화제화 및 초점화와 분리보문소구
Topicalization, Focalization and Split CP
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The aim of this paper is to reanalyze the structure with preposed and inverted constituent(PCS & ICS) of topicalization and focalization and to suggest that PCS and ICS have the same derivation in the narrow syntax(Chomsky1998,1999) as the canonical construction and then have a further derivation to prepose the preposed and inverted phrase to the left periphery. I argue the negative and interrogative sentences that can set up inversion, laying stress on the theory of Haegeman. She analyzed such negative and interrogative sentences as topicalization and focalization, and interrogatives accompanied by topicalization and also inversion and the grammatacalicity of sentences that negative constituent and topicalization appear together. She showed the branching diagram as the tree diagram of main text with topic over focus on the right line. In the case of focus the finite verb, the head word moves into the position of C and therefore inversion takes place. In ICS the inversed constituents were assumed subjects. This paper argues that the postverbal DP is a subject and that the preverbal elements are placed at the Spec of CP. To analyze the structure of IC, this paper adopts the Split CP, which comprises CP, TopP, and FocP. Since in terms of the checking/agreement theory of movement, no freee optional preposing can be allowed, this paper suggests that the preverbal elements of IC has [Foc] feature and that to check the feature, the focused element, that is, the inversion phrase should move to the Spec of CP or FocP.
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to reanalyze the structure with preposed and inverted constituent(PCS & ICS) of topicalization and focalization and to suggest that PCS and ICS have the same derivation in the narrow syntax(Chomsky1998,1999) as the canonical construction and then have a further derivation to prepose the preposed and inverted phrase to the left periphery. I argue the negative and interrogative sentences that can set up inversion, laying stress on the theory of Haegeman. She analyzed such negative and interrogative sentences as topicalization and focalization, and interrogatives accompanied by topicalization and also inversion and the grammatacalicity of sentences that negative constituent and topicalization appear together. She showed the branching diagram as the tree diagram of main text with topic over focus on the right line. In the case of focus the finite verb, the head word moves into the position of C and therefore inversion takes place. In ICS the inversed constituents were assumed subjects. This paper argues that the postverbal DP is a subject and that the preverbal elements are placed at the Spec of CP. To analyze the structure of IC, this paper adopts the Split CP, which comprises CP, TopP, and FocP. Since in terms of the checking/agreement theory of movement, no freee optional preposing can be allowed, this paper suggests that the preverbal elements of IC has [Foc] feature and that to check the feature, the focused element, that is, the inversion phrase should move to the Spec of CP or FocP.
참고문헌 (32)
- Authier, J. M., "Iterated CPs and Embedded Topicalization", Linguistic Inquiry, 23, pp.329~336 (1992)
- Bresnan, J., "Locative Inversion and the Architecture of Universal Grammar", Language, 70, pp.72~131 (1994)
- Browning, M. A., "CP Recursion and That-t Effects", Linguistic Inquiry, 27, pp.237~255 (1996)
- Cheng, L. L., "On the Typology of WH-Questions", 박사, pp.1991
- Chomsky, N., "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
- Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework, "Chomsky, N.", MIT, ~ (1998)
- Derivation by Phase, "Chomsky, N.", MIT, ~
- Collins, C., "Local Economy" (1997), MIT Press
- Coopmans, P., "Where Stylistic and Syntactic Processes Meet: Locative Inversion in English", Language, pp.728~751 (1989)
- Culicover, P. W., "Topicalization, Inversion, and Complentizers in English", Fifth Symposium on Comparative Grammar, OST Working Papers: Going Romance and Beyond, pp.1~43 (1991), University of Utrecht
- individual level distinction. in: Discourse kinematics, topic-focus structure, and logics, "The dynamics of Focus-Structure, F-Structure, theoretical discourse theory and the stage", pp.1997, Erteschik-Shir N.
- Frascarelli, M., "The Syntax-Phonology Intrerface Focus and Topic constructions in Italy" (2000), Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Haegeman, L., "Elements of Grammar: handbook of generative Syntax" (2000), Kluwer
- Haegeman, Liliane, "Argument Fronting in English, Romance CLLD and the Left Periphrey. In Negation, Tense and Clausal Archtecture: Cross-Linguistic Investigations" (2005), Georgetown University Press
- Haegeman, Liliane, "Negative Heads and the NEG Criterion", Linguistic Review, 8, pp.233~251 (1991)
- Hagičová, Eva, "Topic and Focus of a Sentence and the Patterning of a Text. in: Text and Discourse Constitution", pp.70~96 (1988), De Gruyter
- Hagičová, Eva, "Topic-Focus Articulation, Tripartite Structures, and Semantic Content" (1998), Kluwer
- Halliday M. A. K., "Notes on transivity and theme in English", Journal of Linguistics, 3, pp.37~81 (1967)
- Hatakeyama, Y., "An Analysis of Inverse Copular Sentence and the Theoretical Consequence for Clause Structure: A Feature Compositional Approach to the Split-CP Hypothesis", Linguistic Analysis, 27, pp.26~65 (1997)
- Hoekstra, T., "Unergatives as Copular Verbs: Locational and Existential Predication", The Linguistic Review, 7, pp.1~79 (1990)
- Hooper, J. B., "On the Applicability of Root Transformations", Linguistic Inquiry, 4, pp.463~497 (1973)
- Koizmi, M., "Phrase Structure in Minimalist Syntax", 박사, pp.1994
- Koktova E., "On the scoping properties of negation, focusing particles and sentence adverbials", Theoretical Linguistics, 14, pp.173~226 (1988)
- Lasnik, H., "On the Nature of Proper Government", Linguistic Inquiry, 15, pp.235~289 (1984)
- Levine, R. D., "On the Focus Inversion: Syntactic Valence and the Role of a SUBCAT List", Linguistics, 27, pp.1013~1055 (1989)
- Quirk, Randolf, "A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language" (1985), Longman
- Radford, Andrew, "Syntactic Theory and the Structure of English: A Minimalist Approach" (1997), Cambridge University Press
- Radford, Andrew, "Counter-Filtering Rules", York Papers in Linguistics, 7, pp.7~45 (2003)
- Radford, Andrew, "English Syntax: An Introduction" (2004), Cambridge University Press
- Rizzi, L., "The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery. in: Elements of Grammar: handbook of generative Syntax", pp.281~337 (1997), Kluwer
- Rochemont, M. S., "English Liguistic Society of Japan 14", 101~128 (1990)
- Loss of Wh-Movement in Old Japanese and Demise of "Kararimusubi, "Watanabe, A.", University of Maryland at College Park, ~, pp.Paper presented at DIGS Ⅵ (2000)