‘언어의 본질’ 교육 내용에 대한 이론적 탐색
The Theoretical Research for the Educational Content of the Nature of Language: - Focusing on the nature of language as a complex adaptive system -
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study theoretically explores of the “nature of language” based on the concept of language as a complex adaptive system (CAS). A review of previous studies and the current educational content showed that the educational content mostly consists of activities that enable the understanding of universal characteristics of language as fragmentary knowledge. It was found that the current educational content does not provide a holistic understanding of the nature of language. This paper therefore focuses on “language as a CAS”. A CAS is a system in which new concepts emerge through the interactions of autonomous agents. Language is essentially a social product that emerges through the interaction of cognition, usage, and culture. Based on this premise, the study of linguistics, semiotics, linguistic instinct and evolution, and language as a CAS was examined to interpret the essential characteristics of language as a CAS. Through the semiotic nature of language, this study explored the possibility of understanding the dynamic meaning construction process as an emergence and simultaneously recognizing the relationship between humans and language. Language creativity can be interpreted as a principle of a discrete combinatorial system that creates infinite languages using finite components. The arbitrary nature of language is an important characteristic of language phenomena. It is also a significant condition for the emergence of a discrete combinatorial system, a powerful means of conveying thoughts, and a feature that enables virtual belief through symbols. It is necessary to understand language phenomena that emerge via social interactions fundamentally through the social and historical nature of language. Moreover, it is possible to recognize the linguistic subject, who causes gradual change in language while actively participating in language use. Comprehending the segmentation and abstraction of language in relation to the conceptualization and categorization of the world can enable us to understand the constant interactions between language, thought, society, and culture.
Abstract
This study theoretically explores of the “nature of language” based on the concept of language as a complex adaptive system (CAS). A review of previous studies and the current educational content showed that the educational content mostly consists of activities that enable the understanding of universal characteristics of language as fragmentary knowledge. It was found that the current educational content does not provide a holistic understanding of the nature of language. This paper therefore focuses on “language as a CAS”. A CAS is a system in which new concepts emerge through the interactions of autonomous agents. Language is essentially a social product that emerges through the interaction of cognition, usage, and culture. Based on this premise, the study of linguistics, semiotics, linguistic instinct and evolution, and language as a CAS was examined to interpret the essential characteristics of language as a CAS. Through the semiotic nature of language, this study explored the possibility of understanding the dynamic meaning construction process as an emergence and simultaneously recognizing the relationship between humans and language. Language creativity can be interpreted as a principle of a discrete combinatorial system that creates infinite languages using finite components. The arbitrary nature of language is an important characteristic of language phenomena. It is also a significant condition for the emergence of a discrete combinatorial system, a powerful means of conveying thoughts, and a feature that enables virtual belief through symbols. It is necessary to understand language phenomena that emerge via social interactions fundamentally through the social and historical nature of language. Moreover, it is possible to recognize the linguistic subject, who causes gradual change in language while actively participating in language use. Comprehending the segmentation and abstraction of language in relation to the conceptualization and categorization of the world can enable us to understand the constant interactions between language, thought, society, and culture.
