고려·조선 和蘇詩의 창작 양상과 사회문화적 의의
The Aspects of Responding Poems to Su Shi’s(和蘇詩) during the Goryeo Dynasty and the Joseon Dynasty and Its Sociocultural Significance
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Through comparing responding poems to Su Shi’s(和蘇詩) during the Goryeo dynasty and the Joseon dynasty with the original poems of Su Shi(蘇軾), I analyzed the psychological mechanism that created the responding poems to Su Shi’s and the aspects of these poems in depth. Through this, I surveyed a phase of Su Shi’s influences on the literary society of the Goryeo Dynasty and the Joseon Dynasty. As a result, I found that responding poems to Su Shi’s during these periods can be divided into three types. The first type was written for emotional communication with Su Shi. The second type was written to train their own poetry writing. The third type was written as a means of communication with literary friends. The first type and the second type are individual creative acts, but the third type is impossible without social consensus among literary friends. So we can say that responding poems to Su Shi’s in the Goryeo dynasty and the Joseon dynasty did not stop at individual creative acts, but over a long period of time, they gradually developed into a cultural code based on social consensus, and finally, they formed a literary culture which can be called ‘culture of responding poems to Su Shi’s’.
Abstract
Through comparing responding poems to Su Shi’s(和蘇詩) during the Goryeo dynasty and the Joseon dynasty with the original poems of Su Shi(蘇軾), I analyzed the psychological mechanism that created the responding poems to Su Shi’s and the aspects of these poems in depth. Through this, I surveyed a phase of Su Shi’s influences on the literary society of the Goryeo Dynasty and the Joseon Dynasty. As a result, I found that responding poems to Su Shi’s during these periods can be divided into three types. The first type was written for emotional communication with Su Shi. The second type was written to train their own poetry writing. The third type was written as a means of communication with literary friends. The first type and the second type are individual creative acts, but the third type is impossible without social consensus among literary friends. So we can say that responding poems to Su Shi’s in the Goryeo dynasty and the Joseon dynasty did not stop at individual creative acts, but over a long period of time, they gradually developed into a cultural code based on social consensus, and finally, they formed a literary culture which can be called ‘culture of responding poems to Su Shi’s’.
참고문헌 (39)
- 南孝溫, "秋江集", 韓國文集叢刊本, ~
- 徐居正, "四佳詩集", 韓國文集叢刊本, ~
- 成俔, "虛白堂詩集", 韓國文集叢刊本, ~
- 申欽, "象村稿", 韓國文集叢刊本, ~
- 李滉, "退溪先生文集", 韓國文集叢刊本, ~
- 李滉, "退溪先生文集別集", 韓國文集叢刊本, ~
- 鄭士龍, "湖陰雜稿", 韓國文集叢刊本, ~
- 丁若鏞, "與猶堂全書", 韓國文集叢刊本, ~
- 曺偉, "梅溪先生文集", 韓國文集叢刊本, ~
- 蔡壽, "懶齋集", 韓國文集叢刊本, ~
- 崔岦, "簡易集", 韓國文集叢刊本, ~
- 李燾, "續資治通鑑長編", 四庫全書本, ~
- 陸游, "渭南文集", 四庫全書本, ~
- 歐陽修, "文忠集", 四庫全書本, ~
- 王維, "王右丞集箋注", 四庫全書本, ~
- 朱熹, "二程外書", 四庫全書本, ~
- 강필임, "시회의 탄생" (2016), 한길사
- 蘇軾, "정본완역 소동파시집2-3" (2016), 서울대학교출판문화원
- 蘇軾, "蘇軾詩集" (1987), 中華書局
- 蘇轍, "欒城集" (1987), 上海古籍出版社
- 王定保, "唐摭言" (1978), 上海古籍出版社
- J.Huizinga, "Homo Ludens: A Study Of The Play-element In Culture" (1964), The Beacon Press
- 강지희, "退溪의 「和陶集飮酒二十首」에 나타난陶淵明 수용 양상", 동방한문학, (44), pp.31~62 (2010), 동방한문학회[DOI]
- 김경동, "소식 시에 대한 이규보의 追和詩", 중국어문학지, (19), pp.111~138 (2005), 중국어문학회
- 김남이, "佔畢齋 金宗直의 「和陶淵明述酒」가 읊은 역사와 현실의 문제 1475년(성종 6) 겨울, 왜 陶淵明의 「述酒」인가?", 코기토, 81, pp.421~473 (2017), 인문학연구소
- 김보경, "韓國 ‘和陶詩’ 硏究 序說", 중국문학, 66, pp.219~243 (2011), 한국중국어문학회[DOI]
- 김상홍, "茶山의「和蘇長公東坡八首」攷", 동아시아고대학, 19, pp.181~213 (2009), 동아시아고대학회
- 손팔주, "동방문학비교연구총서 제3권" (1997)
- 오보라, "紅泉社의 결성과 시세계‒ 聯句詩를 중심으로", 동양고전연구, (66), pp.35~73 (2017), 동양고전학회[DOI]
- 유영봉, "艮齋의 「和陶詩」에 관한 연구", 간재학논총, 16, pp.25~46 (2013), 간재학회
- 이관성, "陶厓 洪錫謨의 和陶詩 연구", 동양고전연구, (74), pp.281~307 (2019), 동양고전학회
- 이미진, "聯句詩의 창작 방식과 배경 고찰 - 謙齋 趙泰億의 사례를 중심으로 -", 동양고전연구, (74), pp.247~280 (2019), 동양고전학회
- 이영숙, "晦峯 河謙鎭의 「和陶詩」와 東坡 蘇軾의 「和陶詩」 比較硏究", 南冥學硏究, (39), pp.109~146 (2013), 경남문화연구원[DOI]
- 이창룡, "退溪의 東坡受容樣相", 국어교육, 44 (1983)
- 임준철, "조선 전기 和陶詩의 轉變", 한국한문학연구, (60), pp.7~49 (2015), 한국한문학회[DOI]
- 정숙인, "象村 申欽의 <和陶詩> 중 <飮酒> 20首 연구 - 陶淵明의 <飮酒>, 蘇軾의 <和陶飮酒詩>와의 비교문학적 관점에서 -", 우리문학연구, (35), pp.91~119 (2012), 우리문학회
- 황민선, "<和蘇長公東坡>에 드러난 다산의 유인(幽人)공간 고찰", 한국시가문화연구, (42), pp.157~184 (2018), 한국시가문화학회
- 袁行霈, "論和陶詩及文化意蘊", 中國社會科學, (6) (2003)
- "한국고전종합DB"[URL]