영어의 격에 대한 유형론적 연구 - 부치사와의 관계를 중심으로
A Typological Study on English Cases - Focused on Adpositions
2
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper aims to survey the aspects of the case and to trace how the English case system and adpositions relate each other based on the universal typology. It is observed that each language has a unique case system, but we are able to find out some meaningful generalizations on the basis of the typological approach. Languages can be classified accusative, ergative, tripartite and neutral languages as how each related to the S(subject), A(agent), and O(object). There are three different ways to designate the case; by word order, NP-marking and cross-reference. In NP-marking, either declension or adposition is used to mark the case. Since it is observed that using adpositions is the most frequent way to mark the case, we can find the significant universality: adpositions have various functions not only of marking cases but of linking words, modifying nouns and adverbs. Adpositions are originally derived from content words such as nouns, verbs and adverbs. Each adposition had its own concrete meaning, but as time goes by, it has extended to have abstract meaning.
Abstract
This paper aims to survey the aspects of the case and to trace how the English case system and adpositions relate each other based on the universal typology. It is observed that each language has a unique case system, but we are able to find out some meaningful generalizations on the basis of the typological approach. Languages can be classified accusative, ergative, tripartite and neutral languages as how each related to the S(subject), A(agent), and O(object). There are three different ways to designate the case; by word order, NP-marking and cross-reference. In NP-marking, either declension or adposition is used to mark the case. Since it is observed that using adpositions is the most frequent way to mark the case, we can find the significant universality: adpositions have various functions not only of marking cases but of linking words, modifying nouns and adverbs. Adpositions are originally derived from content words such as nouns, verbs and adverbs. Each adposition had its own concrete meaning, but as time goes by, it has extended to have abstract meaning.
참고문헌 (19)
- 김선, "유형론의 관점에서 본 영어의 격", 언어과학연구, 1(32), pp.41~62 (2005), 언어과학회
- 문장유형, "언어유형론 1: 품사", pp.송경안, 어순
- 사희만, "아랍어의 부치사", 전남대학교 인문학 연구원 언어유형론 세미나 발표문 (2004)
- 이기갑, "한국어의 부치사", 전남대학교 인문학 연구원 언어유형론 세미나 발표문 (2004)
- 이숙현, "프랑스어의 부치사", 전남대학교 인문학 연구원 언어유형론 세미나 발표문 (2004)
- 이충회, "스페인어의 부치사", 전남대학교 인문학 연구원 언어유형론 세미나 발표문 (2004)
- 조경화, "독일어의 부치사", 전남대학교 인문학 연구원 언어유형론 세미나 발표문 (2004)
- 허성태, "러시아어의 부치사", 전남대학교 인문학 연구원 언어유형론 세미나 발표문 (2004)
- Andrews, A, "Language Typology and Syntactic Description, I", pp.62~150 (1985), The Cambridge University Press
- Blake, B., "Case" (1994), Cambridge University Press
- Comrie, B., "Syntactic Typology: Studies in the Phenomenology of Language", pp.329~394 (1978), The Harvester Press
- Comrie, B., "Language Universals and Linguistic Typology" (1989), Blackwell
- Dixon, R. M. W., "Ergativity" (1994), Cambridge University Press
- Heine, B., "Adposition in African Languages", Linguistique Africaine, (2), pp.77~127 (1989)
- Heine, B., "Adpositions in african languages in a typological perspective", Paper presented in the Language Typology Workshop at Chonnam National University, pp.18~21 (2004)
- König, C., "Case in Africa", Paper presented in the Language Typology Workshop in Chonnam National University (2004)
- König, E., "Approaches to Prepositions", pp.109~125 (1991), Tübingen
- Lindstromberg S., "English Prepositions Explained" (1997), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Sweet, H., "New English Grammar: Logical and Historical" (1955), Oxford