본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

최명익 소설에 나타난 사랑의 의미 고찰

A Study on the Meaning of Love Shown in the Works of Choi Myeong-Ik

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

Based on Greimas’s ‘semiotic square’, this paper seeks to analyze the novels of Choi Myeong-Ik in the late 1930s to structure the meaning of love, and based on the structuralized relationships of meaning, discerned the meaning of love. Through the aspects of love, it is possible to apprehend the author’s orientation towards modernization.  In his novels, ‘prescripted love’ shown by ethical love between married couples, or its contrary ‘interdit love” represented by homosexuality or incest were not present. However, women’s adultery, the contradiction of ‘prescripted love’ which is ‘un-prescripted love’ or ‘un-interdit love’ shown as men’s adultery, the contradiction of ‘interdit love’ were present. Jeong-Il and Mun-Ju’s love in <Characterless man>, Mun-Il and Gye -Hyang’s love in <역설> and Myeong-Il and Mun-Ju’s love in <Simmun> were ‘un-interdit love’, whereas Geum-Nyeo and the truck driver’s love in <Spring and the new Road> was ‘un-prescripted love’. Contrary to ‘un -interdit love’ represented by men’s adultery, women’s adultery, thus ‘un- prescripted love’ by Geum-Nyeo was fatally punished by death. Therefore, no preference were shown to socially accepted love, and at the same time, none were shown to love that overly escaped social standards. Moreover, love has gone from an intelligent one where the intellectuals’ self-awareness were clashing to an instinctive one where the common seeks to fulfil the basic needs. The result of each were drawn to a woman’s death for breaking a moral taboo. It is possible to note that a woman, ‘a subject of deprivation’, rather than a man ‘a subject of abandonment’ was centered in the work in order to paradoxically seek chances of hope. However, in <Characterless man>, there was criticism for the ideality of intellectuals where they blindly refused the power of capitals, through the act of Jeong-Il betraying the love for Mun-Ju. Nonetheless, it does not mean that the act was passively affirmed. Mun-Il from <Paradox> criticized those who were subject to the power of capitals, even refusing the offer as principal of his own school. Through <Simmun>, Hyeon Il-Yeong betrays Yeo-Ok’s love and commercializes her. This showed how much one could corrupt under the control of money. In <Spring and the New Road>, Geum-Nyeo from the country was seeking basic instincts and envying modern city life, then drove herself to destruction. This shows that she is a victim of exotic modernization. In turn, Choi Myeong Ik criticized the immature modern capitalist society through the negative aspects of love.

