인지언어학적 어휘 연구를 위한 말뭉치 기반 접근 - ‘시간’을 중심으로 -
A Corpus Based Approach to Cognitive Linguistic Study of Lexis - Focused on the Word ‘Time’ -
1
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The objective of this study is first to assess quantitatively the different usages of the word ‘time’ based on the sentences extracted from a corpus and containing that word, and ultimately to interpret the concept of ‘time’ through the lens of cognitive linguistics by classifying its usages into semantic function categories. First of all, this paper is a study of lexis that combines corpus-linguistic methods of treating data with cognitive linguistic methods of interpreting data. Such a methodology has enabled me to conduct a research that is both quantitative and qualitative and, thereby, to enrich my interpretation while preserving objectivity. The quantitative analysis of the semantic categories of the word ‘time’ has yielded the following results. The word ‘time’ most frequently collocates with predicates such as ‘kellita (take time), huluta (time goes by), ponayta (spend time), issta (have time), cinata (time passes by)’. As for the semantic categories of ‘time’, I have found as prevailing conceptualizations the following: ‘resource’, ‘movement’, ‘space’, ‘inanimate objects’, ‘animate beings’. These results show how humans conceptualize the abstract notion of ‘time’. While they primarily conceptualize ‘time’ as ‘resource’, ‘movement’, and ‘space’, the conceptualization of time as a resource has appeared to be the most prevalent of all. This study has, however, its limitations. It could not verify whether the data, which was randomly collected, were representative of the morphologic and semantic characteristics of the word ‘time’. Besides, not all the concordances of the lemma ‘time’ extracted from the corpus could be analysed. These limitations are expected to be addressed in a follow-up paper.
Abstract
The objective of this study is first to assess quantitatively the different usages of the word ‘time’ based on the sentences extracted from a corpus and containing that word, and ultimately to interpret the concept of ‘time’ through the lens of cognitive linguistics by classifying its usages into semantic function categories. First of all, this paper is a study of lexis that combines corpus-linguistic methods of treating data with cognitive linguistic methods of interpreting data. Such a methodology has enabled me to conduct a research that is both quantitative and qualitative and, thereby, to enrich my interpretation while preserving objectivity. The quantitative analysis of the semantic categories of the word ‘time’ has yielded the following results. The word ‘time’ most frequently collocates with predicates such as ‘kellita (take time), huluta (time goes by), ponayta (spend time), issta (have time), cinata (time passes by)’. As for the semantic categories of ‘time’, I have found as prevailing conceptualizations the following: ‘resource’, ‘movement’, ‘space’, ‘inanimate objects’, ‘animate beings’. These results show how humans conceptualize the abstract notion of ‘time’. While they primarily conceptualize ‘time’ as ‘resource’, ‘movement’, and ‘space’, the conceptualization of time as a resource has appeared to be the most prevalent of all. This study has, however, its limitations. It could not verify whether the data, which was randomly collected, were representative of the morphologic and semantic characteristics of the word ‘time’. Besides, not all the concordances of the lemma ‘time’ extracted from the corpus could be analysed. These limitations are expected to be addressed in a follow-up paper.
참고문헌 (31)
- 김동환, "인지언어학과 의미" (2005), 태학사
- 김해연, "국어 코퍼스에 나타난 '얼굴'의 은유적 의미의 인지언어학적 분석", 언어와언어학, (49), pp.23~46 (2010), 언어연구소
- 김해연, "국어 문어 말뭉치에 나타난 ‘혀’의 의미와 용법 분석", 언어와언어학, (64), pp.31~56 (2014), 언어연구소
- 남길임, "어휘의 공기 경향성과 의미적 운율", 한글, (298), pp.135~164 (2012), 한글학회
- 남길임, "‘이론으로서의 말뭉치언어학’에 대한연구 현황과 쟁점", 한국어 의미학, 46, pp.163~187 (2014), 한국어의미학회
- 박정운, "앞으로 한 달 뒤에 만납시다: 시간의 개념적 은유", 언어와 언어학, 23, pp.85~110 (1998), 언어와 언어학회
- 서은영, "‘-겠-’의 텍스트 장르별 사용 양상 연구", 한국어 의미학, 43, pp.247~270 (2014), 한국어의미학회
- 서혜경, "국어 어휘의미 교육의 인지언어학적 연구", 박사, 국어교육학, pp.2014
- 송현주, "관용 표현의 인지언어학적 접근 - 의식주 관용 표현을 중심으로", 국제언어문학, 31(31), pp.69~93 (2015), 국제언어문학회
- 송현주, "국어 동기화의 인지언어학적 탐색" (2015), 한국문화사
- 염철호, "시간 인지 모형에 대한 비판적 고찰", 언어과학연구, (64), pp.249~268 (2013), 언어과학회
- 임지룡, "문법 교육의 인지언어학적 탐색" (2014), 태학사
- 임지룡, "비유의 인지언어학적 탐색" (2015), 태학사
- 임지룡, "‘시간’의 개념화 양상", 어문학, 77, pp.201~222 (2002), 한국어문학회
- 임지룡, "의미의 인지언어학적 탐색" (2008), 한국문화사
- 임태성, "한국어의 '시간' 속성과 모형 연구", 석사, 국어학, pp.2010
- 임혜원, "공간 개념의 은유적 확장 연구 : 국어 대화 말뭉치를 중심으로", 박사, 국어학, pp.2004
- 정병철, "당구공 모형으로 보는 한국어 사동 표현의 동기화", 담화와 인지, 22(1), pp.79~102 (2015), 담화·인지언어학회[DOI]
- 정수진, "개념적 혼성 이론에 기초한 한국어 의미구성", 어문학, (116), pp.81~102 (2012), 한국어문학회
- 지인영, "시간과 공간에 대한 인지언어학적 분석:시간표현에 사용된 공간표현을 중심으로", 영어학, 12(4), pp.977~999 (2012), 한국영어학회
- 최진아, "인지언어학에 기초한 비유 교육 연구", 박사, 국어교육학과 국어교육전공, pp.2013
- 홍달오, "한국어 시간 표현의 인지언어학적 고찰 -동사 ‘보내다", 지내다’의 의미 비교를 중심으로-, 2009, pp.(41), 127~155[DOI]
- 吉本一, "‘시간의 화살’에 대한 인지언어학적 고찰", 담화와 인지, 9(1), pp.1~19 (2002), 담화·인지언어학회
- 吉本一, "시간의 자원화 양상", 담화와 인지, 13(3), pp.229~246 (2006), 담화·인지언어학회
- Deignan, A., "Metaphor and Corpus Linguistics" (2005), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Evans, V., "The structure of time: Language, meaning and temporal cognition" (2003), John Benjamins Publishing
- Evans, V., "인지언어학 기초" (2008), 한국문화사
- Geeraerts, D., "인지언어학 옥스퍼드 핸드북" (2011), 로고스라임
- Gries, S., "Corpora in Cognitive Linguistics: Corpus-Based Approach to Syntax and Lexis" (2006), Mouton de Gruyter
- Hunston, S., "Pattern Grammar A Corpus-Driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English" (2000), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Stefanowitsch, A., "Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy" (2006), Mouton de Gruyter