‘NP에’, ‘NP에서’, ‘NP로’, ‘NP를’ 이동 구문의 연구
A Comparison of ‘e’, ‘eseo’, ‘ro’, ‘reul’ Movement Construction Structure's Signification
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to reveal the difference in the signification of ‘e’, ‘eseo’, ‘ro’, and ‘reul’ by comparing the signification of the ‘e V movement’, ‘eseo V movement’, ‘ro V movement’, and ‘NP reul to V movement’ sentence structures from the perspective of ‘windowing of attention’ cognition semantics. In addition, this study examines the properties of verbs (including extended signatures) that have movement signification in which the ‘NPe’, ‘NPeseo’, ‘NPro’, ‘NPreul’ construction structure combines them in movement paths, depending on the difference between 'distribution of attention. In the movement frame of event, movement path events are activated by ‘e V movement’, ‘eseo V movement’, ‘ro V movement’, ‘reul V movement’. The ‘e V movement’ opens an attention window to the final stage of open movement paths and blocks attention from the initial and medial stages. Therefore, the combination pattern of the windowing of attention of the ‘e V movement’ can be expressed as ‘initial gapping + final windowin’. The combination pattern of windowing of attention of the ‘eseo V movement’ can be summarized as ‘initial windowing + final gapping’. The ‘ro V movement’ can evoke both the medial stage- and final stage-related scenes of movement paths. However, the final stage windowing of the movement is more prominent than the medial stage windowing of the movement. The windowing combination pattern of the ‘ro V movement’ can be seen as ‘initial gapping + medial windowing + final secondary windowing’. The ‘reul V movement’ can activate ‘closed path’ frames of events. ‘eul(을)/reul(를)’, a component of the construction structure, can be explained by a postposition attached to an object, result, or object in which movement is involved. If one kind of component changes in the ‘NP postposition V movement’ construction structure, other components often change accordingly. Also, the contextual signification of the entire sentence and an imaginary marker, the way in which a person perceives and expresses the internal temporal structure of an event or state of affairs, can also affect the combination of each component. It is difficult to list all possible situations, but in this study, only the aspect of the verb and aspect that has the closest relationship was considered. Humans create significant language forms through the correspondence between basic image schema and language signs extracted from them with numerous world experiences. When the movement signification represented by the movement verb reflects cognition experiences such as initial, medial, and final stage windowing of attention of movement paths evoked by ‘e’, ‘eseo’, ‘ro’, ‘reul’ construction, it can form a sentence structure of the same series.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to reveal the difference in the signification of ‘e’, ‘eseo’, ‘ro’, and ‘reul’ by comparing the signification of the ‘e V movement’, ‘eseo V movement’, ‘ro V movement’, and ‘NP reul to V movement’ sentence structures from the perspective of ‘windowing of attention’ cognition semantics. In addition, this study examines the properties of verbs (including extended signatures) that have movement signification in which the ‘NPe’, ‘NPeseo’, ‘NPro’, ‘NPreul’ construction structure combines them in movement paths, depending on the difference between 'distribution of attention. In the movement frame of event, movement path events are activated by ‘e V movement’, ‘eseo V movement’, ‘ro V movement’, ‘reul V movement’. The ‘e V movement’ opens an attention window to the final stage of open movement paths and blocks attention from the initial and medial stages. Therefore, the combination pattern of the windowing of attention of the ‘e V movement’ can be expressed as ‘initial gapping + final windowin’. The combination pattern of windowing of attention of the ‘eseo V movement’ can be summarized as ‘initial windowing + final gapping’. The ‘ro V movement’ can evoke both the medial stage- and final stage-related scenes of movement paths. However, the final stage windowing of the movement is more prominent than the medial stage windowing of the movement. The windowing combination pattern of the ‘ro V movement’ can be seen as ‘initial gapping + medial windowing + final secondary windowing’. The ‘reul V movement’ can activate ‘closed path’ frames of events. ‘eul(을)/reul(를)’, a component of the construction structure, can be explained by a postposition attached to an object, result, or object in which movement is involved. If one kind of component changes in the ‘NP postposition V movement’ construction structure, other components often change accordingly. Also, the contextual signification of the entire sentence and an imaginary marker, the way in which a person perceives and expresses the internal temporal structure of an event or state of affairs, can also affect the combination of each component. It is difficult to list all possible situations, but in this study, only the aspect of the verb and aspect that has the closest relationship was considered. Humans create significant language forms through the correspondence between basic image schema and language signs extracted from them with numerous world experiences. When the movement signification represented by the movement verb reflects cognition experiences such as initial, medial, and final stage windowing of attention of movement paths evoked by ‘e’, ‘eseo’, ‘ro’, ‘reul’ construction, it can form a sentence structure of the same series.
