본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

이상 시의 환각 이미지 연구 -「詩第十一號」·「詩第十三號」·「沈歿」에 대한 주석

The Study on the poetic image of the hallucination in the poems of LeeSang

1

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류문학

초록

This article is a trial for understanding the poetic image of the hallucination in a some poems of LeeSang. In spite of a lot of studying on the poems of LeeSang, the poetic image of the hallucination in the poems of him has not yet been properly investigated. The hallucination in the psychoanalysis is different from the phantasy. The phantasy covers up the lack of the subject and the Other. That is the screen which protects the crack of ‘the Symbol’. The subject learns the desire and is made up the whole in the phantasy. It is connected with the imagination. But the hallucination does not know the dialectic of the subject-the other and taboo in‘ the Symbol’. It belongs to ‘the Real’. The subject do not regulates that. The poetic image of the hallucination in the poems of LeeSang is represented by a self-regulation and cut(cutting) body against the subject as the whole of the consciousness. This image is the poetic symptom which show us the subject as the One that can not be composed. And it show us how to do totality with failures. In the poems of LeeSang, the poetic subject always fails in the One. It is closely related with the subject in the psychoanalysis. With Lacan, it is not enough to say the subject’s identity is all the way constitutively truncated, dispersed because of the intrusion of an irreducible outside. The point is rather that the subject is nothing but the name for this multilation, for this impossibility of the substance to realise itself fully, to achieve its full identity with itself. And in Lacanian theory,this irreducible outside, this foreign body, this intruder that prevents the full constitution of the subject and to which subject is strictly correlative, has precise name. In its very ontological (non)status, the subject is the negative of the strange body which prevents substance from achieving identity with itself. In addition to, the subject of the poems of him face up to his split body. In spite of his extream fear, he gazes his trauma. With Lacan or Zizek, this gaze means that the subject identifies himself not with phantasy but with symptom. They say that it is“ crossing the phantasy”. These poetic images are related to a specific character of the poetic irony in the poems of LeeSang. The irony in the modern poetry is a mark of the split of the World;namely “the ontological lack”. Finally, we can relate the spilt of the subject in his poems with that. This study minutely analyzes his some poems with this new angle.

Abstract

This article is a trial for understanding the poetic image of the hallucination in a some poems of LeeSang. In spite of a lot of studying on the poems of LeeSang, the poetic image of the hallucination in the poems of him has not yet been properly investigated. The hallucination in the psychoanalysis is different from the phantasy. The phantasy covers up the lack of the subject and the Other. That is the screen which protects the crack of ‘the Symbol’. The subject learns the desire and is made up the whole in the phantasy. It is connected with the imagination. But the hallucination does not know the dialectic of the subject-the other and taboo in‘ the Symbol’. It belongs to ‘the Real’. The subject do not regulates that. The poetic image of the hallucination in the poems of LeeSang is represented by a self-regulation and cut(cutting) body against the subject as the whole of the consciousness. This image is the poetic symptom which show us the subject as the One that can not be composed. And it show us how to do totality with failures. In the poems of LeeSang, the poetic subject always fails in the One. It is closely related with the subject in the psychoanalysis. With Lacan, it is not enough to say the subject’s identity is all the way constitutively truncated, dispersed because of the intrusion of an irreducible outside. The point is rather that the subject is nothing but the name for this multilation, for this impossibility of the substance to realise itself fully, to achieve its full identity with itself. And in Lacanian theory,this irreducible outside, this foreign body, this intruder that prevents the full constitution of the subject and to which subject is strictly correlative, has precise name. In its very ontological (non)status, the subject is the negative of the strange body which prevents substance from achieving identity with itself. In addition to, the subject of the poems of him face up to his split body. In spite of his extream fear, he gazes his trauma. With Lacan or Zizek, this gaze means that the subject identifies himself not with phantasy but with symptom. They say that it is“ crossing the phantasy”. These poetic images are related to a specific character of the poetic irony in the poems of LeeSang. The irony in the modern poetry is a mark of the split of the World;namely “the ontological lack”. Finally, we can relate the spilt of the subject in his poems with that. This study minutely analyzes his some poems with this new angle.

참고문헌 (32)

  1. "가톨릭 청년 1935. 4", ~ (1935)
  2. "朝鮮中央日報1934. 8. 4", ~ (1934)
  3. "朝鮮日報 1936. 10. 4" (1936)
  4. 임종국, "이상문학 전집" (1966), 문성사
  5. 이어령, "굃箱文學全集" (1977), 갑인출판사
  6. 이승훈, "이상문학전집 1" (1999), 문학사상사
  7. 김주현, "정본 이상문학전집 1" (2005), 소명출판
  8. 권영민, "이상 전집 1" (2009), 뿔
  9. 오규원, "거울 속의 나는 외출 중-한글판 이상 시 전집" (1981), 문장
  10. 권영민, "이상전집 1" (2009), 뿔
  11. 김승구, "이상, 욕망의기호" (2004), 월인
  12. 김주현, "정본이상문학전집 1" (2005), 소명출판
  13. 김종훈, "이상시에나타난‘나’의유형연구", 석사, pp.2001
  14. 신형철, "이상 시에 나타난 시선의 정치학과 거울의 주체론. in: 이상 문학 연구의 새로운 지평" (2006), 신구문화사
  15. 이승훈, "이상문학전집 1" (1999), 문학사상사
  16. 이어령, "굃箱文學全集" (1977), 갑인출판사
  17. 조해옥, "이상시의 근대성연구" (2001), 소명출판
  18. Lemaire, A., "자크라캉" (1998), 문예출판사
  19. Lefebvre, H., "모더니티 입문" (1999), 동문선
  20. Laplanche, J., "정신분석사전" (2005), 열린책들
  21. Fink, B., "라깡과 정신의학" (2003), 민음사
  22. Evans, D., "정신분석사전" (1998), 인간사랑
  23. Behler, E. E., "아이러니와 모더니티담론" (2005), 동문선
  24. Paz, O., "흙의 자식들" (2003), 솔
  25. Widmer, P., "홍준기·이승미역" (2000), 욕망의전복
  26. Homer, S., "라깡 읽기" (2005), 은행나무
  27. Zizek, S., "이데올로기라는 숭고한 대상" (2003), 인간사랑
  28. Zizek, S., "삐딱하게 보기" (1995), 시각과 언어
  29. Zizek, S., "그들은 자기가 하는 일을 알지 못하나이다" (2007), 인간사랑
  30. Lacan, J., "Of the Subject of certainty. in: The Seminar ⅩⅠ" (1998), W. W. Norton & Company
  31. Lacan, J., "The Subversion of the subject and the Dialectic of desire. in: Écrits" (2006), W. W. Norton & Company
  32. Kierkegaard, S., "The concept of irony" (1965), Indiana University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)