한국어 '같다' 구문과 중국어 '好像' 구문의 대조 연구: 인식 양태 중심으로
The Comparative Study of Korean 'kathta' construction and Chinese 'haoxiang' construction: Focusing on the Epistemic Modality
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims to contrast and analyze the syntactic and semantic characteristics of the 'kathta' construction, focusing on epistemic modality, and the 'haoxiang' construction in Chinese. Specifically, the lexical meanings of 'kathta' and 'haoxiang' undergo a process of meaning abstraction and become grammaticalized as expressions of epistemic modality, conveying a sense of speculation. However, in terms of syntactic characteristics, 'kathta' can be divided into cases where it takes an external argument and cases where it does not. In the former case, it retains its descriptive nature as a psychological adjective and is related to the subject’s speculation, while in the latter, it is grammaticalized as an epistemic modal, reflecting the speaker's speculation. On the other hand, 'haoxiang' is fully grammaticalized as an epistemic modal, expressing only the speaker's speculation. Therefore, this study distinguishes between the speaker's speculation and the subject's speculation, interpreting the syntactic differences between the two constructions through their respective syntactic structures.
Abstract
This study aims to contrast and analyze the syntactic and semantic characteristics of the 'kathta' construction, focusing on epistemic modality, and the 'haoxiang' construction in Chinese. Specifically, the lexical meanings of 'kathta' and 'haoxiang' undergo a process of meaning abstraction and become grammaticalized as expressions of epistemic modality, conveying a sense of speculation. However, in terms of syntactic characteristics, 'kathta' can be divided into cases where it takes an external argument and cases where it does not. In the former case, it retains its descriptive nature as a psychological adjective and is related to the subject’s speculation, while in the latter, it is grammaticalized as an epistemic modal, reflecting the speaker's speculation. On the other hand, 'haoxiang' is fully grammaticalized as an epistemic modal, expressing only the speaker's speculation. Therefore, this study distinguishes between the speaker's speculation and the subject's speculation, interpreting the syntactic differences between the two constructions through their respective syntactic structures.