참고문헌 (59)
- 고경난, "기호이데올로기 - 문화적 번역 사례를 통해 본 인류학과 기호학의 교차점", 기호학 연구, 55, pp.51~75 (2018), 한국기호학회[DOI]
- 구본관, "2015 교육과정 ‘문법’ 영역에 대한 비판적 검토", 국어교육학연구, 51(1), pp.89~133 (2016), 국어교육학회[DOI]
- 김기혁, "언어 이야기" (2012), 경진
- 김성도, "퍼스의 기호 사상" (2018), 민음사
- 김윤신, "국어 문법 교육 내용으로서의 ‘언어의 본질과 기능’에 대한 연구", 언어학, (74), pp.25~50 (2016), 사단법인 한국언어학회[DOI]
- 김은성, "문법교육 내용의 표상체로서의 담화 - 문법교육 내용화 방안의 변화 모색을 위한 시론", 문법 교육, 16, pp.83~110 (2012), 한국문법교육학회[DOI]
- 남지애, "언어의 본질과 특성", 교육과정 설계의 방향, 한국문법교육학회 학술발표논문집, 2016(1), pp.86~98 (2016), 한국문법교육학회
- 남지애, "문법 탐구 공동체의 학습 경험에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2018
- 남지애, "‘국어의 특성’ 교육의 관점 정립에 관한 연구 - 언어유형론적 관점을 중심으로 -", 국어교육연구, (43), pp.71~111 (2019), 국어교육연구소[DOI]
- 삼성경제연구소, "복잡성과학의 이해와 적용" (1997), 삼성경제연구소
- 신명선, "‘단어에 대한 앎’의 의미에 기반한 어휘 교육의 방향 설정 연구", 국어교육, (124), pp.349~386 (2007), 한국어교육학회
- 신명선, "국어과 교육내용의 교과서 구현 방식의 관례성과 오개념 - 문법 영역의 ‘언어의 본질과 특성’을 중심으로 -", 문법 교육, 31, pp.87~134 (2017), 한국문법교육학회[DOI]
- 신명선, "문법 학습자의 언어적 주체로의 성장 과정에 대한 사례 연구", 어문학, (147), pp.73~129 (2020), 한국어문학회[DOI]
- 신현정, "개념과 범주적 사고" (2011), 학지사
- 유영만, "‘단순한’ 학습의 ‘복잡성’: 복잡성 과학에 비추어 본 학습 복잡계 구성과 원리", Andragogy Today: Interdisciplinary Journal of Adult & Continuing Education (IJACE), 9(2), pp.53~96 (2006), 한국성인교육학회
- 윤성노, "복잡계로서 단어의 의미론적 정체성에 대한 학제적 연구 - 구조의미론, 분석철학, 해석기호학을 중심으로 -", 기호학 연구, 44, pp.177~202 (2015), 한국기호학회
- 윤영수, "복잡계 개론 : 세상을 움직이는 숨겨진 질서 읽기" (2005), 삼성경제연구소
- 이관희, "‘언어의 특성’의 문법교육 내용화 방향", 국어교육, (141), pp.31~65 (2013), 한국어교육학회
- 이춘근, "문법 교육의 목적", 우리말연구, 10, pp.169~191 (2000), 우리말학회
- 장영준, "언어학101" (2014), 한국문화사
- 채현식, "어휘부의 자기조직화", 한국언어문학, (63), pp.129~145 (2007), 한국언어문학회
- 채현식, "어휘부란 무엇인가-인접 학문 분야와와 관계를 중심으로", 國語學, (66), pp.307~334 (2013), 국어학회[DOI]
- 황영삼, "기호학의 주체 문제에 관한 고찰", 기호학 연구, 43, pp.262~282 (2015), 한국기호학회
- Beckner, C., "Language Is a Complex Adaptive Systems: Position Paper", Language Learning, 59(1), pp.1~26 (2009)
- Croft, W., "Studying language as a complex adaptive system", English Linguistics, 31(1), pp.1~21 (2014)
- Davis, B., "혁신교육, 철학을 만나다: 복잡성 이론과실천 교육의 뿌리를 찾아서" (2011), 살림터
- Davis, B., "마음과 학습: 교육학의 복잡계적 접근" (2017), 교육과학사
- Ellis, N. C., "The Emergence of Language as a Complex Adaptive System", The Routledge Handbook of Applied Linguistics, 2011(1), pp.654~667 (2011)
- Eco, U, "기호: 개념과 역사" (2009), 열린책들
- 김성도, "기호학과 언어철학" (2009), 열린책들
- Harari, Y. N, "사피엔스" (2015), 김영사
- 김희봉, "네번째 불연속" (2001), 사이언스북스
- Johnson, N., "복잡하지만 단순하게-복잡한 세상에도 패턴은 있다" (2020), 바다출판사
- Kenneally, C., "언어의 진화" (2007), 알마
- Liszka, J. J., "퍼스 기호학의 이해" (2013), 한국외국어대학교 출판부
- Massip-Bonet, À., "Language as a complex adaptive system:Towards an integrative linguistics", Understanding Complex Systems, pp.35~60 (2013)
- Maturana, H. R., "앎의 나무" (1984), 갈무리
- Nordström, J., "Language as a discrete combinatorial system, rather than a recursive-embedding one", The Linguistic Review, 31(1), pp.151~191 (2014)
- Pinker, S., "언어본능" (1998), 그린비
- Pinker, S., "단어와 규칙" (2009), 사이언스북스
- Saussure, de F., "일반언어학 강의", 민음사 (1992)
- Smith, K., "Complex systems in language evolution: the curtural emergence of compositional structure", Advances in Complex Systems, 6(4), pp.537~558 (2003)
- 변정민, "언어 학습의 생태학과 기호학-사회문화적 관점으로" (2017), 사회평론아카데미
- 김지은, "언어학의 이해를 위한 언어나라의 앨리스" (2014), 한국문화사
- 노진서, "(율이 들려주는) 언어학 강의" (2009), 케임브리지
- 남미영, "국어 (1-1)" (2017), 교학사
- 노미숙, "국어(1-1)" (2017), 천재교육
- 류수열, "국어(1-1)" (2017), 금성출판사
- 박영목, "국어(1-1)" (2017), 천재교육
- 최홍원, "중학교 국어 1-1" (2017), 지학사
- 이은영, "국어(1-1)" (2017), 동아출판사
- 김진수, "국어(1-2)" (2017), 비상교육
- 신유식, "국어(1-2)" (2017), 미래엔
- 이도영, "국어(1-2)" (2017), 창비
- 방민호, "언어와 매체" (2018), 미래엔
- 민현식, "언어와 매체" (2018), 천재교육
- 이관규, "언어와 매체" (2018), 비상교육
- 이삼형, "언어와 매체" (2018), 지학사
- 최형용, "언어와 매체" (2018), 창비