조건을 나타내는 ‘-다가는, -고는, -어서는, -고서는’에 대하여
On the conditional connective endings ‘-daganeun(다가는), -goneun(고는), -eoseoneun(어서는), -goseoneun(고서는)’.
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The aim of this paper is to investigate the semantic expansion process of compound endings of the connective endings '-daga(다가), -go(고), -eoseo(어서), -goseo(고서) and the particle '-neun(는)' were combined. These compound connective endings signify the conditional meaning. And the meaning are derived from contrastive or exclusive meaning of the particle ‘-neun(는)’. These endings were differentiated from the simply combined forms ‘-daganeun, -goneun, -eoseoneun, -goseoneun’ by the syntactic and semantic characteristics. And These endings have the semantic characteristic that the following clause should be come negative content, also the syntactic characteristics that the front clause should be come the case marker ‘-i/ga(이/가)’ and the following clause should be come a declarative sentence or a interrogative sentence. If the following clause come an imperative sentence or proposal sentence, the sentence is not right.
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to investigate the semantic expansion process of compound endings of the connective endings '-daga(다가), -go(고), -eoseo(어서), -goseo(고서) and the particle '-neun(는)' were combined. These compound connective endings signify the conditional meaning. And the meaning are derived from contrastive or exclusive meaning of the particle ‘-neun(는)’. These endings were differentiated from the simply combined forms ‘-daganeun, -goneun, -eoseoneun, -goseoneun’ by the syntactic and semantic characteristics. And These endings have the semantic characteristic that the following clause should be come negative content, also the syntactic characteristics that the front clause should be come the case marker ‘-i/ga(이/가)’ and the following clause should be come a declarative sentence or a interrogative sentence. If the following clause come an imperative sentence or proposal sentence, the sentence is not right.
참고문헌 (17)
- 구현정, "조건과 주제", 언어, 14, pp.53~75 (1989), 한국언어학회
- 구현정, "범언어적으로 본 조건 범주의 문법화", 한국어 의미학, 4, pp.161~188 (1999)
- 김종록, "보조사 ‘-는’ 통합형 접속어미의 사전 표제어 분석", 어문학, (102), pp.67~87 (2008), 한국어문학회
- 김진수, "가정․조건문과 원인․이유문 고찰", 어문연구, 12, pp.71~98 (1983)
- 박승윤, "담화의 기능상으로 본 한국어의 주제", 언어, 11(1), pp.1~15 (1986)
- 박재연, "연결어미와 양태 : 이유, 조건, 양보의 연결어미를 중심으로", 한국어 의미학, 30, pp.119~141 (2009), 한국어의미학회
- 서태룡, "한국어의 조건과 주제", 성심여자대학교 논문집, 13, pp.1~37 (1982)
- 엄정호, "격의 개념과 한국어의 조사", 國語學, 19(62), pp.199~223 (2011), 국어학회
- 이기갑, "‘-다가’의 의미 확대", 어학연구, 40(3), pp.543~572 (2004), 언어교육원
- 이재성, "연결어미 ‘-다가’의 의미, 통사적 특징, In 국어연결어미의 쓰임", pp.155~202 (1994), 서광학술자료사
- 임동훈, "조사의 통사론과 의미론", 제35회 한국어학회 집중 강좌 발표문, pp.1~19 (2008)
- 임동훈, "‘은", 는’과 종횡의 의미 관계, 2012, pp.21(64), 217~271[DOI]
- 전영철, "대조 화제와 대조 초점의 표지 b>", b>, 2006, pp.17(274), 171~200[DOI]
- 최상진, "인과관계 형성의 인지과정과 연결어미의 상관성 - ‘-어서’, ‘-니까’, ‘-면’ 등을 중심으로", 國語學, 12(52), pp.127~152 (2008), 국어학회
- Chungmin lee, "Contrastive Topic and Focus: What's on Our Minds", 인지과학작업, 1, pp.21~38 (2000), 서울대 인지과학연구소
- Haiman. J., "Conditionals are Topics", Language, 64(3), pp.567~589 (1978), Linguistic Society of America
- Song, S., "Korean Connection: A Reanalysis of ‘Transferentive’", Korean Linguistics, 3 (1983), The International Circle of Korean Linguistics