Assertive Foreign Policy of Great Powers in the Framework of Realism
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The paper aims to analyze foreign policies of great powers premised upon not so much on the ideological basis of justice but on execution of their own military strategies to obtain political and economic interests in the Post-Cold war era. Then, it studies the outcomes of the US ‘extension of democracy’ political course and the current state of relations between China, Russia and the US. Arguably, foreign policies of great powers are based not so much on the ideological foundation of justice but have been shaped by their political, economic and security priorities. Intergovernmental relations without moral and ethical standards can cause future conflicts as exemplified by Georgian events in 2008. From Russia’s point of view, US foreign policy focuses only on the preservation of their own interests. In light of this, although the SCO’s official position is non-military, it is considered to be opposing NATO. Conclusions of this study are as follows: First, global powers constantly expand their sphere of influence through assertive foreign policies. Second, the Cold War era has evolved into the present system without much change as international conflicts between great powers are covered by ideological rhetoric while premised upon economic, political and security priorities.
Abstract
The paper aims to analyze foreign policies of great powers premised upon not so much on the ideological basis of justice but on execution of their own military strategies to obtain political and economic interests in the Post-Cold war era. Then, it studies the outcomes of the US ‘extension of democracy’ political course and the current state of relations between China, Russia and the US. Arguably, foreign policies of great powers are based not so much on the ideological foundation of justice but have been shaped by their political, economic and security priorities. Intergovernmental relations without moral and ethical standards can cause future conflicts as exemplified by Georgian events in 2008. From Russia’s point of view, US foreign policy focuses only on the preservation of their own interests. In light of this, although the SCO’s official position is non-military, it is considered to be opposing NATO. Conclusions of this study are as follows: First, global powers constantly expand their sphere of influence through assertive foreign policies. Second, the Cold War era has evolved into the present system without much change as international conflicts between great powers are covered by ideological rhetoric while premised upon economic, political and security priorities.
참고문헌 (29)
- Bogaturov. A. D, "History of International relations", pp.600~603 (2006), Kulturnaya revolyutsya
- Bogaturov. A. D, "History of International relations", pp.25~27 (2006), Kulturnaya revolyutsya
- Bogaturov. A. D, "History of International relations", pp.85~86 (2006), Kulturnaya revolyutsya
- Bogaturov. A. D, "World Economy and International Relations", pp.20~29 (2001), IMEMO
- Bogaturov. A. D, "Contemporary world politics", pp.364~ (2009), Aspect Press
- Bogaturov. A. D, "History of International relations", pp.271~274 (2006), Kulturnaya revolyutsya
- Campbell Kurt M, "Far eastern promises: why Washington should focus on Asia", Foreign Affairs (2014)
- Chomsky Noam, "Hegemony or survival: America’s quest for global dominance", pp.11~12 (2004), Metropolitan books
- Fenenko. A. V, "Contemporary world politics", pp.73~78 (2009), Aspect Press
- "The Rise of China and the Future of the West" (2008)[URL]
- Hegel. G, "Hegelian dialectic", ~
- "The Political Support System for American Primacy" (2005)[URL]
- "Relationship between the US and Russia in the contemporary American political science" (2010)[URL]
- Kollman Ken, "The American political system", pp.242~ (2012), W. W. Norton & Company
- Khanna Parag, "The Second world", pp.391~448 (2010), Izdatelstvo Evropa
- Khrustalev. M. A, "International situation analysis and political expertising", pp.54~ (2008), Moscow State Institute of International Relations
- "New Cold war" (2016)[URL]
- "McKoen Rolling OUT NDAA next week, Obama tries to reassure Japan, but won’t draw ‘Red line’" (2014)[URL]
- "The Rise of China and its power status" (2006)[URL]
- Ruban. L. S, "Geopolitical interests of Russian Federation at Far East", pp.62~ (2006), Izdatelstvo Nauka
- "Security Challenges Confronting the Asia-Pacific Region", Secretary’s Albright Inter- vention at Sixth ASEAN Regional Forum, 10(7), pp.3~6 (1999), US Depart- ment of State Dispatch
- Toshenko. J. T, "Political sociology", pp.530~534 (2014), Izdatelstvo Yurait
- Panarin. A. S, "Political science", pp.94~ (2003), Izdatelstvo «Delo»
- "US rejects China worry on missile interceptor" (2015)[URL]
- "Brief introduction to the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation" (2015)[URL]
- Tsygankov. P. A, "Sociology of international relations", pp.43~68 (2008), Aspect Press
- Tsygankov. P. A, "Sociology of international relations", pp.49~ (2008), Aspect Press
- "Novaya Holodnaya Voyna" (2014)[URL]
- Zongze Ruan, "Revaluation of American strategy in Asian-Pacific region", The world politics, (4), pp.155~160 (2014)