본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

상생적 다문화교육의 방법론 모색: 다종교시대의 이슬람을 중심으로

A Search of Methods for Multicultural Education of Reciprocal Living Coincidentia Oppositorum: In the Case of Islam in the Age of Multireligion.

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

Multicultural education aims to realize ‘Citizenship Education in a Global Age’ premised on the multicultural society. There is a criticism, however, that Korea is not to be considered a multicultural society since it does not constitute a multiethnic society in a strict sense. Accordingly, multicultural education cannot but be ideological as well since it borrows ideas and theories intactly from the West, whose situation is quite different from ours. Given the fact, however, that the Muslims are increasing, the assertion of Korea‘s multiculturalism being ideological is not appropriate. The Muslims come from a number of different countries and are yet too small in number to form an ethnic society. However, they are beginning to form a kind of cultural group, centering around the Islam. Accordingly, multicultural education needs to be rather more concrete and realistic beyond ideology. Multireligion has been of trivial issue since it has coexisted throughout our history. With Christianity introduced into Korea in modern times, there is no denying that there have existed exclusive conflicts between religions in terms of religious culture in Korea. This is not irrelevant to the exclusive attitude of our society toward the Muslim immigrants who were brought into Korea recently. This attitude is mainly due to both the Christian fundamentalism and Orientalism lurking in our heart. It is natural that tolerant coexistence be pursued so as to overcome this, but the problem is the method. Neither a specific religion's inclusivism nor relativism, which notes that both this and that may be right, serves as a solution. Here we need pluralistic attitude, through which we can alleviate conflicting situations dialectically and grope for ‘Horizontverschmelzung’ It will be made possible through multi-cultural education of coincidentia oppositorum, which is based on “dialogue of passing over and coming back.”

Abstract

Multicultural education aims to realize ‘Citizenship Education in a Global Age’ premised on the multicultural society. There is a criticism, however, that Korea is not to be considered a multicultural society since it does not constitute a multiethnic society in a strict sense. Accordingly, multicultural education cannot but be ideological as well since it borrows ideas and theories intactly from the West, whose situation is quite different from ours. Given the fact, however, that the Muslims are increasing, the assertion of Korea‘s multiculturalism being ideological is not appropriate. The Muslims come from a number of different countries and are yet too small in number to form an ethnic society. However, they are beginning to form a kind of cultural group, centering around the Islam. Accordingly, multicultural education needs to be rather more concrete and realistic beyond ideology. Multireligion has been of trivial issue since it has coexisted throughout our history. With Christianity introduced into Korea in modern times, there is no denying that there have existed exclusive conflicts between religions in terms of religious culture in Korea. This is not irrelevant to the exclusive attitude of our society toward the Muslim immigrants who were brought into Korea recently. This attitude is mainly due to both the Christian fundamentalism and Orientalism lurking in our heart. It is natural that tolerant coexistence be pursued so as to overcome this, but the problem is the method. Neither a specific religion's inclusivism nor relativism, which notes that both this and that may be right, serves as a solution. Here we need pluralistic attitude, through which we can alleviate conflicting situations dialectically and grope for ‘Horizontverschmelzung’ It will be made possible through multi-cultural education of coincidentia oppositorum, which is based on “dialogue of passing over and coming back.”

참고문헌 (23)

  1. 김광식, "토착화신학의 연속성과 일관성", 한국문화신학회 논문집, 13, pp.11~24 (2009)
  2. 김중순, "다문화교육에 있어서 종교의 문제: 특히 이슬람을 중심으로", 언어와 문화, 6(2), pp.93~115 (2010), 한국언어문화교육학회
  3. 김효정, "한국이주 남아시아 무슬림의 현황과 집단화 -남아시아 무슬림의 에스닉 집단화에 관한 연구-", 한국이슬람학회논총, 18(3), pp.105~146 (2008), 한국이슬람학회
  4. 새뮤얼 헌팅턴, "새뮤얼 헌팅턴의 미국" (2004), 김영사
  5. 신광철, "다문화사회와 종교", 종교연구, (59), pp.1~16 (2010), 한국종교학회
  6. 유동식, "한국무교의 역사와 구조" (1989), 연세대학교출판부
  7. 윤이흠, "한국종교연구" (2000), 집문당
  8. 이희수, "이슬람" (2011), 청아출판사
  9. 임재해, "『골계전』 설화의 다문화 읽기와 다문화 사회 만들기", 구비문학연구, (26), pp.29~73 (2008), 한국구비문학회
  10. 임재해, "다문화사회의 재인식과 민속문화의 다문화주의 기능", 비교민속학, (47), pp.153~211 (2012), 비교민속학회[DOI]
  11. 조셉 캠벨, "천의 얼굴을 가진 영웅" (2004), 민음사
  12. 조희선, "한국 무슬림 정착에 종교커뮤니티가 중요한 역할", 크리스챤투데이, ~ (2010)
  13. 지종화, "다문화 사회와 한국무슬림의 적응과 대응", 한국이슬람학회논총, 21(2), pp.55~98 (2011), 한국이슬람학회
  14. 홍기영, "종교다원주의 사회 속에서 비판적 상황화를 통한 효과적인 교차문화적 선교", 한국기독교신학논총, 28(41), pp.283~322 (2005), 한국기독교학회
  15. Ankerl, Guy, "Coexisting contemporary civilizations: Arabo-Muslim, Bharati, Chinese, and Western Geneva: Global Communication without Universal Civilization. INU Societal Research. vol. 1" (2000), INU Press
  16. Banks, J., "Diversity, Group Identity and Citizenship Education in a Global Age", Educational Researcher, 37(3) (2008)
  17. Dunne, John S., "The Way of All the Earth", pp.IX~ (1982), Macmillan
  18. Fischer, M. F., "The Foundation of Karl Rahner: A Paraphrase of The Foundation of Christian Faith" (2005), Crossroad
  19. Griener, G. E., "Ernst Troeltsch and Liberal Theology, In Theological Studies", pp.422~446 (2003)
  20. Kymlicka, Will, "Multiculturalism : Success, Failure, and the Future. Transatlantic Council of Migration" (2012), Migration Policy Institute
  21. Krister, Stendahl, "Meanings : The Bible as Document and as Guide" (1984), Fortress
  22. Kueng, Hans, "On Being a Christian" (1977), Collins
  23. Wood, Phil, "The Intercultural City: planning for diversity advantage" (2008), Earthscan

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)