본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Assessing the Post-Cold War US Security Strategy and the Non-Proliferation of the Greater Middle East

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류지역학

초록

Since the US lost a certain amount of its credibility among the international community with its 2003 Iraq invasion and the rise of China, there were analyses that the US unilateral hegemonic status would be degraded. However, there is still no ‘constraint structure’ which could damage US unilateralism. Moreover, in the global security environment of the 21st century where there is no player capable of substituting US hegemony, the strong will of the US to sustain its superiority and unilateralism cannot be ignored even if US power has actually decreased. In particular, in a situation in which there are many analyses viewing China’s potential to become a partner in a new G2 being hindered by it facing the ‘middle income trap’ the hyper-power or hyper-puissance of the US will continue for a considerable period of time. Therefore, this paper will examine the US security strategy and its non-proliferation policy in more detail. It will bring better understanding of why it is important to contemplate US non-proliferation policy through the conceptual lens of coercive diplomacy within a US unipolar system. Moreover, this research will examine the validity of applying the framework of coercive diplomacy to the non-proliferation of the Greater Middle East, particularly which is related to Iran’s nuclear programmes and why it will be naturally dealt with theoretical framework of compellence.

Abstract

Since the US lost a certain amount of its credibility among the international community with its 2003 Iraq invasion and the rise of China, there were analyses that the US unilateral hegemonic status would be degraded. However, there is still no ‘constraint structure’ which could damage US unilateralism. Moreover, in the global security environment of the 21st century where there is no player capable of substituting US hegemony, the strong will of the US to sustain its superiority and unilateralism cannot be ignored even if US power has actually decreased. In particular, in a situation in which there are many analyses viewing China’s potential to become a partner in a new G2 being hindered by it facing the ‘middle income trap’ the hyper-power or hyper-puissance of the US will continue for a considerable period of time. Therefore, this paper will examine the US security strategy and its non-proliferation policy in more detail. It will bring better understanding of why it is important to contemplate US non-proliferation policy through the conceptual lens of coercive diplomacy within a US unipolar system. Moreover, this research will examine the validity of applying the framework of coercive diplomacy to the non-proliferation of the Greater Middle East, particularly which is related to Iran’s nuclear programmes and why it will be naturally dealt with theoretical framework of compellence.

참고문헌 (117)

