은유해석모델
A Model of Metaphor Interpretation
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper aims to suggest a unified model of metaphor interpretation that reconciles two competing models, conceptual metaphor model and attributive categorization model. There has been much debate about which model offers the most veridical account of how people interpret metaphors. But there is the possibility of reconciling two rival models. Proponents of conceptual metaphor and attributive categorization models of metaphor have differently sampled metaphors. Proponents of conceptual metaphor model have chosen relational and double metaphors, but proponents of attributive categorization model have chosen double and attributional metaphors. Also proponents of conceptual metaphor model have chosen novel and conventional metaphors, but proponents of attributive categorization model have chosen conventional and dead metaphors. I here offer a unified model of metaphor interpretation (31). In model (31) there are three types of metaphor. Type 1 metaphors are interpreted in a comparison mode, type 2 metaphors are interpreted in a comparison mode in some contexts and in a categorization mode in other contexts. and type 3 metaphors are interpreted in a categorization mode. Type 1 is novel, relational metaphors, type 2 is conventional, double metaphors, and type 3 is dead, attributional metaphors.
Abstract
This paper aims to suggest a unified model of metaphor interpretation that reconciles two competing models, conceptual metaphor model and attributive categorization model. There has been much debate about which model offers the most veridical account of how people interpret metaphors. But there is the possibility of reconciling two rival models. Proponents of conceptual metaphor and attributive categorization models of metaphor have differently sampled metaphors. Proponents of conceptual metaphor model have chosen relational and double metaphors, but proponents of attributive categorization model have chosen double and attributional metaphors. Also proponents of conceptual metaphor model have chosen novel and conventional metaphors, but proponents of attributive categorization model have chosen conventional and dead metaphors. I here offer a unified model of metaphor interpretation (31). In model (31) there are three types of metaphor. Type 1 metaphors are interpreted in a comparison mode, type 2 metaphors are interpreted in a comparison mode in some contexts and in a categorization mode in other contexts. and type 3 metaphors are interpreted in a categorization mode. Type 1 is novel, relational metaphors, type 2 is conventional, double metaphors, and type 3 is dead, attributional metaphors.
참고문헌 (28)
- Black,M, "More about Metaphor, in Metaphor and Thought", pp.19~43 (1979), Cambridge University Press
- Bortfeld, H, "A cross-linguistic analysis of idiom comprehension by native and non-native speakers", Dissertation abstracts International: Section-B: Sciences and Engineering 59. 0432, 59, pp.432~ (1998)
- Chomsky,N, "Some methodological remarks on generative grammar", Word, 17, pp.219~239 (1961)
- Gentner, D, "Convention, Form, and Figurative Language Processing", Metaphor and Symbol, 16, pp.223~247 (2001)
- Gentner, D., "Evidence for relational selectivity in interpreting analogy and metaphor. In The psychology of learning and motivation", pp.307~358 (1988), Academic
- Gibbs,R.W, "Categorization and metaphor understanding", Psychological Review, 99, pp.572~577 (1992)
- Gibbs, R. W, "The poetics of mind" (1994), Cambridge University Press
- Gildea, P., "On understanding metaphor: The role of context", Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, pp.577~590 (1983)
- Glucksberg,S, "Beyond literal meanings: The psychology of allusion", Psychological Science, 2, pp.146~152 (1991)
- Glucksberg, S., "On understanding nonliteral speech: Can people ignore metaphors?", Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, pp.85~98 (1982)
- Glucksberg, S., "Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity", Psychological review, 97, pp.3~18 (1990)
- Glucksberg, S., "How metaphors work. In Metaphor and thought (2nd ed)", pp.401~424 (1993), Cambridge University Press
- Glucksberg, s., "Property attribution in metaphor comprehension", Journal of Memory and Language, 36, pp.50~67 (1997)
- Grice,H.P, "Logic and Conversation in Syntax and Semantics", Speech Acts, 3, pp.41~58 (1975)
- Inhoff, A., "Contextual effects on metaphor comprehension in reading", Memory and Cognition, 12, pp.558~567 (1984)
- Johnson,M, "The body in the mind: The bodily basis of reason and imagination" (1987), University of Chicago press
- Kovecses,Z, "The language of love" (1988), Bucknell University Press
- Lakoff,G, "Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind" (1987), University of Chicago Press
- Lakoff,G, "The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Metaphor and thought (2nd ed)", pp.202~251 (1993), Cambridge University Press
- Lakoff, G., "Metaphors we live by" (1980), University of Chicago
- Lakoff, G., "More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor" (1989), University of Chicago Press
- McGlone,M.S, "Conceptual metaphors and figurative language interpretation: Food for thought", Journal of Memory and Language, 35, pp.544~565 (1996)
- Murphy,G, "Reasons to doubt the present evidence for metaphoric representation", Cognition, 62, pp.99~108 (1996)
- Ortony,A, "Beyond literal similarity", Psychological Review, 86, pp.161~180 (1979)
- Ortony, A., "Interpreting metaphors and idioms: some effects of context on comprehension", Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, pp.465~477 (1978)
- Thomas, M., "Metaphor as categorization: A connectionist implementation", Metaphor and Symbol, 16, pp.5~27 (2001)
- Tourangeau, R., "Aptness in metaphor", Cognitive Psychology, 13, pp.27~55 (1981)
- Turner,M, "Death is the mother of beauty" (1987), University of Chicago Press