은유의 개념구조
On the Conceptual Structure of Metaphor
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Metaphor theory is problematic since it is not interpreted literally. The study of metaphoric meaning and fuzzy concept have been developed in the framework of both semantics and pragmatics. Among the many literary styles, a writer's creativity can be recognized clearly in metaphor and fuzzy. Accordingly, many linguists have tried to explain metaphor and fuzzy using the methodologies of linguistics. The ancient philosophers like Aristotle had defined the concept of a metaphor. After the concept of metaphor was defined, many linguists came to discuss metaphor in the view of linguistics. In the 20th century, the concept of metaphor was defined by Richards and Black. According to Black there are three different kinds of views about metaphor: the substitution view, the interaction view and the comparison view. These semantic theories are not sufficient in interpreting metaphor. Therefore, in this paper I'd like to show the limitations of the semantic approaches to metaphor and to find the other way to interpret metaphor in the view of pragmatics.
Abstract
Metaphor theory is problematic since it is not interpreted literally. The study of metaphoric meaning and fuzzy concept have been developed in the framework of both semantics and pragmatics. Among the many literary styles, a writer's creativity can be recognized clearly in metaphor and fuzzy. Accordingly, many linguists have tried to explain metaphor and fuzzy using the methodologies of linguistics. The ancient philosophers like Aristotle had defined the concept of a metaphor. After the concept of metaphor was defined, many linguists came to discuss metaphor in the view of linguistics. In the 20th century, the concept of metaphor was defined by Richards and Black. According to Black there are three different kinds of views about metaphor: the substitution view, the interaction view and the comparison view. These semantic theories are not sufficient in interpreting metaphor. Therefore, in this paper I'd like to show the limitations of the semantic approaches to metaphor and to find the other way to interpret metaphor in the view of pragmatics.
참고문헌 (37)
- Sang-sup Lee, "Aristotle(1987): "Poetics". Selected English Critical Tests" (1987), Shina-sa
- Black, Max, "Metaphor" (1981), Johnson
- Blank, A, "Co-presemce and Succession: A Cognitive Typology of Metanymy in Metanymy in Language and Thought", pp.1999, John Benjamis Publishing Company Amsterdam
- Boons, J. P, "Métaphore et baisse de la redondance" (1971), Lgue fr
- Croft, W, "The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metanymies", Cognitive Linguistics, 4(4), pp.335~370 (1993)
- Dubois, J, "Rhétorique générale" (1970), Paris, Larousse
- Esnault, D, "Metanyny and Metaphor" (1925), Ablex Publishing Corporation, London, England
- Fontanier, I, "Les figures du discours" (1968), Paris, Flammarion
- Gentilhomme, Y, "La proportion langagiere, in Modèles logiques et niveau d'analyse linguisque" (1976), Paris, Klincksiek
- Goslar, M, "Métonymie et métodologie" (1976), Rev. Ling. rom
- Grice, H. P, "Logic and Conversation", Syntax and Semantics, 3, pp.41~58 (1975)
- Grize, J. B, "Le discours analogique, in Représentation des connai- ssances et raisonment dans les sciences de l'homme" (1979), M. Borillo, IRIA-LISH
- Hallyn, F, "Formes métaphoriques dans la poésie lyrique de l'âge baroque en France" (1975), Genève, Droz
- Hennequin, J, "Les oraisons funebres, d'Henri Ⅳ: les themes et la rhetorique" (1978), Paris, Klincke
- Henry, A., "Métonymie et métaphore" (1971), Paris, Klincksiek
- Jakobson, R, "The Metaphoric and Metanymic Poles in Metaphor and Metanymy in Comparison and Contrast", pp.41~47 (2002), Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter
- Jacobson R, "Fundamentals of Language" (1956), Ther Hague, Netherlands: Mouton
- Konrad, J, "Etude sur la métaphore" (1939), Paris, Lavergne
- Kratz, J. Cl, "La notion de séme: essai d'approche á travers les texts d'usage", 석사, pp.1978
- Lakoff, G, "Metaphors We Live By", pp.1980, Chicago
- Lakoff G, "More than Cool Reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor" (1989), Chicago: University of Chicago Press
- Le Guern, M, "Sémantiquede la métaphore et de la métonymie" (1973), Paris, Larouse.1
- Lüdi, G, "Die Metapher als Funktion der Aktualisierung" (1973), Bern, Francke
- Martin, R, "Potentiel et irréel. Esquisse d'une analyse sémantico-logique", pp.417~428 (1981), Mél. E. coseriu, Madrid, Credos
- Miéville, D, "Séquences analogique: types et fonctions, in Discours et analogies Trav" (1977), du Centre de Rech. sémiol., Univ. de Neuchatel
- Molino, J, "Présentation: problèmes de la métaphore", pp.5~40 (1979), Lnguages
- Molino-Soublin-Tamine, "Présentation: problemes de la métaphore" (1979), Langages
- Normand, C, "Métaphore et concept, Bruxelles, Complexe" (1979), Paris, PUF
- Parent, M, "Les images dans <La Colline inspirée> de Barrès" (1963), Trav. Ling. Littèr
- Richards, L. A, "The Philosophy od Rhetoric in Lecture V:Metaphor" (1936), Johnson
- Ricoer, P, "La métaphor vive" (1975), Paris, du seuil
- Sato, N, "Synecdoque, un trope suspect" (1979), Revue d' Esthtique
- Searle, J. R, "Metaphor", Metaphor and Thought, pp.92~123 (1982)
- Soublin, F, "Sur une règle rhétorique d'effacement", pp.102~109 (1971), Lgue fr
- Soublin-Tamine, "Limites de la caracterisation syntaxique des métaphores, in Analyse et validation dans l'etude des textuelles", pp.179~196 (1977), publ. sous la dir. de M. Borilo, Paris, CNRS
- Tamba-Mecz, "Le sens figure dans les aeuvres en prose du XX siecle" (1977), Univ. de Paris-Sorbonne
- Weinrich, H, "Sprache in Texten" (1979), Stuttgart, Klett