  1. Brooks, Stephen G., "World Out of Balance: International Relations and the Challenge of American Primacy" (2008), Princeton University Press
  2. Cameron, Fraser, "US Foreign Policy After the Cold War: Global Hegemon or Reluctant Sheriff?" (2002), Routledge
  3. Campbell, Kurt M., "The Power of Balance: America in Asia" (2008), Center for a New American Security
  4. Carnesale, Albert, "Living with Nuclear Weapons" (1983), Harvard University Press
  5. "Tracking the Defence Budget: US Defense Budget Cuts, Sequestration, the FY2014 Budget, and the FY2014-FY2022 Forecast" (2013)[URL]
  6. Dougherty, James E., "American Foreign Policy: FDR to Reagan" (1986), Harper & Row
  7. Fenton, Neil, "Understanding the UN Security Council: coercion or consent?" (2004), Routledge
  8. Foot, Rosemary S., "US Hegemony and International Organizations: The United States and Multilateral Institutions" (2003), Oxford University Press
  9. Fukuyama, Francis, "The End of History and the Last Man" (1993), HarperCollins Publishers
  10. IISS, "Modernising military capabilities; familiar security challenges", The Military Balance, 120 (2020), IISS
  11. Ikenberry, G. John, "America Unrivaled: The Future of the Balance of Power" (2002), Cornell University Press
  12. Im, Kang Taek, "North Korean strategy against Economic sanctions and its implications for further North Korean policy: Daebuk kungge gege-ae daehan bukhan-eui baneungkwa daebuk geoungcheck-eui hameu" (2013), Korea Institute for National Unification Press
  13. Indyk, Martin S., "Bending History: Barack Obama’s Foreign Policy" (2012), Brookings Institution Press
  14. Ishihara, Shintaro, "The Japan That Can Say No" (1991), Harper and Row
  15. Kennedy, Paul M., "Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000" (2000), Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group
  16. Keohane, Robert O., "Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition" (1977), Little & Brown
  17. Kissinger, Henry, "White House Years" (1979), Little, Brown and Co.
  18. Kupchan, Charles A., "The End of the American Era: US Foreign Policy and the Geopolitics of the 21st Century" (2002), Alfred A Knopf
  19. Larson, Eric V., "Defense planning in a decade of change: Lessons from the Base Force, Bottom-up Review and Quadrennial Defense Review" (2001), RAND Corporation
  20. Levey, Zach, "Israel and the Western Powers, 1952-1960" (1960), University of North Carolina Press
  21. Lipson, Charles, "Reliable Partners: How Democracies Have Made a Separate Peace" (2003), Princeton University Press
  22. Mansour, Camille, "Beyond Alliance: Israel and U.S. Foreign Policy" (1994), Columbia University Press
  23. Maugeri, Leonardo, "Oil: The Next Revolution, Geopolitics of Energy Project" (2012), Harvard Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs
  24. O'Hanlon, Michael E., "Defense Strategy for the Post-Saddam Era" (2005), Brookings Institution Press
  25. Oneal, John R., "Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations" (2000), W. W. Norton & Company
  26. Papayoanou, Paul A., "Power Ties: Economic Interdependence, Balancing, and War" (1999), University of Michigan Press
  27. Ray, James L., "Democracy and International Conflict: An Evaluation of the Democratic Peace Proposition" (1998), University of South Carolina Press
  28. Rotberg, Robert I., "The Origin and Prevention of Major Wars" (1989), Cambridge University Press
  29. Russett, Bruce, "Grasping the Democratic Peace" (1994), Princeton University Press
  30. Samore, Gary, "Sanctions Against Iran: A Guide to Targets, Terms, and Timetables" (2015), Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs Press
  31. Scott, James M., "After the End: Making U.S. Foreign Policy in the Post-Cold War World" (1998), Duke University Press
  32. Serra, Narcís, "The Washington Consensus Reconsidered: Towards a New Global Governance" (2008), Oxford University Press
  33. Shambaugh, David, "China Goes Global: The Partial Power" (2013), Oxford University Press
  34. Shlapak, David A., "Shaping the Future Air Force" (2006), RAND cooperation
  35. Tow, William T., "Asia Pacific Strategic Relations: Seeking Convergent Security" (2001), Cambridge University Press
  36. Vogel, Ezra F., "Japan as Number One: Lessons for America" (1985), Harper Torchbooks
  37. Biddle, Stephen D., "Allies, Air Power, and Modern Warfare: The Afghan Model in Afghanistan and Iraq", International Security, 30(3), pp.161~176 (2005)
