본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

고전시가 모호성의 교육적 이해

The Educational Understanding of Ambiguity in Classic Poetry

1

조회

0

다운로드

12

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

In this study, I focused on the point that ambiguity has unique characteristics and existence value in classic poetry in contrast with that it is generally considered as negative in the viewpoint of language activity. Besides, I tried to probe the educational meaning. Unlike the cases of modern poetry, the ambiguity of classic poetry generates unintentionally by distance of time & space which lies in between the creation and the reception of text. On the basis of fundamental factors of literature, the ambiguity of classic poetry can be said to result from motives such as the polysemy of meaning relation, the historicity of meaning reception and the difficulty of meaning decoding. Above all things, creating multiple relations of signifiant and signifié results in the polysemy of meaning relation, outstanding in discourse expressions which consist of messages effectively for specific object. It calls in propriety problems of language activity according to situation and context. Moreover, it has educational meaning, that is, the improvement of language competence in that it is kind of expression strategy to improve efficiency of communication. Secondly, the historicity of meaning reception has to do with the change of meaning by the distance of time & space between the creation and the reception of text. The process that the meaning of text expands and opens boundlessly according to socio-cultural backgrounds which surround readers enables the readers to constitute his/her personalized meaning. In addition to that, it provides them with a shot in the arm for education that it makes them extend and enlarge the range and the depth of understanding. Here, we can find the educational meaning, what is called, the expansion of the horizon of understanding. Thirdly, the difficulty of meaning decoding means that readers have difficulty in deciphering the transcription itself or they can not grasp the symbolic meaning of the object definitely. Suggesting several explanation of such unintelligible parts to learners is not recommended. It is more appropriate that learners compose inquiry activities which organize the meaning of works by themselves. It connects with the promotion of inquiry capability for independent appreciation of literature. Through it, this study demonstrated that the ambiguity of classic poetry has educational meaning like the improvement of language competence, the expansion of the horizon of understanding and the promotion of inquiry capability.

Abstract

In this study, I focused on the point that ambiguity has unique characteristics and existence value in classic poetry in contrast with that it is generally considered as negative in the viewpoint of language activity. Besides, I tried to probe the educational meaning. Unlike the cases of modern poetry, the ambiguity of classic poetry generates unintentionally by distance of time & space which lies in between the creation and the reception of text. On the basis of fundamental factors of literature, the ambiguity of classic poetry can be said to result from motives such as the polysemy of meaning relation, the historicity of meaning reception and the difficulty of meaning decoding. Above all things, creating multiple relations of signifiant and signifié results in the polysemy of meaning relation, outstanding in discourse expressions which consist of messages effectively for specific object. It calls in propriety problems of language activity according to situation and context. Moreover, it has educational meaning, that is, the improvement of language competence in that it is kind of expression strategy to improve efficiency of communication. Secondly, the historicity of meaning reception has to do with the change of meaning by the distance of time & space between the creation and the reception of text. The process that the meaning of text expands and opens boundlessly according to socio-cultural backgrounds which surround readers enables the readers to constitute his/her personalized meaning. In addition to that, it provides them with a shot in the arm for education that it makes them extend and enlarge the range and the depth of understanding. Here, we can find the educational meaning, what is called, the expansion of the horizon of understanding. Thirdly, the difficulty of meaning decoding means that readers have difficulty in deciphering the transcription itself or they can not grasp the symbolic meaning of the object definitely. Suggesting several explanation of such unintelligible parts to learners is not recommended. It is more appropriate that learners compose inquiry activities which organize the meaning of works by themselves. It connects with the promotion of inquiry capability for independent appreciation of literature. Through it, this study demonstrated that the ambiguity of classic poetry has educational meaning like the improvement of language competence, the expansion of the horizon of understanding and the promotion of inquiry capability.

