Six-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic CAD-CAM versus metal-ceramic crowns
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. To assess the clinical performance of monolithic CAD-CAM lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (LDGC) crowns and metal-ceramic (MC) crowns provided by predoctoral students. This study also assessed the effects of patient and provider-related factors on their clinical performance as well as patient preference for these types of crowns. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Twenty-five patients who received 50 crowns (25 LDGC CAD-CAM and 25 MC) provided by predoctoral students were retrospectively examined. LDGC CAD-CAM crowns were milled in-house using the CEREC Bluecam system and cemented with either RelyX Unicem or Calibra Esthetic resin cements. MC crowns were cemented with RelyX Unicem cement. Clinical assessment of the crowns and the supporting periodontal structures were performed following the modified California Dental Association (CDA) criteria. Patients’ preference was recorded using a visual analog scale (VAS). The results were statistically analyzed using log-rank test, Pearson Chi-squared test and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. RESULTS. Twelve complications were observed in the MC crown group (9-esthetic, 2-technical and 1-biological). In comparison, 2 complications in the LDGC CAD-CAM crown group were observed (1-technical and 1-esthetic). The 6-year cumulative survival rates for MC crowns and LDGC CAD-CAM were 90.8% and 96%, respectively, whereas the success rates were 83.4% and 96%, respectively. Overall, patients preferred the esthetic outcomes of LDGC CAD-CAM crowns over MC crowns. CONCLUSION. The high survival and success rates, low number of complications, and the high level of patients’ acceptance of monolithic LDGC CAD-CAM crowns lend them well as predictable and viable alternatives to the “gold standard” MC crowns.
Abstract
PURPOSE. To assess the clinical performance of monolithic CAD-CAM lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (LDGC) crowns and metal-ceramic (MC) crowns provided by predoctoral students. This study also assessed the effects of patient and provider-related factors on their clinical performance as well as patient preference for these types of crowns. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Twenty-five patients who received 50 crowns (25 LDGC CAD-CAM and 25 MC) provided by predoctoral students were retrospectively examined. LDGC CAD-CAM crowns were milled in-house using the CEREC Bluecam system and cemented with either RelyX Unicem or Calibra Esthetic resin cements. MC crowns were cemented with RelyX Unicem cement. Clinical assessment of the crowns and the supporting periodontal structures were performed following the modified California Dental Association (CDA) criteria. Patients’ preference was recorded using a visual analog scale (VAS). The results were statistically analyzed using log-rank test, Pearson Chi-squared test and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. RESULTS. Twelve complications were observed in the MC crown group (9-esthetic, 2-technical and 1-biological). In comparison, 2 complications in the LDGC CAD-CAM crown group were observed (1-technical and 1-esthetic). The 6-year cumulative survival rates for MC crowns and LDGC CAD-CAM were 90.8% and 96%, respectively, whereas the success rates were 83.4% and 96%, respectively. Overall, patients preferred the esthetic outcomes of LDGC CAD-CAM crowns over MC crowns. CONCLUSION. The high survival and success rates, low number of complications, and the high level of patients’ acceptance of monolithic LDGC CAD-CAM crowns lend them well as predictable and viable alternatives to the “gold standard” MC crowns.
참고문헌 (44)
- Li RW, "Ceramic dental biomaterials and CAD", CAM technology : state of the art, 2014, pp.58, 208~216
- Zarone F, ""Digitally Oriented Materials" : focus on lithium disilicate ceramics", Int J Dent, 2016, pp.9840594~ (2016)
- Reich S, "Tooth-colored CAD", CAM monolithic restorations, 2015, pp.18, 131~146
- Harada K, "A comparative evaluation of the translucency of zirconias and lithium disilicate for monolithic restorations", J Prosthet Dent, 116, pp.257~263 (2016)
- Guess PC, "Monolithic CAD", CAM lithium disilicate versus veneered Y-TZP crowns : comparison of failure modes and reliability after fatigue, 2010, pp.23, 434~442
- Otto T, "Clinical performance of chairside CAD", CAM feldspathic ceramic posterior shoulder crowns and endocrowns up to 12 years, 2015, pp.18, 147~161
- Nejatidanesh F, "Clinical performance of CEREC AC Bluecam conservative ceramic restorations after five years-A retrospective study", J Dent, 43, pp.1076~1082 (2015)
- Sulaiman TA, "Survival rate of lithium disilicate restorations at 4 years : A retrospective study", J Prosthet Dent, 114, pp.364~366 (2015)
- Freire Y, "The marginal fit of CAD", CAM monolithic ceramic and metal-ceramic crowns, 2019, pp.28, 299~304
- Fasbinder DJ, "A clinical evaluation of chairside lithium disilicate CAD", CAM crowns : a two-year report, 2010, pp.141(Suppl 2), 10S~4S