  38. Blackwill, Robert D., "America's Energy Edge: The Geopolitical Consequences of the Shale Revolution", Foreign Affairs, 93(2), pp.102~114 (2014)
  39. Bleek, Philipp C., "Nuclear Posture Review Released Stresses Flexible Force Planning", Arms Control Today, 32(1), pp.28~ (2002)
  40. Cirincione, Joseph, "ABM Treaty withdrawal: neither necessary nor prudent", Arms Control Today, 32(1), pp.12~20 (2002)
  41. Cohen, Eliot A., "History and the Hyperpower", Foreign Affairs, 83(4), pp.49~63 (2004)
  42. Doyle, Michael W., "Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs", Philosophy & Public Affairs, 12(3), pp.205~235 (1983)
  43. Huntington, Samuel P., "America's changing strategic interests", Survival, 33(1), pp.3~17 (1991)
  44. Huntington, Samuel P., "Why International Primacy Matters", International Security, 17(4), pp.68~83 (1993)
  45. Klare, Michael T., "US Military Policy in the Post-Cold War Era", The Socialist Register, 28, pp.131~142 (1992)
  46. Krauthammer, Charles, "The Unipolar Moment", Foreign Affairs, 70(1), pp.25~33 (1990)
  47. Layne, Christopher, "The Unipolar Illusion: Why New Great Powers Will Rise", International Security, 17(4), pp.5~51 (1993)
  48. Layne, Christopher, "Kant or Cant: the Myth of the Democratic Peace", International Security, 19(2), pp.5~49 (1994)
  49. Layne, Christopher, "Preponderance to Offshore Balancing: America's Future Grand Strategy", International Security, 22(1), pp.86~126 (1997)
  50. Lefebvre, Jeffrey A., "U.S. Military Hegemony in the Arabian", Persian Gulf: How Long Can It Last?, 2003, pp.4(1), 186~190
  51. Maoz, Zeev, "Realist and cultural critiques of the democratic peace: A theoretical and empirical re‐assessment", International Interaction, 24(1), pp.3~89 (1998)
  52. Maoz, Zeev, "Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace 1946-1986", The American Political Science Review, 87(3), pp.624~638 (1993)
  53. Mitchell, Ronald B, "International control of nuclear proliferation: Beyond carrots and sticks", The Nonproliferation Review, 5(1), pp.40~52 (1997)
  54. Naim, Moises, "Fads and Fashion in Economic Reforms: Washington Consensus or Washington Confusion?", Third World Quarterly, 21(3), pp.505~528 (2000)
  55. Obama, Barack, "Renewing American Leadership", Foreign Affairs, 86(4), pp.2~16 (2007)
  56. Panofsky, Wolfgang K. H., "Nuclear Insecurity: Correcting Washington's Dangerous Posture", Foreign Affairs, 86(5), pp.109~118 (2007)
  57. Payne, Keith B., "The Nuclear Posture Review: Setting the Record Straight", The Washington Quarterly, 28(3), pp.135~151 (2014)
  58. Polachek, Solomon W., "Conflict and Trade", Journal of Conflict Resolution, 24(1), pp.55~78 (1980)
  59. Powell, Robert, "Nuclear Deterrence Theory, Nuclear Proliferation, and National Missile Defense", International Security, 27(4), pp.86~118 (2003)
  60. Putnam, Robert D., "Diplomacy and Domestic Policy: The Logic of Two-Level Games", International Organization, 42(3), pp.427~460 (1988)
  61. Reed, William, "Alliance Duration and Democracy", American Journal of Political Science, 41(3), pp.1072~1078 (1998)
  62. Schelling, Thomas C., "What went wrong with Arms Control?", Foreign Affairs, 64, pp.219~233 (1985)
  63. Waltz, Kenneth N., "The Emerging Structure of International Politics", International Security, 18(2), pp.44~79 (1993)
  64. Williamson, John, "What Should the World Bank Think about the Washington Consensus?", World Bank Research Observer, 15(2), pp.251~264 (2000)
  65. Wohlforth, William F., "The Stability of a Unipolar World", International Security, 24(1), pp.5~41 (1999)
  66. Woo,Wing Thye, "China meets the middle-income trap: the large potholes in the road to catching-up", Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 10(4), pp.313~336 (2012)
  67. Zhang, Linxiu, "The human capital roots of the middle-income trap: the case of China", Agricultural Economics, 44(1), pp.151~162 (2013)
  68. Report of the Bottom-up Review, "Aspin, Les", Department of Defense, ~ (1993)
  69. British Petroleum Company, "BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2019" (2019), British Petroleum Co.
  70. National Security Strategy of the United States, "Bush, George H. W.", The White House, ~ (1993)
  71. National Security Strategy of the United States of America, "Bush, George W.", The White House, ~ (2002)
