연결어미 ‘-으면’과 ‘-다면’의 비교 분석 연구
A comparative analysis of connective ending ‘-eumyeon’ and ‘-damyeon’
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to describe in more detail the semantic differences between the two forms by making a comparative analysis of the connective ending '-eumyeon' and '-damyeon'. '-eumyeon' and '-damyeon' can be interchange with each other in various situations. From this, it can be assumed that some of the semantic areas of the two forms overlap, but the semantic areas of the two are not completely the same. Therefore, We would like to compare '-eumyeon' and '-damyeon' to examine what kind of semantic difference there is. In chapter 2, The syntactic·morphological characteristics of '-eumyeon' and '-damyeon' are summarized. In addition, we looked at ‘-dago hamyeon’ as indirect quotation phrase. In chapter 3, The semantic characteristics of '-eumyeon' and '-damyeon' are summarized. In this process, the meaning of using 'conditional' and 'hypothetical' within this study was defined. This is because there is a problem that 'conditional' and 'hypothetical' are not defined as accurate academic terms despite their general use in Korean linguistics. Lastly, in Chapter 4, We compared sentences with the same structure in which '-eumyeon' and '-damyeon' to examine what implications were revealed.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to describe in more detail the semantic differences between the two forms by making a comparative analysis of the connective ending '-eumyeon' and '-damyeon'. '-eumyeon' and '-damyeon' can be interchange with each other in various situations. From this, it can be assumed that some of the semantic areas of the two forms overlap, but the semantic areas of the two are not completely the same. Therefore, We would like to compare '-eumyeon' and '-damyeon' to examine what kind of semantic difference there is. In chapter 2, The syntactic·morphological characteristics of '-eumyeon' and '-damyeon' are summarized. In addition, we looked at ‘-dago hamyeon’ as indirect quotation phrase. In chapter 3, The semantic characteristics of '-eumyeon' and '-damyeon' are summarized. In this process, the meaning of using 'conditional' and 'hypothetical' within this study was defined. This is because there is a problem that 'conditional' and 'hypothetical' are not defined as accurate academic terms despite their general use in Korean linguistics. Lastly, in Chapter 4, We compared sentences with the same structure in which '-eumyeon' and '-damyeon' to examine what implications were revealed.
참고문헌 (20)
- 김문기, "‘-으면’과 ‘-다면’의 연구 방법에 대한 제언", 한국민족문화, (78), pp.3~39 (2021), 한국민족문화연구소[DOI]
- 김수정, "‘-면’ 조건문의 유형과 시제", 언어, 43(2), pp.201~221 (2018), 한국언어학회[DOI]
- 김진수, "가정 조건문과 원인 이유문 고찰", 어문연구, 12, pp.71~98 (1983), 어문연구회
- 김진수, "국어 접속어미의 분류", 언어연구, 6, pp.79~99 (1989), 한국현대언어학회
- 명정희, "접속어미 ‘-으면’의 의미와 시제 해석", 한국어학, 67, pp.105~146 (2015), 한국어학회
- 박나리, "사실조건의 ‘-면’에 대한 담화 화용적 연구-형태 통사적 의미기능과의 유기적 상관성을 중심으로-", 國語學, (68), pp.289~321 (2013), 국어학회[DOI]
- 박승윤, "국어의 조건문에 관하여", 언어, 13(1), pp.1~14 (1988), 한국언어학회
- 박유경, "조건 연결어미 ‘-다면’의 용법", 한국어 의미학, 50, pp.45~68 (2015), 한국어의미학회[DOI]
- 박재연, "연결어미와 양태 : 이유, 조건, 양보의 연결어미를 중심으로", 한국어 의미학, 30, pp.119~141 (2009), 한국어의미학회
- 박재연, "한국어 연결어미 의미 확장에서의 환유와 은유", 國語學, (70), pp.117~155 (2014), 국어학회[DOI]
- 박정운, "한국어 조건문의 인식태도", 담화와 인지, 13(2), pp.109~132 (2006), 담화·인지언어학회
- 윤평현, "현대국어 접속어미 연구" (2005), 박이정
- 이관호, "접속어미 「-면」의 의미기능과 그 상관성", 언어, 5(2), pp.33~65 (1980), 한국언어학회
- 이금희, "인용문 형식의 문법화？문법화 과정과 문법화 정도에 대하여", 國語學, (48), pp.233~258 (2006), 국어학회
- 이금희, "‘－다고’류 연결어미의 문법화와 의미 기능에 대하여", 國語學, (104), pp.157~190 (2022), 국어학회[DOI]
- 이은경, "배경·이유·조건·양보 접속문의 시제 표현", 진단학보, (123), pp.145~171 (2015), 진단학회
- 장경희, "국어 접속 어미의 의미 구조", 한글, 227, pp.151~174 (1995), 한글학회
- Noh, Eun-Ju, "The Korean conditional markers myen and tamyen - epistemicity modes of language use", Journal of East Aisan Linguistics, 18, pp.21~39 (2009)
- Palmer, F. R., "Mood and Modality" (2001), Cambridge university press
- Sweetser, E., "From etymology to pragmatics" (1990), Cambridge Univ. Press