본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Epistemic Necessity Modality and Presupposition

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

Necessity modality is semantically characterized by the fact that it is involved in universal quantification. This paper points out some problems that might arise from this: weak necessity modals do not respect the semantics of necessity modals. This is because according to the traditional treatment of the modal, the set of worlds in which the strong necessity modal is assessed is predicted to include the set of worlds in which the weak modal is assessed. To remedy this, this paper argues that strong and weak necessity modals have their own set of worlds which are determined by the respective presupposition triggered by them, and universally quantify over each of their own possible worlds.

Abstract

Necessity modality is semantically characterized by the fact that it is involved in universal quantification. This paper points out some problems that might arise from this: weak necessity modals do not respect the semantics of necessity modals. This is because according to the traditional treatment of the modal, the set of worlds in which the strong necessity modal is assessed is predicted to include the set of worlds in which the weak modal is assessed. To remedy this, this paper argues that strong and weak necessity modals have their own set of worlds which are determined by the respective presupposition triggered by them, and universally quantify over each of their own possible worlds.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. Butler, J, "A Minimalist Treatment of Modality", Lingua, 113, pp.967~996 (2003)
  2. Celce-Murcia, M., "The Grammar Book" (1999), Heinle & Heinle Publishers
  3. Copley, B, "What Should Should Mean", 석사, pp.2006
  4. Durbig, H, "On Syntactic Form of Epistemic Modality", 석사, pp.2001
  5. Faller, M, "Evidentiality and Epistemic Modality at the Semantics", Pragmatics Interface, The University of Manchester, 2006
  6. von Fintel, "How to Say Ought in Foreign: The Composition of Weak Necessity Modals", 석사, pp.2006
  7. von Fintel, "An Opinionated Guide to Epistemic Modality", 석사, pp.2007
  8. Horn, L, "A Natrual History of Negation" (1989), University of Chicago Press
  9. Karttunen, L, "Possible and Must, in Syntax and Semantics 1", pp.181~193 (1972), Academic Press
  10. Kratzer, A, "What ‘Must’ and ‘Can’ Must and Can Mean", Linguistics and Philosophy, 1, pp.337~355 (1977)
  11. Kratzer, A, "Conditional Necessity and Possibility, in Semantics From Different Points of View", pp.117~147 (1979), Springer-Verlag
  12. Kratzer, A., "The Notional Category of Modality, in Words, Worlds, and Contexts", pp.38~74 (1981), Water de Gruyter
  13. Kratzer, A, "Modality, in Seamntics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research", pp.639~650 (1991), Walter de Gruyter
  14. Matthew, R, "Modal Auxiliary Constructions, TAM and Interrogatives, in Modality in Contemporary English", pp.47~70 (2003), Mouton de Gruyter
  15. Portner, P, "Modality" (2009), Oxford University Press
  16. Prince, Ellen, "On the Syntactic Marking of Presupposed Open Propositions", Papers from the Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Theory, 22nd Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, pp.208~222 (1986)
  17. Sloman, A, "Ought and Better", Mind 79, 315, pp.385~394 (1970)
  18. 송민영, "The Semantics of Epistemic would", 영어학, 8(2), pp.265~294 (2008), 한국영어학회
  19. 송민영, "An Epistemic Modal Approach to the Semantics of the Korean Temporal Marker ‐ess", 현대문법연구, (56), pp.57~102 (2009), 현대문법학회
  20. 송민영, "The Semantics of Epistemic Modality", 영어학연구, (28), pp.301~342 (2009), 한국영어학학회
  21. 송민영, "Remarks on Strong Necessity Epistemic Modals", 현대문법연구, (60), pp.157~193 (2010), 현대문법학회
  22. Stalnaker, R, "Pragmatic Presuppositions, in Semantics and Philosophy", pp.197~213 (1974), New York University Press
  23. Stalnaker, R, "Inquiry" (1987), MIT Press
  24. Stalnaker, R, "Common Ground", Linguistics and Philosophy, 25, pp.701~721 (2002)
  25. Strang, B, "Modern English Structure" (1968), Edward Arnold
  26. Ward, G., "A Pragmatic Analysis of the Epistemic Would Construction in English, in Modality in Contemporary English" (2003), Mouton de Gruyter
  27. Ward, G., "Epistemic Would, Open Propositions, and Truncated Clefts, in Topics on the Grammar-Pragmatics Interface", pp.77~90 (2007), John Benjamins
  28. Westmoreland, R, "Information and Intonation in Natural Language Modality", 박사, pp.1998

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)