시의 정치화와 시적인 것의 정치성 임화의 「네 거리의 순이」와 이상의 「가외가전(街外街傳)」에 나타난 시적 주체(화자) 유형에 대한 해석을 중심으로
The Politicalization of the poem and the political of the poetic
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This thesis compare Yi Sang's poetry with Yim Wha's poetry from the political viewpoint in literature. Until now Yim's poetry was regarded as a radical political poetry, so called the realism, while Yi's poetry was regarded as an extreme non-political poetry. Yim's poetry show us a actuality by means of a dramatic narrative, so called the short epic. The subject(speaker) in Yim's poetry very well knows his own political and historical ‘real'. Therefore we are able to call the subject of certainty or omniscient subject.. But contrary to preconception, 「Soon Yi on the crossing street」, his representative poetry, is not radical poetically. Because of eradication of uncertainty and coincidence. Whereas Yi's poetry show us un obscure real by means of a poetic irony. The subject in Yi's poetry always fall into confusion, what is my own real? What is the called as the unknowing subject or ‘hysterical subject’ from the perspective psychoanalysis. According to the perspective S.Žižek, who appropriates Lacan's insight on social and ideological levels, hysterical subject is related to the real concealed by symbolic order or to the lack and contradiction of the world. Based on such problematics, Žižek understands the moment at which hysterical subject poses question(Che vuoi?) as symptom of the exposure of the fissures in the symbolic order and interprets this as a moment at which ideological fantasy is ruptured. The speaker(poetic subject) in 「Kawoekazeon(街外街傳)」, Yi's poety, is hysterical subject. He poses hysterical question by means of the seeing the lack in his own real. According to this interpretation, Yi's poetry is able to be regarded more radical than Yim's poetry poetically. Then Yi's poetic radicality is radical not only aesthetic but also political.
Abstract
This thesis compare Yi Sang's poetry with Yim Wha's poetry from the political viewpoint in literature. Until now Yim's poetry was regarded as a radical political poetry, so called the realism, while Yi's poetry was regarded as an extreme non-political poetry. Yim's poetry show us a actuality by means of a dramatic narrative, so called the short epic. The subject(speaker) in Yim's poetry very well knows his own political and historical ‘real'. Therefore we are able to call the subject of certainty or omniscient subject.. But contrary to preconception, 「Soon Yi on the crossing street」, his representative poetry, is not radical poetically. Because of eradication of uncertainty and coincidence. Whereas Yi's poetry show us un obscure real by means of a poetic irony. The subject in Yi's poetry always fall into confusion, what is my own real? What is the called as the unknowing subject or ‘hysterical subject’ from the perspective psychoanalysis. According to the perspective S.Žižek, who appropriates Lacan's insight on social and ideological levels, hysterical subject is related to the real concealed by symbolic order or to the lack and contradiction of the world. Based on such problematics, Žižek understands the moment at which hysterical subject poses question(Che vuoi?) as symptom of the exposure of the fissures in the symbolic order and interprets this as a moment at which ideological fantasy is ruptured. The speaker(poetic subject) in 「Kawoekazeon(街外街傳)」, Yi's poety, is hysterical subject. He poses hysterical question by means of the seeing the lack in his own real. According to this interpretation, Yi's poetry is able to be regarded more radical than Yim's poetry poetically. Then Yi's poetic radicality is radical not only aesthetic but also political.
참고문헌 (25)
- 임화, "임화 전집 1" (2000), 박이정
- 이상, "이상 전집 1·2·4" (2009), 뿔
- 이상, "이상문학전집 1·2·3" (2005), 소명출판
- 이상, "이상문학전집 1" (1999), 문학사상사
- 김기진, "단편서사시의 길로-우리 시의 양식 문제에 대하야", 중외일보, ~ (1929), 1929.5
- 김동환, "임화의 옵바와 화로" (1933), 삼천리
- 김윤식, "임화연구 in 한국근대문예비평사연구" (1984), 일지사
- 김백영, "지배와공간-식민지 도시 경성과 일본 제국" (2000), 문학과지성사
- 김정훈, "임화 시 연구" (2001), 국학자료원
- 송영, "수원행-프로연맹 구연기" (1929), 조선지광
- 유성호, "‘청년’과 ‘적’의 대위법-1930년대 중반의 임화의 시 in 임화 문학연구" (2009), 소명출판
- 유종호, "사회주의 시인의 탄생 in 다시 읽는 한국시" (2002), 문학동네
- 이경훈, "가외가전 주석 in 이상, 철천의 수사학" (2000), 소명출판
- 임화, "시인이여! 일보전진하자", 조선지광, ~ (1930), 1930.6.
- 임화, "당래할 조선문학을 위한 신제창;위대한 로만적 정신", 동아일보, 1~4 (1936)
- 임화, "잡록", 청색지, (5) (1939)
- 정재찬, "단편서사시와 서정 정신 in 현대시의 이념과 논리" (2007), 역락
- 최현식, "낭만성,신념과 성찰의 이중주 in 임화 문학의 재인식" (2004), 소명출판
- 함돈균, "이상 시의 아이러니와 히스테리적 주체의 윤리학", 박사, pp.2010
- E.Behler, "아이러니와 모더니티 담론" (2005), 동문선
- H.Lefebvre, "모더니티 입문" (1999), 동문선
- M.Berman, "현대성의 경험" (2004), 현대미학사
- S.Žižek, "이데올로기라는 숭고한 대상" (2002), 인간사랑
- 김인, "상상력과 원근법" (1933), 문학과지성사
- 김인환, "이상 시의 계보 in 기억의 계단" (2001), 민음사
