인지언어학을 통해 본 현대중국어 개사 ‘在’와 한국어 조사 ‘에/에서’의 대조 분석
A Contrastive Study between the Chinese preposition ‘在’ and the Korean preposition ‘에/에서’ within the domain Cognitive linguistics
2
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The paper examines the original meaning and multi-meaning network of modern Chinese ‘在’, using the Cognitive Linguistics’ Intention Schema theory. It attempts to use the cognitive approach to discuss the corresponding relationship’s law of modern Chinese ‘在’ and Korean preposition ‘에/에서’. The meaning of space representation involves the prototypical meaning, and the meanings of non-spatial representation, for example, time, extension, condition, bring through prototypical meaning’s mapping. The multi-meaning of ‘在’ has a corresponding relationship with Korean preposition ‘에/에서’. When ‘在’appears ahead of a verb, it corresponds with ‘에서’,and it also expresses place of activities and dynamic existence relationship; when ‘在’ appears behind a verb, it corresponds with ‘에’, it also expresses place of arrival after action and static existence relationship. Based on the above observations, through the Intention schema of ‘在’ and ‘에/에서’, the paper shows that the space markers of modern Chinese and Korean have a common representational concepts according to human cognitive process.
Abstract
The paper examines the original meaning and multi-meaning network of modern Chinese ‘在’, using the Cognitive Linguistics’ Intention Schema theory. It attempts to use the cognitive approach to discuss the corresponding relationship’s law of modern Chinese ‘在’ and Korean preposition ‘에/에서’. The meaning of space representation involves the prototypical meaning, and the meanings of non-spatial representation, for example, time, extension, condition, bring through prototypical meaning’s mapping. The multi-meaning of ‘在’ has a corresponding relationship with Korean preposition ‘에/에서’. When ‘在’appears ahead of a verb, it corresponds with ‘에서’,and it also expresses place of activities and dynamic existence relationship; when ‘在’ appears behind a verb, it corresponds with ‘에’, it also expresses place of arrival after action and static existence relationship. Based on the above observations, through the Intention schema of ‘在’ and ‘에/에서’, the paper shows that the space markers of modern Chinese and Korean have a common representational concepts according to human cognitive process.
참고문헌 (31)
- 陈一民, "介词新探—关於介词與动词的划界及定位问题", 湘潭师範学院学报, ~ (1996)
- 崔 健, "韓漢空間標記詞的“共用”和“通用”現象", 漢語學習, ~ (2006)
- 崔希亮, "語言理解與认知" (2004), 北京語言大學出版社
- 姜海燕, "朝汉空间概念的隐喻对比", 석사, pp.2004
- 李金靜, "在＋處所”的偏誤分析及對外漢語敎學", 语言文字應用, ~ (2005)
- 柳英绿, "漢语“在＋Np”和朝鲜语“Np＋位格或與格”的对比", 语文研究, ~ (1985)
- 呂叔湘 主編, "现代汉语八百词(增订版)" (1999), 商务印书馆
- 齐沪扬, "現代漢語空間問題硏究" (1998), 學林出版社
- 申敬善, "現代漢語“在”字句硏究", 박사, pp.2006
- 王葆華, "介词“在”多义性的认知解释", 中國言語硏究, ~ (2008)
- 국립국어원, "외국인을 위한 한국어 문법1" (2007), 커뮤니케이션북스
- 김현희, "현대중국어 ‘在’에 대한 인지적 고찰", 석사, pp.2005
- 남기심, "국어 조사의 용법-‘에’와 ‘로’를 중심으로" (1996), 도서출판박이정
- 박종한, "인지문법에 의한 현대 중국어의 다의어 연구", 중국언어연구, 5 (1997)
- 박창수, "한국어 조사 ‘에서, 에’와 상응하는 중국어 표현법 연구", 석사, pp.2005
- 서정수, "국어문법" (1994), 뿌리 깊은 나무
- 안령군, "한국어 조사 ‘에’의 의미와 용법 연구", 석사, pp.2005
- 염 준, "전치사 ‘在’와 ‘에서, 에’의 대응 연구-처소 의미를 중심으로", 석사, pp.2007
- 유재원, "존재 표현에 나타난 한국인 중국어 학습자의 중간언어 연구 - 오류 유형 분석 및 목록화를 중심으로-", 중국연구, 43, pp.159~188 (2008), 중국연구소
- 王 鵬, "한국어 조사와 중국어 개사의 대응관계 연구", 석사, 국어국문, pp.2008
- 이기동, "조사 ‘에’와 ‘에서’의 기본 의미", 한글, (173) (1981)
- 이희자, "사전식 텍스트분석적 국어 조사의 연구,말뭉치 기반 국어 연구 총서 1" (1998), 연세대학교 언어정보 연구원, 한국문화사
- 임지룡, "인지의미론" (1997), 탑출판사
- 존 R. 테일러, "인지언어학이란 무엇인가" (1999), 한국문화사
- 최재희, "한국어 문법론" (2004), 태학사
- E. Traugott, "Approaches to Grammaticalization Vol. 1" (1991), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- G. Lakoff, "인지의미론" (1987), 한국문화사
- George Lakoff, "Metaphors we live by. (2nd edition)" (2003), The University of Chicago press
- M. Johson, "마음속의 몸" (2000), 철학과현실사
- R. W. Langacker, "인지문법" (1991), 한신문화사
- Zlatev, Jordan, "SpatialSemantics in The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistic" (2007), Oxford University Press