  72. Nuclear Posture Review, "Bush, George W.", The White House, ~ (2002)
  73. National Strategy to Combat Weapons of Mass Destruction, "Bush, George W.", The White House, ~ (2002)
  74. National Security Strategy of the United States of America, "Bush, George W.", The White House, ~ (2006)
  75. National Security Strategy of Engagement and Enlargement, "Clinton, Bill", The White House, ~ (1995)
  76. National Security Strategy for a New Century, "Clinton, Bill", The White House, ~ (1998)
  77. "Remarks to the Center for Global Development" (2010)[URL]
  78. Israel: U.S. Foreign Assistance, "Clyde, Mark", CRS, ~, pp.IB85066 (2005)
  79. Nuclear Command and Control: Current Programs and Issues, "Critchlow, Robert D.", CRS, ~, pp.RL33408 (2006)
  80. Quadrennial Defense Review 2010: Overview and Implications for National Security Planning, "Daggett, Stephen", CRS, ~, pp.R41250 (2010)
  81. Defense Manpower Data Centre, "Total Military Personnel and Dependent End Strength by Service, Regional Area, and Country" (2015), DMDC
  82. "Atoms for Peace Speech at the 470th Plenary Meeting of the United Nations General Assembly" (1953)[URL]
  83. Gates, Robert M., "Quadrennial Defense Review" (2010), US Department of Defense
  84. Gates, Robert M., "Nuclear Posture Reviews" (2010), US Department of Defense
  85. Hagel, Charles T., "Quadrennial Defense Review" (2014), U.S. Department of Defense
  86. "INFCIRC/540 - Model Protocol Additional to the Agreement(s) Between State(s) and the International Atomic Energy Agency for the Application of Safeguards" (1997)[URL]
  87. "Statement by the President on the Draft Treaty to Prevent the Spread of Nuclear Weapons" (1965)[URL]
  88. Achievements of and Outlook for Sanctions on Iran, "Katzman, Kenneth", CRS, ~ (2014)
  89. Iran’s Threat to the Strait of Hormuz, "Katzman, Kenneth", CRS, ~, pp.R42335 (2012)
  90. Mattis, James, "National Defense Strategy" (2018), U.S. Department of Defense
  91. Myers, Richards, "The national military strategy of the United States of America" (2004), Joint Chiefs of Staff
  92. National Security Strategy, "Obama, Barack", The White House, ~ (2010)
  93. National Security Strategy, "Obama, Barack", The White House, ~ (2015)
  94. Adapting to Flexible Response, 1960-1968, "Poole, Walter S.", US Defense Dept. Office of the Secretary of Defense, 1~17 (2013)
  95. Iran’s Threats, the Strait of Hormuz, and Oil Markets: In Brief, "Ratner, Michael", CRS, ~, pp.R45281 (2018)
  96. India and Pakistan: Current U.S. Economic Sanctions, "Rennack, Dianne E.", CRS, ~ (2001)
  97. "Quadrennial Defense Review" (2001)[URL]
  98. Rumsfeld, Donald, "Quadrennial Defense Review" (2006), U.S. Department of Defense
  99. U.S. Foreign Aid to Israel, "Sharp, Jeremy M.", CRS, ~, pp.RL 33222 (2019)
  100. "GDP (current US$), 2020 data retrieved from World Bank national accounts data" (2020)[URL]
  101. Arms Sales in the Middle East: Trends and Analytical Perspectives for U.S. Policy, "Thomas, Clayton", CRS, ~, pp.R44984 (2017)
  102. National Security Strategy, "Trump, Donald", The White House, ~ (2017)
  103. "Charter of the United Nations and Statute of the International Court of Justice" (1945)[URL]
  104. United Nations, "The United Nations and Disarmament 1945-1970", pp.257~259 (1970), United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs
  105. US Department of Defense, "Facing the Future: Meeting the Threats and Challenges of the 21st Century" (2005), US Department of Defense
  106. "Proliferation Security Initiative Participants" (2015)[URL]
  107. US Joint Chiefs of Staff, "Joint Vision 2010" (1996), Department of Defense
  108. "NSC 162/2: A Report to the National Security Council by the Executive Secretary" (1953)[URL]
  109. "Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New START). Bureau of Arms Control" (2010)[URL]
  110. Nonproliferation and Threat Reduction Assistance: U.S. Programs in the Former Soviet Union, "Wolf, Amy F.", CRS, ~, pp.RL31957 (2012)
  111. "The US Shale Revolution" (2015)[URL]
  112. "An Alliance of Democracies" (2004)[URL]
  113. "US Dumps Bunker Buster or Not?" (2005)[URL]
  114. "Meet America’s New 'Bunker-Buster' Super Bomb" (2015)[URL]
  115. "Hitting China’s Wall" (2013)[URL]
  116. "The Clinton economy, in charts" (2012)[URL]
  117. "Don’t Attack Iraq" (2002)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)