Abstract

Based on Greimas’s ‘semiotic square’, this paper seeks to analyze the novels of Choi Myeong-Ik in the late 1930s to structure the meaning of love, and based on the structuralized relationships of meaning, discerned the meaning of love. Through the aspects of love, it is possible to apprehend the author’s orientation towards modernization.  In his novels, ‘prescripted love’ shown by ethical love between married couples, or its contrary ‘interdit love” represented by homosexuality or incest were not present. However, women’s adultery, the contradiction of ‘prescripted love’ which is ‘un-prescripted love’ or ‘un-interdit love’ shown as men’s adultery, the contradiction of ‘interdit love’ were present. Jeong-Il and Mun-Ju’s love in <Characterless man>, Mun-Il and Gye -Hyang’s love in <역설> and Myeong-Il and Mun-Ju’s love in <Simmun> were ‘un-interdit love’, whereas Geum-Nyeo and the truck driver’s love in <Spring and the new Road> was ‘un-prescripted love’. Contrary to ‘un -interdit love’ represented by men’s adultery, women’s adultery, thus ‘un- prescripted love’ by Geum-Nyeo was fatally punished by death. Therefore, no preference were shown to socially accepted love, and at the same time, none were shown to love that overly escaped social standards. Moreover, love has gone from an intelligent one where the intellectuals’ self-awareness were clashing to an instinctive one where the common seeks to fulfil the basic needs. The result of each were drawn to a woman’s death for breaking a moral taboo. It is possible to note that a woman, ‘a subject of deprivation’, rather than a man ‘a subject of abandonment’ was centered in the work in order to paradoxically seek chances of hope. However, in <Characterless man>, there was criticism for the ideality of intellectuals where they blindly refused the power of capitals, through the act of Jeong-Il betraying the love for Mun-Ju. Nonetheless, it does not mean that the act was passively affirmed. Mun-Il from <Paradox> criticized those who were subject to the power of capitals, even refusing the offer as principal of his own school. Through <Simmun>, Hyeon Il-Yeong betrays Yeo-Ok’s love and commercializes her. This showed how much one could corrupt under the control of money. In <Spring and the New Road>, Geum-Nyeo from the country was seeking basic instincts and envying modern city life, then drove herself to destruction. This shows that she is a victim of exotic modernization. In turn, Choi Myeong Ik criticized the immature modern capitalist society through the negative aspects of love.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. 김성도, "구조에서 감성으로 그레마스의 기호학 및 일반 의미론의연구" (2002), 고려대학교출판부
  2. 김예림, "1930년대 후반의 비관주의와 윤리의식에 대한 고찰-최명익을 중심으로", 상허학보, 4, pp.299~324 (1998), 상허학회
  3. 김효주, "최명익 소설 연구" (2014), 푸른사상
  4. 김해연, "최명익 소설에 나타난 여성 소외의 문제", 오늘의 문예비평, pp.76~88 (1992)
  5. 박수현, "에로스", 타나토스 간(間) ‘내적 분열’의 양상과 의미 -최명익의 소설 <무성격자>와 <비 오는 길>을 중심으로, 2009, pp.(37), 327~354[DOI]
  6. 박종홍, "최명익 소설의 ‘행동자’ 고찰", 현대소설연구, (60), pp.231~258 (2015), 한국현대소설학회
  7. 박종홍, "최명익 소설의 ‘역설’ 고찰", 국어교육연구, (61), pp.257~280 (2016), 국어교육학회(since1969)[DOI]
  8. 박종홍, "<심문>의 ‘질투’ 고찰", 국어국문학, (175), pp.175~195 (2016), 국어국문학회
  9. 박진영, "근대를 살아가는 지식인의 내면세계―최명익 소설을 중심으로", 우리어문연구, (20), pp.365~388 (2003), 우리어문학회
  10. 서영채, "사랑의 문법: 이광수, 염상섭, 이상" (2004), 민음사
  11. 오주리, "최명익(崔明翊)의 「무성격자(無性格者)」에 나타난 죽음의 의미 연구 - ‘의식의 흐름(Stream of consciousness)’과의 관련성을 중심으로", 한국근대문학연구, (32), pp.425~454 (2015), 한국근대문학회[DOI]
  12. 이재선, "한국현대소설사" (1979), 홍성사
  13. 임지룡, "인지의미론" (1997), 탑출판사
  14. 장수익, "최명익론-승차 모티프를 중심으로", 외국문학, (44), pp.132~156 (1995), 열음사
  15. 전영태, "최명익론:자의식의 갈등과 그 해결의 양상", 선청어문, (10), pp.97~123 (1979), 서울대학교 국어교육과
  16. 조연현, "자의식의 비극-최명익론", 백민, (17), pp.132~137 (1949)
  17. 조정래, "1930년대 한국 모더니즘 작가 연구", pp.204~231 (1999), 평민사
  18. 진정석, "최명익 소설에 나타난 근대성의 경험양상", 민족문학사연구, (8), pp.179~199 (1995), 소명출판
  19. 최용호, "그레마스의 의미생성 모델에 대한 비판적 고찰 - 의미와 설화성을 중심으로", 언어와언어학, (38), pp.163~184 (2006), 언어연구소
  20. 최현희, "식민자의 미학과 피식민자의 문학: 전체화하는 자본, 식민지 모더니즘의 문학주의", 상허학보, 45, pp.9~42 (2015), 상허학회
  21. 최혜실, "1930년대 한국 심리소설 연구 : 최명익을 중심으로", 석사, pp.1986
  22. 홍정표, "정념기호학" (2014), 한국외국어대학교출판부
  23. 그레마스, "의미에 관하여: 기호학적 시론" (1997), 인간사랑
  24. 재크린 살스비, "낭만적 사랑과 사회" (1985), 민음사
  25. Lonald Schleifer, "A .J. Greimas and the Nature of Meaning: Linguistics, Semiotics and Discourse Theory" (1987), Un iversity of Neb raska Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)