국어 연결어미 ‘-더니’와 ‘-었더니’의 구성 연구
A study on the composition of Korean connectives ‘-deoni’ and ‘-eossdeoni’,
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to review the composition of Korean connectives ‘-deoni’ and ‘-eossdeoni’. The seeming difference between ‘-deoni’ and ‘-eossdeoni’ is just the existence of the pre-final ending ‘-eoss-’, but there is a difference between these two connectives. We reviewed the composition of ‘-deoni’ and ‘-eossdeoni’. There are many disputes in the linguistic research of the Korean language over the construction of ‘-deoni’ and ‘-eossdeoni’. This can be summed up in two ways. One is that ‘-deoni’ and ‘-eossdeoni’ can be seen in the form of <‘-deo-’+‘-(e)ni’> and <‘-eoss-’+‘-deoni(‘-deo-’+‘-(e)ni’)’>, respectively, and the other is that ‘-deoni’ and ‘-eossdeoni’ can be seen as one independent form that can no longer be separated. The result is that ‘-deoni’ includes ‘-deo-’, but there is a difference in the usage of ‘-deoni’ and ‘-eossdeoni’ and they should be viewed as an independent form. The difference between ‘-deoni’ and ‘-eossdeoni’ can be seen as the result of the existence of ‘-eoss-’; therefore, this is the evidence of the formation of ‘-eossdeoni’ as a <‘-eoss-’+‘-deoni’>. However, there are differences in the usage of ‘-eossdeoni’ and ‘-deoni’, which are the evidence of taking ‘-eossdeoni’ as an independent form.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to review the composition of Korean connectives ‘-deoni’ and ‘-eossdeoni’. The seeming difference between ‘-deoni’ and ‘-eossdeoni’ is just the existence of the pre-final ending ‘-eoss-’, but there is a difference between these two connectives. We reviewed the composition of ‘-deoni’ and ‘-eossdeoni’. There are many disputes in the linguistic research of the Korean language over the construction of ‘-deoni’ and ‘-eossdeoni’. This can be summed up in two ways. One is that ‘-deoni’ and ‘-eossdeoni’ can be seen in the form of <‘-deo-’+‘-(e)ni’> and <‘-eoss-’+‘-deoni(‘-deo-’+‘-(e)ni’)’>, respectively, and the other is that ‘-deoni’ and ‘-eossdeoni’ can be seen as one independent form that can no longer be separated. The result is that ‘-deoni’ includes ‘-deo-’, but there is a difference in the usage of ‘-deoni’ and ‘-eossdeoni’ and they should be viewed as an independent form. The difference between ‘-deoni’ and ‘-eossdeoni’ can be seen as the result of the existence of ‘-eoss-’; therefore, this is the evidence of the formation of ‘-eossdeoni’ as a <‘-eoss-’+‘-deoni’>. However, there are differences in the usage of ‘-eossdeoni’ and ‘-deoni’, which are the evidence of taking ‘-eossdeoni’ as an independent form.
참고문헌 (20)
- 목정수, "한국어 문법론" (2003), 월인
- 목정수, "한국어, 그 인칭의 비밀" (2014), 태학사
- 박기덕, "한국어 연결접사에 관한 연구 ‘-고, -다가, -더니, -면서’의 통사적 제약", 언어와 언어학, (23), pp.1~15 (1999)
- 朴載蓮, "過去 時制를 나타내는 ‘-었더-’에 대하여", 어문연구(語文硏究), 31(4), pp.85~110 (2003), 한국어문교육연구회
- 박진호, "韓國語에서 證據性이나 意外性의 의미성분을 포함하는 문법요소", 언어와 정보 사회, 15, pp.1~25 (2011), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
- 서정수, "수정 증보판 국어문법", pp.1255~1257 (1996), 한양대학교 출판원
- 손욱, "한국어 어미 ‘-더니’와 ‘-었더니’ 연구", 석사, pp.2019
- 송재목, "인식양태와 증거성", 한국어학, 44, pp.27~53 (2009), 한국어학회
- 송재목, "‘-으니’와 ‘-더니’, ‘-었더니’의 의미기능: 접속관계를 중심으로", 한국어 의미학, 34, pp.185~212 (2011), 한국어의미학회
- 송재목, "‘-더니’와 ‘-었더니’: 선어말어미 ‘-더-’와의 관련성을 중심으로", 國語學, (60), pp.33~67 (2011), 국어학회[DOI]
- 송재영, "연결 어미 ‘-더니’ 연구", 國語學, (53), pp.177~198 (2008), 국어학회[DOI]
- 송창선, "‘-(었)더니’의 형태와 기능", 한글, (306), pp.51~74 (2014), 한글학회
- 연세대학교 언어정보개발연구원, "연세한국어사전" (1998), ㈜ 두산동아
- 이금희, "‘-더니", -었더니’의 의미와 통사적 특징 연구 - 한국어 학습자를 위한 교육내용 구축 면에서 -, 2011, pp.7(3), 183~205[DOI]
- 이필영, "‘-었더니’의 통사와 의미", 어문연구, 69, pp.61~87 (2011), 어문연구학회[DOI]
- 이희자, "한국어 학습자용 어미·조사 사전" (2001), 한국문화사
- 임채훈, "‘감각적 증거’ 양태성과 한국어 어미 교육- ‘-네’, ‘-더라’, ‘-더니’, ‘-길래’ 등을 중심으로-", 이중언어학, (37), pp.199~234 (2008), 이중언어학회[DOI]
- 장광군, "한국어 연결어미의 표현론" (1999), 월인
- Ferdinand, D. H., "The Expresssion of Modality" (2006), Mouton de Gruyter
- Thomas, W., "Information and Intonation in Natural Language Modality", Ph.D., pp.1988