处所意义介词“在”与韩语的对应考察－基于汉韩语平行语料库的用例研究－
A Korean Correspondence Study on Preposition “Zai” Focus on Locative Based on Chinese-Korean Parallel Corpus
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
According to the position before and after the verb, the preposition “在” can be divided into two forms: [在NP+V] and [V+在NP]. We call the former “在1” and the latter “在2”. After searching the parallel corpus of Chinese and Korean, we found that the main translation of “在1” is Korean particle “e” and then “eseo”. As for “在2”, the main translation is Korean particle “eseo”, then “e”. What’s more, when “在1” corresponds to “eseo”, the semantics of NP is “background location”, and when “在2” corresponds to “e”, the semantics of NP is “result location”. Therefore, we made the conclusion that the semantics of NP is the decisive factor leading to the translation of “在” into “e” or “eseo”.
Abstract
According to the position before and after the verb, the preposition “在” can be divided into two forms: [在NP+V] and [V+在NP]. We call the former “在1” and the latter “在2”. After searching the parallel corpus of Chinese and Korean, we found that the main translation of “在1” is Korean particle “e” and then “eseo”. As for “在2”, the main translation is Korean particle “eseo”, then “e”. What’s more, when “在1” corresponds to “eseo”, the semantics of NP is “background location”, and when “在2” corresponds to “e”, the semantics of NP is “result location”. Therefore, we made the conclusion that the semantics of NP is the decisive factor leading to the translation of “在” into “e” or “eseo”.
참고문헌 (14)
- 崔健, "韩汉范畴表达对比" (2002), 中国大百科全书出版社
- 林忠, "英汉对比语言学在我国的最新发展", 中国民航飞行学院学报, (18) (2007)
- 李金静, "“在+处所”的偏误分析及对外汉语教学", 语言文字应用, (9) (2005)
- 刘月华, "实用现代汉语语法" (2005), 韩国松山出版社出版
- 吕叔湘, "现代汉语800词" (2004), 商务印书馆出版
- 太平武, "中韩语言对比研究" (2015), 世界图书出版公司
- 俞咏梅, "论“在+处所”的语义功能和语顺制约原则", 中国语文, (1) (1999)
- Ju, Uenkyong, "韩国语学习者的助词“에”的用法学习状况研究", 硕士, pp.2004
- 김수연, "“에", 에서”的异同及其与汉语介词“在”的对比, 2018, pp.(28), 101~122[DOI]
- 왕원, "한국어 장소로서의 부사격조사 ‘-에, -에서’ 교육 연구-중국어 개사 ‘在’의 대응을 중심으로", 교육연구논총, 39(1) (2018)
- 염준, "전치사 '在'와 조사 '에서, 에'의 대응 연구 : 처소 의미를 중심으로", 석사, 국어국문학, pp.2007
- Fillmore, C. J., "Toward a modern theory of case" (1966)
- Tai, "Temporal Sequence and Chinese Word Order, Iconicity in Syntax" (1985), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Zabrocki, T., "Theoretical contrastive studies: Some methodological remarks" (1980), Cambridge University