment at different abutments. An experimental study in dogs", J Clin Periodontol, 25, pp.721~727 (1998)
  7. Prestipino V, "Esthetic high-strength implant abutments. Part I", J Esthet Dent, 5, pp.29~36 (1993)
  8. Prestipino V, "Esthetic high-strength implant abutments. Part II", J Esthet Dent, 5, pp.63~68 (1993)
  9. Sailer I, "A systematic review of the performance of ceramic and metal implant abutments supporting fixed implant reconstructions", Clin Oral Implants Res, 20, pp.4~31 (2009)
  10. Sailer I, "In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 24, pp.850~858 (2009)
  11. Truninger TC, "Bending moments of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections after aging and chewing simulation", Clin Oral Implants Res, 23, pp.12~18 (2012)
  12. Aboushelib MN, "Zirconia implant abutment fracture:clinical case reports and precautions for use", Int J Prosthodont, 22, pp.616~619 (2009)
  13. Kunii J, "Effect of sintering on the marginal and internal fit of CAD", CAM-fabricated zirconia frameworks, 2007, pp.26, 820~826
  14. Park JI, "Comparison of fracture resistance and fit accuracy of customized zirconia abutments with prefabricated zirconia abutments in internal hexagonal implants", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 15, pp.769~778 (2013)
  15. Koutayas SO, "Influence of preparation mode and depth on the fracture strength of zirconia ceramic abutments restored with lithium disilicate crowns", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 27, pp.839~848 (2012)
  16. Mitsias M, "Influence of zirconia abutment preparation on the fracture strength of single implant lithium disilicate crowns after chewing simulation", Clin Oral Implants Res, 25, pp.675~682 (2014)
  17. Att W, "Fracture resistance of single-tooth implant-supported all-ceramic restorations: an in vitro study", J Prosthet Dent, 95, pp.111~116 (2006)
  18. Att W, "Fracture resistance of single-tooth implant-supported all-ceramic restorations after exposure to the artificial mouth", J Oral Rehabil, 33, pp.380~386 (2006)
  19. Aramouni P, "Fracture resistance and failure location of zirconium and metallic implant abutments", J Contemp Dent Pract, 9, pp.41~48 (2008)
  20. Adatia ND, "Fracture resistance of yttria-stabilized zirconia dental implant abutments", J Prosthodont, 18, pp.17~22 (2009)
  21. Kim S, "Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutments with CAD", CAM commercially fabricated zirconia implant abutments, 2009, pp.101, 226~230
  22. Butz F, "Survival rate, fracture strength and failure mode of ceramic implant abutments after chewing simulation", J Oral Rehabil, 32, pp.838~843 (2005)
  23. "ISO 14801. Dentistry-fatigue test for endosseous dental implants. International Standards Organization (ISO)", Geneva, ~ (2005)
  24. Tsukiyama T, "Comparison of the anatomic crown width", length ratios of unworn and worn maxillary teeth in Asian and white subjects, 2012, pp.107, 11~16
  25. "ISO 10477. Dentistry. Polymer-based crown and bridge materials. International Standards Organization (ISO)", Geneva, ~ (1996)
  26. Gale MS, "Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations", J Dent, 27, pp.89~99 (1999)
  27. Krejci I, "In-vitro test results of the evaluation of dental restoration systems. Correlation with in-vivo results", Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed, 100, pp.1445~1449 (1990)
  28. Kellerhoff RK, "In vitro fracture strength and thermal shock resistance of metal-ceramic crowns with cast and machined AuTi frameworks", J Prosthet Dent, 97, pp.209~215 (2007)
  29. Culp L, "Lithium disilicate: the restorative material of multiple options", Compend Contin Educ Dent, 31, pp.716~720 (2010)
  30. Strub JR, "Fracture strength of 5 different allceramic crown systems", Int J Prosthodont, 11, pp.602~609 (1998)
  31. Attia A, "Influence of cyclic loading and luting agents on the fracture load of two all-ceramic crown systems", J Prosthet Dent, 92, pp.551~556 (2004)
  32. Pera P, "In vitro marginal adaptation of alumina porcelain ceramic crowns", J Prosthet Dent, 72, pp.585~590 (1994)
  33. Shearer B, "Influence of marginal configuration and porcelain addition on the fit of In-Ceram crowns", Biomaterials, 17, pp.1891~1895 (1996)
  34. De Boever JA, "Functional occlusal forces: an investigation by telemetry", J Prosthet Dent, 40, pp.326~333 (1978)
  35. Waltimo A, "A novel bite force recorder and maximal isometric bite force values for healthy young adults", Scand J Dent Res, 101, pp.171~175 (1993)
  36. Swab JJ, "Low temperature degradation of Y-TZP materials", J Mater Sci, 26, pp.6706~6714 (1991)
  37. Guazzato M, "Strength, fracture toughness and microstructure of a selection of allceramic materials. Part II. Zirconia-based dental ceramics", Dent Mater, 20, pp.449~456 (2004)

관련 논문AI추천

Fracture resistance of implantsupported monolithic crowns cemented to zirconia hybridabutments: zirconia-based crowns vs. lithium disilicate crownsAndreas Öchsner, Noor Nawafleh, Roy George, Shareen H Elshiyab대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2018 · 제10권 제1호Fracture resistance of zirconia and resin nano ceramic implant abutments according to thickness after thermocycling이정원, 이주희, 차현석대한치과보철학회 · 대한치과보철학회지2017 · 제55권 제2호Removal torque of a two-piece zirconia abutment with a novel titanium component in an internal connection implant system after dynamic cyclic loading이주희대한치과보철학회 · 대한치과보철학회지2017 · 제55권 제2호Effect of core design on fracture resistance of zirconia-lithium disilicate anterior bilayered crowns고경호, 박찬진, 조리라, 허윤혁대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2020 · 제12권 제4호The effect of a titanium socket with a zirconia abutment on screw loosening after thermocycling in an internally connected implant: a preliminary study경규영, 이주희, 차현석대한턱관절교합학회 · 구강회복응용과학지2017 · 제33권 제2호Influence of misfit direction and abutment type on torque loss and fracture strength of implant-supported fixed dental prosthesesDaniel Kules, Ieva Gendviliene, Ingrida Mischitz, Liudas Auškalnis, Maisa Haiek, Mutlu Özcan, Tan Fırat Eyüboğlu, Vygandas Rutkūnas대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2025 · 제17권 제6호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)