Effects of inter-implant distance on the accuracy of intraoral scanner: An in vitro study
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. Several studies focused on the accuracy of intra-oral scanners in implant dentistry, but the data of inter-implant distances were not widely mentioned. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of distance between two implants on the surface distortion of scanned models generated by intra-oral scanners. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Three models with the distances between two fixed scan bodies of 7, 14, and 21 mm were fabricated and scanned with a highly precise D900L dental laboratory scanner as reference models. Fifteen scans were performed with TRIOS3 and CEREC Omnicam intra-oral scanners. Trueness, precision, and angle deviation of the test models were analyzed (α=.05). RESULTS. There was a significant difference among inter-implant distances inboth intraoral scanners (P <.001). The error of trueness and precision increased with the increasing inter-implant length, while the angle deviation did not show the same trend. A significant difference in the angle deviation was found among the inter-implant distance. The greatest angle deviation was reported in the 14-mm group of both scanners (P <.05). In contrast, the lowest angle deviation in the 21-mm group of the TR scanner and the 7-mm of the CR scanner was reported (P <.001). CONCLUSION. The inter-implant distance affected the accuracy of intra-oral scanner. The error of trueness and precision increased along with the increasing distance between two implants. However, the distortions were not clinically significant. Regarding angle deviation, the clinically significant angle deviation may be possible when using intra-oral scanners in the partially edentulous arch.
Abstract
PURPOSE. Several studies focused on the accuracy of intra-oral scanners in implant dentistry, but the data of inter-implant distances were not widely mentioned. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of distance between two implants on the surface distortion of scanned models generated by intra-oral scanners. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Three models with the distances between two fixed scan bodies of 7, 14, and 21 mm were fabricated and scanned with a highly precise D900L dental laboratory scanner as reference models. Fifteen scans were performed with TRIOS3 and CEREC Omnicam intra-oral scanners. Trueness, precision, and angle deviation of the test models were analyzed (α=.05). RESULTS. There was a significant difference among inter-implant distances inboth intraoral scanners (P <.001). The error of trueness and precision increased with the increasing inter-implant length, while the angle deviation did not show the same trend. A significant difference in the angle deviation was found among the inter-implant distance. The greatest angle deviation was reported in the 14-mm group of both scanners (P <.05). In contrast, the lowest angle deviation in the 21-mm group of the TR scanner and the 7-mm of the CR scanner was reported (P <.001). CONCLUSION. The inter-implant distance affected the accuracy of intra-oral scanner. The error of trueness and precision increased along with the increasing distance between two implants. However, the distortions were not clinically significant. Regarding angle deviation, the clinically significant angle deviation may be possible when using intra-oral scanners in the partially edentulous arch.
참고문헌 (43)
- Shenoy VK, "Single tooth implants : Pretreatment considerations and pretreatment evaluation", J Interdiscip Dent, 2, pp.149~157 (2012)
- Misch CE, "Dental implant prosthetics" (2015), Elsevier
- Kim Y, "Occlusal considerations in implant therapy : clinical guidelines with biomechanical rationale", Clin Oral Implants Res, 16, pp.26~35 (2005)
- Andriessen FS, "Applicability and accuracy of an intraoral scanner for scanning multiple implants in edentulous mandibles : a pilot study", J Prosthet Dent, 111, pp.186~194 (2014)
- Buzayan MM, "Passive fit in screw retained multi-unit implant prosthesis understanding and achieving : a review of the literature", J Indian Prosthodont Soc, 14, pp.16~23 (2014)
- Basaki K, "Accuracy of digital vs conventional implant impression approach:a three-dimensional comparative in vitro analysis", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 32, pp.792~799 (2017)
- Alikhasi M, "Digital implant impression technique accuracy : a systematic review", Implant Dent, 26, pp.929~935 (2017)
- Papaspyridakos P, "Vandenberghe B. Digital versus conventional implant impressions for edentulous patients: accuracy outcomes", Clin Oral Implants Res, 27, pp.465~472 (2016)
- Lee SJ, "Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: efficiency outcomes", Clin Oral Implants Res, 24, pp.111~115 (2013)
- Gallardo YR, "Patient outcomes and procedure working time for digital versus conventional impressions: a systematic review", J Prosthet Dent, 119, pp.214~219 (2018)
- Alikhasi M, "Three-dimensional accuracy of digital impression versus conventional method: effect of implant angulation and connection type", Int Dent J, pp.3761750~ (2018)