참고문헌 (25)
- 고석주, "말뭉치 기반 국어 연구 총서13 현대 한국어 조사의 연구 Ⅰ: ‘격 개념’과 조사 ‘-가’와 ‘-를’을 중심으로" (2004), 한국문화사
- 구본관 외, "한국어 문법 총론Ⅱ" (2015), 집문당
- 고영근, "국어 진행상형태의 처소론적 해석", 어학연구, 16(1), pp.41~55 (1980), 국언어학회[DOI]
- 남기심, "국어 조사의 용법-‘-에’와 ‘-로’를 중심으로-" (1993), 박이정
- 남신혜, "한국어 상적 보조용언 구성의 용언 결합 양상" (2019), 신구문화사
- 도재학, "우언적 구성의 개념과 유형에 대하여", 國語學, (71), pp.259~304 (2014), 국어학회[DOI]
- 박진호, "시제, 상, 양태", 國語學, (60), pp.289~322 (2011), 국어학회[DOI]
- 박창영, "한국어 공간동사의 의미 유형과 사건구조 -인지언어학적 어휘의미론의 관점에 따라-", 언어와 정보 사회, 31, pp.171~216 (2017), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
- 박창영, "한국어 공간사건의 언어화 양상 연구", 박사, pp.2020
- 이정택, "이용주 박사 회갑기념논문집" (1989), 도서출판 한샘
- 임동훈, "한국어의 장소 표시 방법들", 國語學, (82), pp.101~125 (2017), 국어학회[DOI]
- 임태성, "‘걸치다’ 구문의 다의성 연구", 어문론총, (81), pp.39~64 (2019), 한국문학언어학회[DOI]
- 정병철, "한국어 문법교육의 인지적 토대" (2017), 박이정
- 洪允基, "相的 意味의 두 要素", 어문연구(語文硏究), 30(1), pp.59~92 (2002), 한국어문교육연구회
- 홍윤표, "방향성 표시의 격", 국어학, 6, pp.111~132 (1978), 국어학회
- 정병철, "한국어 문법 교육의 인지적 토대" (2017), 박이정
- 정수진, "국어 공간동사의 유형과 의미 양상", 어문학, (109), pp.63~97 (2010), 한국어문학회
- 정수진, "인지언어학에 기초한 한국어 공간 개념 부사격 조사의 교육 내용 기술 방안 연구 -‘에’, ‘에서’, ‘로’를 중심으로-", 어문학, (112), pp.79~110 (2011), 한국어문학회
- Goldberg, A., "구문문법" (1995), 한국문화사
- Langacker, R. W, "인지문법의 토대 : 이론 적 선행조건들" (1999), 박이정
- Talmy, L., "The windowing of attention in Language, Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning" (1996), Oxford University Press
- Talmy, L., "Toward a Cognitive Semantics VolumeⅠ: Concept Structuring Systems" (2000), MIT Press
- Talmy, L., "Toward a Cognitive Semantics VolumeⅡ: Typology and Process in Concept Structuring" (2000), MIT Press
- Taylor, J. R, "인지문법" (2005), 한국문화사
- Ungerer, F., "An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics" (2008), Longman
