본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

최명익 소설의 수사학적 연구

A Rhetorical Research on Choi Myeong‐ik’s Novels

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

From the viewpoint of rhetoric as a communication strategy, this study examined difference in rhetorical strategies observed in Choi Myeong‐ik’s early work A Rainy Road and another work Jangsamisa, which shows the signs of change from his early works, and discussed the world of his literary works. Taking note of the basic characteristics of the novel genre, we divided the sub‐strategies of rhetoric viewpoint into the rhetoric of narration, rhetoric of structure, and rhetoric of value, and analyzed the two novels based on them. A Rainy Road uses the rhetoric of dual narration distinguishing between the narrator and the focalizer, the rhetoric of structure foregrounding the juxtaposition and confrontation of characters, and the rhetoric of value raising the ethical voice of the self isolated from the world. As a result, although the self with strong self‐consciousness has the desire to step forward as a subject, it returns to its own world of self‐consciousness where the self is rather objectified from the world and abandons its will to communicate with the world. Jangsamisa uses the rhetoric of narration in which the self assumes the attitude of an onlooker yet steps forward as an observer who looks at the world as a subject, the rhetoric of structure accumulating meanings through repeating tension and relaxation, and the rhetoric of value in which the logos consciousness of the self works, recognizing and criticizing problems in the world. As a result, although the self is an observer it is described in a changed image that looks at the world outside of itself and recognizes problems in the world critically. Of course, the self in Jangsamisa is not so active in communication with the world either. At least, however, it is aware of problems in the world and look at them critically. This suggests that the self of Choi Myeong‐ik’s novels expanded its potential for sympathetic communication with the world.

Abstract

From the viewpoint of rhetoric as a communication strategy, this study examined difference in rhetorical strategies observed in Choi Myeong‐ik’s early work A Rainy Road and another work Jangsamisa, which shows the signs of change from his early works, and discussed the world of his literary works. Taking note of the basic characteristics of the novel genre, we divided the sub‐strategies of rhetoric viewpoint into the rhetoric of narration, rhetoric of structure, and rhetoric of value, and analyzed the two novels based on them. A Rainy Road uses the rhetoric of dual narration distinguishing between the narrator and the focalizer, the rhetoric of structure foregrounding the juxtaposition and confrontation of characters, and the rhetoric of value raising the ethical voice of the self isolated from the world. As a result, although the self with strong self‐consciousness has the desire to step forward as a subject, it returns to its own world of self‐consciousness where the self is rather objectified from the world and abandons its will to communicate with the world. Jangsamisa uses the rhetoric of narration in which the self assumes the attitude of an onlooker yet steps forward as an observer who looks at the world as a subject, the rhetoric of structure accumulating meanings through repeating tension and relaxation, and the rhetoric of value in which the logos consciousness of the self works, recognizing and criticizing problems in the world. As a result, although the self is an observer it is described in a changed image that looks at the world outside of itself and recognizes problems in the world critically. Of course, the self in Jangsamisa is not so active in communication with the world either. At least, however, it is aware of problems in the world and look at them critically. This suggests that the self of Choi Myeong‐ik’s novels expanded its potential for sympathetic communication with the world.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. 박성창, "수사학" (2005), 문학과지성사
  2. 장수익, "최명익" (2008), 한길사
  3. Aristotle, "수사학 Ⅰ" (2007), 리젬
  4. Aristotle, "수사학 Ⅱ" (2007), 리젬
  5. Aristotle, "수사학 Ⅲ" (2008), 리젬
  6. Booth, Wayne C., "소설의 수사학" (1990), 한신문화사
  7. Guerrero, José Antonio Hernández, "수사학의 역사" (2001), 문학과지성사
  8. Reboul, Olivier., "수사학" (2003), 한길사
  9. Levitt, Morton P., "The Rhetoric of Modernist Fiction" (2006), University Press of New England
  10. 구수경, "최명익 소설의 서사기법 연구", 현대소설연구, 15 (2001)
  11. 김윤식, "최명익론. in: 한국 현대 현실주의 소설 연구" (1990), 문학과지성사
  12. 김혜영, "최명익 소설의 글쓰기 방식 연구", 논문집, 61 (1997), 한국어교육학회
  13. 신형기, "한 모더니스트의 행로. in: 비오는 길" (2007), 문학과지성사
  14. 윤애경, "최명익 심리소설의 서술방식과 현실인식 양상", 현대문학이론연구, (24), pp.225~246 (2005), 현대문학이론학회
  15. 이재선, "의식 과잉자의 세계. in: 한국 현대소설사" (1979), 홍성사
  16. 정현숙, "나르시시즘과 변혁의지", 현대소설연구, 8 (1998), 한국현대소설학회
  17. 정현숙, "崔明翊 小說에 나타난 隱喩", 어문연구(語文硏究), 33(1), pp.253~277 (2004), 한국어문교육연구회
  18. 차혜영, "최명익 소설의 양식적 특성과 그 의미", 한국학논총, 25 (1994), 한양대학교 한국학연구소

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)