본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Meaning classes of evidential implications across languages

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This paper discusses the meaning type of the evidential implications triggered by evidentials across languages. I argue that they do not fit into classical meaning categories such as presupposition (in the sense of Stalnaker 1974), conventional implicature (in the sense of Potts 2005), and conversational implicature (in the sense of Grice 1975). I explore cross-linguistically common and varied properties of the evidential implications, and propose their taxonomy, following Tonhauser et al.’s (2013) approach to projective content. On the basis of the proposed taxonomy, I examine various properties of the evidential implication arising from Korean evidential sentences with -te, and discuss which meaning class it belongs to in the proposed taxonomy.

Abstract

This paper discusses the meaning type of the evidential implications triggered by evidentials across languages. I argue that they do not fit into classical meaning categories such as presupposition (in the sense of Stalnaker 1974), conventional implicature (in the sense of Potts 2005), and conversational implicature (in the sense of Grice 1975). I explore cross-linguistically common and varied properties of the evidential implications, and propose their taxonomy, following Tonhauser et al.’s (2013) approach to projective content. On the basis of the proposed taxonomy, I examine various properties of the evidential implication arising from Korean evidential sentences with -te, and discuss which meaning class it belongs to in the proposed taxonomy.

참고문헌 (31)

  1. Abbott, Barbara, "Presuppositions as nonassertions", Journal of Pragmatics, 32, pp.1419~1437 (2000)
  2. AnderBois, Scott, "At-issue proposals and appositive impositions in discourse", Journal of Semantics, 32(1), pp.93~138 (2015)
  3. Chierchia, Gennaro, "Meaning and grammar" (1990), The MIT Press
  4. Cinque, Guglielmo, "Adverbs and Functional Heads" (1999), Oxford University Press
  5. Davis, Christopher, "Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 17", pp.71~88 (2007), CLC Publications
  6. Faller, Martina, "Semantics and Pragmatics of Evidentials in Cuzco Quechua", PhD, pp.2002
  7. Faller, Martina, "Evidentiality and epistemic modality at the semantics", pragmatics interface, 2006, ~[DOI]
  8. Ginzburg, Jonathan, "Questions, queries, and facts: A semantics and pragmatics for interrogatives", PhD, pp.1992
  9. Grice, Paul, "The Logic of Grammar", pp.64~75 (1975), Dickenson
  10. Groenendijk, Jeroen, "Inquisitive semantics and pragmatics", presented at the Stanford workshop on Language (2009), Communication and Relational Agency
  11. Gunlogson, Christine, "True to form: Rising and falling declaratives as questions in English", PhD, pp.2001
  12. Izvorski, Roumyana, "Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 7", pp.222~239 (1997), CLC Publications
  13. Karttunen, Lauri, "Presuppositions of compound sentences", Linguistic Inquiry, 4, pp.169~193 (1973)
  14. Karttunen, Lauri, "Presuppositions and linguistic context", Theoretical Linguistics, 1, pp.182~194 (1974)
  15. Lambrecht, Knud, "Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents" (1994), Cambridge University Press
  16. Lee, Jungmee, "Bidirectionality in the interaction between at-issue and not-at-issue content" (2016), Sungkyunkwan University
  17. Matthewson, Lisa, "The Linguistic Variation Yearbook 7", pp.201~254 (2007), John Benjamins
  18. McCready, Eric, "Evidentiality, modality and probability", Linguistics and Philosophy, 30, pp.147~206 (2007)
  19. Murray, E. Sarah, "Evidentiality and the structure of speech acts", PhD, pp.2010
  20. Potts, Christopher, "The syntax and semantics of As-parentheticals", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 20(3), pp.623~689 (2002)
  21. Potts, Christopher, "The Logic of Conventional Implicatures" (2005), Oxford University Press
  22. Potts, Christopher, "The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces", pp.475~501 (2007), Oxford University Press
  23. Roberts, Craige, "Information structure in discourse: Toward an integrated formal theory of pragmatics", OSU Working Papers in Linguistics, 49 (1996), The Ohio State University Department of Linguistics
  24. Roberts, Craige, "Presupposition, conventional implicature, and beyond: A unified account of projection", presented at the 2009 ESSLLI workshop “New Directions in the Theory of Presupposition” (2009)
  25. Sauerland, Uli, "Embedded evidentials in Bulgarian", Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung, 11, pp.525~539 (2007), Universitat Pompeu Fabra
  26. Simons, Mandy, "Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 20", pp.309~327 (2010), Cornell University
  27. Speas, Margaret, "Evidentiality, logophoricity, and the syntactic representation of prag matic features", Lingua, 114, pp.255~276 (2004)
  28. Speas, Tenny, "Asymmetry in Grammar", pp.315~344 (2003), John Benjamins
  29. Stalnaker, Robert, "Semantics and Philosophy", pp.197~213 (1974), New York University Press
  30. Stalnaker, Robert, "Syntax and Semantics 9", pp.315~322 (1987), Pragmatics
  31. Tonhauser, Judith, "Toward a taxonomy of projective content", Language, 89, pp.66~109 (2013)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)