- Reich S, "A preliminary study on the short-term efficacy of chairside computer-aided design", computer-assisted manufacturing-generated posterior lithium disilicate crowns, 2010, pp.23, 214~216
- Cortellini D, "Bonding lithium disilicate ceramic to feather-edge tooth preparations : a minimally invasive treatment concept", J Adhes Dent, 14, pp.7~10 (2012)
- Seydler B, "Clinical performance of two different CAD", CAM-fabricated ceramic crowns : 2-Year results, 2015, pp.114, 212~216
- Akın A, "Clinical marginal and internal adaptation of maxillary anterior single all-ceramic crowns and 2-year randomized controlled clinical trial", J Prosthodont, 24, pp.345~350 (2015)
- Rauch A, "Clinical survival of chair-side generated monolithic lithium disilicate crowns : 10-year results", Clin Oral Investig, 22, pp.1763~1769 (2018)
- Näpänkangas R, "Twenty-year follow-up of metal-ceramic single crowns : a retrospective study", Int J Prosthodont, 21, pp.307~311 (2008)
- Reitemeier B, "Metal-ceramic failure in noble metal crowns : 7-year results of a prospective clinical trial in private practices", Int J Prosthodont, 19, pp.397~399 (2006)
- Walton TR, "A 10-year longitudinal study of fixed prosthodontics : clinical characteristics and outcome of single-unit metal-ceramic crowns", Int J Prosthodont, 12, pp.519~526 (1999)
- Sailer I, "All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs)", Dent Mater, 31, pp.603~623 (2015)
- Rinke S, "A practice-based clinical evaluation of the survival and success of metal-ceramic and zirconia molar crowns : 5-year results", J Oral Rehabil, 43, pp.136~144 (2016)
- Pelaez J, "A four-year prospective clinical evaluation of zirconia and metal-ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses", Int J Prosthodont, 25, pp.451~458 (2012)
- Sailer I, "Randomized controlled clinical trial of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses : a 3-year follow-up", Int J Prosthodont, 22, pp.553~560 (2009)
- Heintze SD, "Survival of zirconia-and metal-supported fixed dental prostheses : a systematic review", Int J Prosthodont, 23, pp.493~502 (2010)
- Shillingburg HT, "Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics", pp.95~ (2012), Quintessence Publishing Co
- Lang NP, "Absence of bleeding on probing. An indicator of periodontal stability", J Clin Periodontol, 17, pp.714~721 (1990)
- Lang NP, "Monitoring disease during supportive periodontal treatment by bleeding on probing", Periodontol 2000, 12, pp.44~48 (1996)
- California Dental Association, "Guidelines for the assessment of clinical quality and professional performance", California Dental Association, ~ (1995)
- Pjetursson BE, "A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part I: Single crowns", Clin Oral Implants Res, 18(Suppl 3), pp.73~85 (2007)
- Ramfjord SP, "Subgingival curettage versus surgical elimination of periodontal pockets", J Periodontol, 39, pp.167~175 (1968)
- Lesaffre E, "The design and analysis of split-mouth studies : what statisticians and clinicians should know", Stat Med, 28, pp.3470~3482 (2009)
- Hujoel PP, "Validity issues in split-mouth trials", J Clin Periodontol, 19, pp.625~627 (1992)
- Behr M, "The clinical performance of porcelain-fused-to-metal precious alloy single crowns:chipping, recurrent caries, periodontitis, and loss of retention", Int J Prosthodont, 27, pp.153~160 (2014)
- Walton TR, "The up to 25-year survival and clinical performance of 2,340 high gold-based metal-ceramic single crowns", Int J Prosthodont, 26, pp.151~160 (2013)
- Goodacre CJ, "Clinical complications in fixed prosthodontics", J Prosthet Dent, 90, pp.31~41 (2003)
- Cheung GS, "Fate of vital pulps beneath a metal-ceramic crown or a bridge retainer", Int Endod J, 38, pp.521~530 (2005)
- Silva NR, "Reliability of reduced-thickness and thinly veneered lithium disilicate crowns", J Dent Res, 91, pp.305~310 (2012)
- Belli R, "Fracture Rates and Lifetime Estimations of CAD", CAM All-ceramic Restorations, 2016, pp.95, 67~73
- Valenti M, "Retrospective survival analysis of 110 lithium disilicate crowns with feather-edge marginal preparation", Int J Esthet Dent, 10, pp.246~257 (2015)
- Federlin M, "Effect of selective enamel etching on clinical performance of CAD", CAM partial ceramic crowns luted with a self-adhesive resin cement, 2014, pp.18, 1975~1984
- Peumans M, "Four-year clinical evaluation of a self-adhesive luting agent for ceramic inlays", Clin Oral Investig, 17, pp.739~750 (2013)
- Reitemeier B, "Effect of posterior crown margin placement on gingival health", J Prosthet Dent, 87, pp.167~172 (2002)
- Toman M, "Clinical evaluation of 121 lithium disilicate all-ceramic crowns up to 9 years", Quintessence Int, 46, pp.189~197 (2015)
- da Costa JB, "Evaluation of different methods of optical impression making on the marginal gap of onlays created with CEREC 3D", Oper Dent, 35, pp.324~329 (2010)
- Baig MR, "Evaluation of the marginal fit of a zirconia ceramic computer-aided machined(CAM)crown system", J Prosthet Dent, 104, pp.216~227 (2010)