- Ajioka H, "Examination of the position accuracy of implant abutments reproduced by intra-oral optical impression", PLoS One, 11, pp.e0164048~ (2016)
- Yuzbasioglu E, "Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques:evaluation of patients’ perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes", BMC Oral Health, 14, pp.10~ (2014)
- Seelbach P, "Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow", Clin Oral Investig, 17, pp.1759~1764 (2013)
- Amin S, "Digital vs. conventional full-arch implant impressions: a comparative study", Clin Oral Implants Res, 28, pp.1360~1367 (2017)
- Cappare P, "Conventional versus digital impressions for full arch screw-retained maxillary rehabilitations: a randomized clinical trial", Int J Environ Res Public Health, 16, pp.829~ (2019)
- Abduo J, "Accuracy of intraoral scanners : a systematic review of influencing factors", Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent, 26, pp.101~121 (2018)
- Jivanescu A, "Clinical factors influence the trueness of intra-oral scanning", Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent, 27, pp.51~55 (2019)
- Keeling A, "Confounding factors affecting the marginal quality of an intra-oral scan", J Dent, 59, pp.33~40 (2017)
- Arakida T, "Evaluating the influence of ambient light on scanning trueness, precision, and time of intra oral scanner", J Prosthodont Res, 62, pp.324~329 (2018)
- Mangano FG, "Trueness and precision of 5intraoral scanners in the impressions of single and multiple implants : a comparative in vitro study", BMC Oral Health, 19, pp.101~ (2019)
- Braian M, "Trueness and precision of 5intraoral scanners for scanning edentulous and dentate complete-arch mandibular casts : a comparative in vitro study", J Prosthet Dent, 122, pp.129~136 (2019)
- Ender A, "Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions-an in-vitro study", Int J Comput Dent, 14, pp.11~21 (2011)
- Ender A, "In-vitro evaluation of the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining fullarch dental impressions", Quintessence Int, 46, pp.9~17 (2015)
- Flügge T, "The accuracy of different dental impression techniques for implant-supported dental prostheses : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Clin Oral Implants Res, 29, pp.374~392 (2018)
- Fukazawa S, "Investigation of accuracy and reproducibility of abutment position by intraoral scanners", J Prosthodont Res, 61, pp.450~459 (2017)
- Imburgia M, "Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology : a comparative in vitro study", BMC Oral Health, 17, pp.92~ (2017)
- Vandeweghe S, "Accuracy of digital impressions of multiple dental implants : an in vitro study", Clin Oral Implants Res, 28, pp.648~653 (2017)
- Eliasson A, "The accuracy of an implant impression technique using digitally coded healing abutments", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 14, pp.e30~e38 (2012)
- Howell KJ, "Comparison of the accuracy of Biomet 3i Encode Robocast Technology and conventional implant impression techniques", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 28, pp.228~240 (2013)
- Huang R, "Improved scanning accuracy with newly designed scan bodies: an in vitro study comparing digital versus conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation", Clin Oral Implants Res, 31, pp.625~633 (2020)
- Michelinakis G, "A comparison of accuracy of 3 intraoral scanners : a single-blinded in vitro study", J Prosthet Dent, 124, pp.581~588 (2020)
- Tahmaseb A, "The accuracy of static computer-aided implant surgery : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Clin Oral Implants Res, 29, pp.416~435 (2018)
- Motel C, "Impact of different scan bodies and scan strategies on the accuracy of digital implant impressions assessed with an intraoral scanner : an in vitro study", J Prosthodont, 29, pp.309~314 (2020)
- Waldecker M, "Accuracy of complete-arch intraoral scans based on confocal microscopy versus optical triangulation : a comparative in vitro study", J Prosthet Dent (2020)
- Ashraf Y, "Influence of preparation type and tooth geometry on the accuracy of different intraoral scanners", J Prosthodont, 29, pp.800~804 (2020)
- Park JM, "Comparative reproducibility analysis of 6 intraoral scanners used on complex intracoronal preparations", J Prosthet Dent, 123, pp.113~120 (2020)
- O’Toole S, "Investigation into the accuracy and measurement methods of sequential 3D dental scan alignment", Dent Mater, 35, pp.495~500 (2019)
- Ender A, "Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions : a new method of measuring trueness and precision", J Prosthet Dent, 109, pp.121~128 (2013)
- Renne W, "Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners : An in vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons", J Prosthet Dent, 118, pp.36~42 (2017)
- Richert R, "Intraoral scanner technologies : A review to make a successful impression", J Healthc Eng, 2017, pp.8427595~ (2017)
- Amornvit P, "Confocal 3D optical intraoral scanners and comparison of image capturing accuracy", Comput Mater Contin, 66, pp.303~314 (2021)
- van der Meer WJ, "Application of intra-oral dental scanners in the digital workflow of implantology", PLoS One, 7, pp.e43312~ (2012)