‘-더니/-었더니’의 의미와 통사적 특징 연구 - 한국어 학습자를 위한 교육내용 구축 면에서 -
A Study on the Semanitic Functions and Syntactic Constraints of '-deoni/-eossdeoni'.
1
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper examines the semantic and syntactic characteristics to the connective endings '-deoni' and '-eossdeoni'. It has been claimed in previous many studies and korean study books that they have the same meanings and syntactic constraints. But semantically, while '-deoni' indicates sequential, contrasting, supplementary and causal relation, '-eossdeoni' indicates sequential, reactive, discovering, contrasting, supplementary and causal relation. Also syntactically, two connective ending are different. First, '-eossdeoni' does not have a 'subject agreement constraint', while '-deoni' requires mostly a 'subject agreement constraint in the pre-clause and post-clause. Second, '-eossdeoni' has the first person, second person or third person's activity in pre-clause, but '-deoni' does not have the first person's activity in pre-clause. Third, while '-deoni' has the witness event of speaker or the speaker's feelings in pre-clause and post-clause, '-eossdeoni' has the activity of the first person or the second and third person in pre-clause, having of different person' activity in post-clause. Therefore, '-deoni' and '-eossdeoni' should be separate to the different connective endings and should be taught to korean learners.
Abstract
This paper examines the semantic and syntactic characteristics to the connective endings '-deoni' and '-eossdeoni'. It has been claimed in previous many studies and korean study books that they have the same meanings and syntactic constraints. But semantically, while '-deoni' indicates sequential, contrasting, supplementary and causal relation, '-eossdeoni' indicates sequential, reactive, discovering, contrasting, supplementary and causal relation. Also syntactically, two connective ending are different. First, '-eossdeoni' does not have a 'subject agreement constraint', while '-deoni' requires mostly a 'subject agreement constraint in the pre-clause and post-clause. Second, '-eossdeoni' has the first person, second person or third person's activity in pre-clause, but '-deoni' does not have the first person's activity in pre-clause. Third, while '-deoni' has the witness event of speaker or the speaker's feelings in pre-clause and post-clause, '-eossdeoni' has the activity of the first person or the second and third person in pre-clause, having of different person' activity in post-clause. Therefore, '-deoni' and '-eossdeoni' should be separate to the different connective endings and should be taught to korean learners.
참고문헌 (20)
- 남기심, "국어 연결어미의 쓰임", pp.101~105 (1994), 서광학술자료사
- 朴載蓮, "過去 時制를 나타내는 ‘-었더-’에 대하여", 어문연구(語文硏究), 31(4), pp.85~110 (2003), 한국어문교육연구회
- 서정수, "‘었더니’에 관하여", 눈뫼 허웅박사 환갑기념 논문집, pp.329~357 (1978)
- 서정수, "국어문법-수정증보판" (1996), 한양대학교 출판원
- 송재목, "안맺음씨끝 ‘-더-’의 의미 기능에 대하여: 유형론적 관점에서", 국어학, 32, pp.135~169 (1998)
- 송재목, "‘-으니’와 ‘-더니’, ‘-었더니’의 의미기능: 접속관계를 중심으로", 한국어 의미학, 34, pp.185~212 (2011), 한국어의미학회
- 송재목, "‘-더니’와 ‘-었더니’: 선어말어미 ‘-더-’와의 관련성을 중심으로", 國語學, 60(60), pp.33~67 (2011), 국어학회
- 송재영, "연결 어미 ‘-더니’ 연구", 國語學, (53), pp.177~198 (2008), 국어학회
- 이금희, "한국어 교육에서의 간접인용문 변형", 반교어문연구, (26), pp.81~102 (2009), 반교어문학회
- 이예령, "한국어 학습자를 위한 ‘-더니’와 ‘-었더니’ 교육 방안 연구", 석사, pp.2010
- 이효상, "다각적 시각을 통한 국어의 시상체계 분석", 언어, 20(3), pp.207~250 (1995)
- 임동훈, "현대국어 어미 ‘느’의 범주와 변화", 國語學, (59), pp.3~44 (2010), 국어학회
- 임채훈, "‘감각적 증거’ 양태성과 한국어 어미 교육- ‘-네’, ‘-더라’, ‘-더니’, ‘-길래’ 등을 중심으로", 이중언어학, (37), pp.199~234 (2008), 이중언어학회
- 임홍빈, "다시 {-더-}를 찾아서", 국어학, 23, pp.255~323 (1993)
- 장경희, "국어의 양태 범주의 설정과 그 체계", 언어, 20(3), pp.191~205 (1995)
- 정희정, "연결어미 ‘-더니’의 의미와 통사 기능 및 제약", 석사, pp.1996
- 최동주, "현대국어 선어말 {-더-}의 의미에 대하여-마침법의 경우", 언어연구, 7, pp.83~117 (1993)
- 최유미, "어미 연속체 ‘었더니’의 의미와 통사", 석사, pp.1998
- Laurel J. Brinton, "Lexicalization and language change" (2009), Cambridge Univ. press
- Joan Bybee, "The Evolution of Grammar" (1994), Chicago Uni. Press