최명익 창작집 「장삼이사」의 초점화 양상 고찰
A Study on Focalization in the novels of Choi Myeong-ik listed on 「Jang Sam I Sa」
0
조회
0
다운로드
13
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
This paper specifically went through the process of three types of focalization coming true in the novels of Choi Myeong-ik listed on 『Jang Sam I Sa』. The introduction of the work was more focused on because the process, in which the frame of the narration and the imagination of the readers is combined, begins at the very beginning of the writing. 4 out of 6 works was about “internal focalization", taking a considerably big portion. In these cases, usually the seperated consciousness of a learned man is the focalizer, then a learned woman who is similar to the focalizer and a snobbish man who is different from the focalizer are the sub-focalizer. However, in cases like <Rainy Road>, <Paradox>, <A man with no characteristics> where the narrator does not exist with the characters, the indifferent attitude of the focalizers were turning into willingness. Also, when the narrator existed with the characters as of heterodiegestic internal focalization in <Interrogation>, in the midst of the influence of the object of focalization, the possibility of the focalizers seperated consciousness combining was shown. This shows the gradual change in the consciousness of the author. In the first stories of each, <Spring and the new road> as of zero focalization, and <Jang Sam I Sa> as of homodiegetic external focalization, the learned focalizer is gone, or his proportion has diminished considerably. And women arose as the main object of focalization, and their sadness or will to live on due to the suppressing circumstances was more focused on. These are only 2 of the many, but they held great importance because they showed a significant change of the author himself. Thus, Choi Myeong-ik was showing how learned people looked into themselves effectively through internal focalization, and at the same time used zero focalization and external focalization to show women's sadness and strong will to survive. Through this, we can know that Choi Myeong-ik is choosing appropriate focalization to show his purpose of writing in order to achieve great success in literature.
Abstract
This paper specifically went through the process of three types of focalization coming true in the novels of Choi Myeong-ik listed on 『Jang Sam I Sa』. The introduction of the work was more focused on because the process, in which the frame of the narration and the imagination of the readers is combined, begins at the very beginning of the writing. 4 out of 6 works was about “internal focalization", taking a considerably big portion. In these cases, usually the seperated consciousness of a learned man is the focalizer, then a learned woman who is similar to the focalizer and a snobbish man who is different from the focalizer are the sub-focalizer. However, in cases like <Rainy Road>, <Paradox>, <A man with no characteristics> where the narrator does not exist with the characters, the indifferent attitude of the focalizers were turning into willingness. Also, when the narrator existed with the characters as of heterodiegestic internal focalization in <Interrogation>, in the midst of the influence of the object of focalization, the possibility of the focalizers seperated consciousness combining was shown. This shows the gradual change in the consciousness of the author. In the first stories of each, <Spring and the new road> as of zero focalization, and <Jang Sam I Sa> as of homodiegetic external focalization, the learned focalizer is gone, or his proportion has diminished considerably. And women arose as the main object of focalization, and their sadness or will to live on due to the suppressing circumstances was more focused on. These are only 2 of the many, but they held great importance because they showed a significant change of the author himself. Thus, Choi Myeong-ik was showing how learned people looked into themselves effectively through internal focalization, and at the same time used zero focalization and external focalization to show women's sadness and strong will to survive. Through this, we can know that Choi Myeong-ik is choosing appropriate focalization to show his purpose of writing in order to achieve great success in literature.
참고문헌 (27)
- 구수경, "최명익 소설의 서사기법 연구-심리소설을 중심으로", 현대소설연구, (15), pp.141~159 (2001), 한국현대소설학회
- 김동리, "신세대의 정신", 문장, 2(5), pp.80~96 (1940)
- 김민정, "1930년대 후반기 모더니즘 소설 연구-최명익과 허준을 중심으로", 석사, pp.1994
- 김성진, "최명익 소설에 나타난 근대적 시·공간 체험", 현대소설연구, 20(9), pp.203~221 (1998), 한국현대소설학회
- 김윤식, "최명익론, in 한국 현대 현실주의 소설 연구" (1990), 문학과지성사
- 김치홍, "최명익의 <장삼이사> 고", 명지어문학, (19), pp.195~206 (1990), 명지대 국어국문학과
- 양문규, "최명익 소설연구", 인문학보, (9), pp.21~41 (1990), 강릉대
- 윤부희, "최명익 소설연구", 석사, pp.1993
- 윤애경, "최명익 심리소설의 서술방식과 현실인식 양상", 현대문학이론연구, (24), pp.225~246 (2005), 현대문학이론학회
- 이동하, "최명익론-세계의 폭력과 지식인의 소외, in 월북문인연구", pp.131~144 (1989), 문학사상사
- 이재선, "한국현대소설사" (1979), 홍성사
- 장수익, "최명익론-승차 모티프를 중심으로, in 외국문학", pp.132~156 (1995), 열음사
- 전영태, "최명익론-자의식의 갈등과 그 해결의 양상", 선청어문, 10, pp.97~123 (1979), 서울대 국어교육과
- 조연현, "자의식의 비극, in 백민", pp.132~137 (1949)
- 진정석, "최명익 소설에 나타난 근대성의 경험양상", 민족문학사연구, (8), pp.179~199 (1995), 민족문학사연구소
- 차혜영, "최명익 소설의 양식적 특성과 그 의미", 한국학론집, (25), pp.221~239 (1994), 한양대 한국학연구소
- 채호석, "리얼리즘에의 도정-최명익론, in 한국문학의 리얼리즘과 모더", pp.195~211 (1989), 민음사
- 최혜실, "1930년대 한국 심리소설소설연구-최명익을 중심으로-", 석사, pp.1998
- 수잔 스나이드 랜서, "시점의 시학" (1998), 좋은날
- 보리스 우스펜스키, "소설구성의 시학" (1992), 현대소설사
- 제라르 즈네뜨, "서사담론" (1992), 교보문고
- 츠베탕 토도로브, "구조시학" (1977), 문학과지성사
- F. K. Stanzel, "소설의 이론" (1990), 문학과 비평사
- Géard Genette, "Narrative Discourse" (1980), Cornell University Press
- Norman Friedman, "Form and Meaning in Fiction" (1975), The University of Georgia Press
- Tzvetan Todorov, "Qu'est-ce que le structuralisme? 2 Pétique, Ѐdition du Seuil", ~ (1973)
- Wayne C. Booth, "The Rhetoric of Fiction" (1961), The University of Chicago Press