참고문헌 (33)

  1. 권국명, "문학작품 해석의 논리와 구조 연구", 어문학, 76, pp.199~219 (2002), 한국어문학회
  2. 김광해, "국어지식교육론" (1997), 서울대출판부
  3. 김대행, "<龜旨歌>를 위한 利用厚生的 질문 in : 국어교과학의 지평" (1995), 서울대출판부
  4. 김대행, "문학교육원론" (2000), 서울대출판부
  5. 김석회, "상촌 신흠 시조 연구", 국어교육, 109, pp.12~346 (2002), 한국어교육학회
  6. 金性彦, "<龜旨歌>의 해석 in : 한국문학사의 쟁점" (1986), 집문당
  7. 김준오, "시론" (1991), 삼지원
  8. 김진우, "시와 언어" (1998), 한국문화사
  9. 서울대 국어교육연구소, "고등학교 국어(상)" (2002), 교육인적자원부
  10. 성기옥, "申欽 時調의 해석 기반-<放翁詩餘>의 연작가능성", 진단 학보, (81), pp.215~241 (1996), 진단학회
  11. 윤여탁, "시와 함께 배우는 시론" (2001), 태학사
  12. 윤흥섭, "중의성, 애매성 그리고 함의", 영어영문학연구, 40(2), pp.263~285 (1998), 한국중앙영어영문학회
  13. 李澤東, "近體詩 意味 解釋의 曖昧性", 서강어문, 14, pp.287~313 (1998), 서강어문학회
  14. 정민, "한시미학산책" (1996), 솔
  15. 정병헌, "<청산별곡>의 해석과 이미지 in : 한국고전문학의 교육적 성찰" (2003), 숙명여대 출판국
  16. 정재찬, "<청산별곡>에 관한 문학교육적 독해 in : 문학교육의 현상과 인식" (2004), 역락
  17. 정정덕, "시어의 애매성 연구", 語學論誌, (3), pp.93~115 (1998), 창원대학교
  18. 정정순, "영랑 초기시의 시작 원리 연구", 국어교육학연구, 18, pp.409~432 (2003), 국어교육학회
  19. 조희정, "교과서 수록 고전 제재 변천 연구 -건국 과도기부터 제7차 교육과정기까지 중등 국어 교과서를 중심으로", 문학교육학, 27(17), pp.281~330 (2005), 한국문학교육학회
  20. 조희정, "교과서 수록 고전 제재 변천 연구 (1)-건국 과도기부터 제7차 교육과정기까지 문헌 제재를 중심으로", 문학교육학, 41(19), pp.411~444 (2006), 한국문학교육학회
  21. 최동호, "시 읽기의 즐거움" (1999), 고려대 출판부
  22. 최홍원, "신흠의 시조와 경험교육 연구", 문학교육학, 23(25), pp.239~266 (2008), 한국문학교육학회
  23. 최홍원, "‘역군은(亦君恩)’ 표현과 경험의 세계-관념적 표현의 교육적 자질에 대한 小考-", 고전문학과 교육, 11(16), pp.117~146 (2008), 한국고전문학교육학회
  24. 허왕욱, "朝鮮時代 詩歌에 나타난 同音異義現象의 活用 樣相", 국어교육, 109, pp.15~424 (2002), 한국어교육학회
  25. 袁行霈, "중국시가예술연구" (1999), 아세아문화사
  26. Bruner Jerome S., "The Process of education(교육의 과정)" (1992), 배영사
  27. Culler Jonathan, "Literary Theory(문학이론)" (1999), 동문선
  28. Emile Benveniste, "Probelèmes de linguistique générale Ⅰ(일반언어학의 제문제)" (1992), 민음사
  29. Empson, W., "Seven types of ambiguity" (1965), Penguin Books
  30. Kempson R. M., "Semantic theory" (1977), Cambridge University Press
  31. Kempson R. M., "Ambiguity and Quantification", Linguistics and philosophy, 4, pp.259~309 (1989)
  32. Richards I. A., "The principles of literary criticism(문학비평의 원리)" (2005), 동인
  33. Wheelwright Philip Ellis, "Metaphor and reality(은유와 실재)" (1988), 문학과지성사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)