파시즘과 리리시즘의 상관성 연구 - 일제 말기 서정시의 경우

Abstract

Fascism and lyricism are alike in the principle of identity and transcendence. Fascism make an individual unify into the whole, people unify into the nation. These totalitarian characteristics of fascism appear in Japanese fascism well. Japanese fascism has organized a colonial Korean to win the Sino-Japanese War and the Pacific War in totalitarian. And fascism tried to build a utopia that overcome the modern age. Japanese fascism asserted the construction of the Orient that overcome the Western modern age. Meanwhile lyricism has the identity of the subject and object, the lyrical transcendence against reality. Therefore lyricism can proceed to fascism by identity and transcendence. In the end of Japanese imperialism Kim Jong-han and Seo Jeong-ju stuck to lyricism, but they sang Japanese fascism. But fascism is different from lyricism in the origin of awareness and the aspect of realization of identity and transcendence. Fascism is based on a modern epistemology, that is to say a principle that the subject dominate the object. Thus fascism select the subject-central identification way. It prove that Japanese fascism ideology and an oppressive policies are based on the ideology. And then fascism aimed at the transcendence of the modern age, but as a matter of fact it is the extreme aspect of instrumental reason. On the other hand lyricism select an equal identification way of the subject and object. Such lyricism is a radical criticism against the modern age. Kwon Hwan and Jeong Ji-yong resisted fascism by being faithful to the nature of lyricism in the end of Japanese imperialism.