한국어 문법 교육을 위한 용례 작성의 원리 연구
Contemplation on Principle of Writing Example Sentences for Korean Grammar Teaching and Learning
1
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aimed to invent a principle of creating example sentences based on considerations given to the functions of examples in the processes of grammar learning and teaching. To that end, the functions of grammar examples were considered through the literature review in terms of understanding, use, and content. This stage was followed by the establishment of standards for analyzing the appropriateness of the examples. The appropriateness of the examples in the Korean language class materials was analyzed against the standards, and the principle of creating example sentences was achieved inductively. The inductive results delivered in specific statements are as follows. From the perspective of grammar and understanding, example sentences should: ①be appropriate against the target-grammar meaning and usage; ②present various syntactic patterns of the target grammar; ③clearly present the context in which the target-grammar items were used; ④ensure the grammar and vocabulary used in the examples have been fine-tuned to the levels of learners’ grammar and vocabulary abilities; and ⑤be based on examples that are hierarchically arranged. From the viewpoint of usage, the identified principle-statements were: ⑥Example-sentences should allow instant applications to real-life communication, along with ❸; From the viewpoint of content, ⑦the sentences should contain accurate information in terms of content; and ⑧the sentences should be devoid of any biases or stereotypes regarding particular countries, gender, occupation, etc.
Abstract
This study aimed to invent a principle of creating example sentences based on considerations given to the functions of examples in the processes of grammar learning and teaching. To that end, the functions of grammar examples were considered through the literature review in terms of understanding, use, and content. This stage was followed by the establishment of standards for analyzing the appropriateness of the examples. The appropriateness of the examples in the Korean language class materials was analyzed against the standards, and the principle of creating example sentences was achieved inductively. The inductive results delivered in specific statements are as follows. From the perspective of grammar and understanding, example sentences should: ①be appropriate against the target-grammar meaning and usage; ②present various syntactic patterns of the target grammar; ③clearly present the context in which the target-grammar items were used; ④ensure the grammar and vocabulary used in the examples have been fine-tuned to the levels of learners’ grammar and vocabulary abilities; and ⑤be based on examples that are hierarchically arranged. From the viewpoint of usage, the identified principle-statements were: ⑥Example-sentences should allow instant applications to real-life communication, along with ❸; From the viewpoint of content, ⑦the sentences should contain accurate information in terms of content; and ⑧the sentences should be devoid of any biases or stereotypes regarding particular countries, gender, occupation, etc.
참고문헌 (34)
- 김경, "독일어 학습사전에서 용례 정보 정교화를 위한 연구", 독어교육, 65(65), pp.7~29 (2016), 한국독어독문학교육학회
- 김근택, "사전 용례에 관한 연구", 불어불문학연구, 34(2), pp.703~722 (1997), 한국불어불문학회
- 김인규, "한국어 교사를 대상으로 한 교육용 문법서활용 현황 및 개선 요구 조사", 동악어문학, (63), pp.443~484 (2014), 동악어문학회
- 한국어 교육 문법·표현 내용 개발 연구 : 1단계, "김호정", 국립국어원, ~ (2012)
- 양재승, "한국어 통합 교재의 문법 예문 작성 원칙 연구", 한국어교육, 28(1), pp.197~220 (2017), 국제한국어교육학회[DOI]
- 원미진, "한국어 학습자 사전의 용례 기술 방법에 대한 연구", 한국사전학, (18), pp.154~175 (2011), 한국사전학회
- 이윤진, "유사 담화 기능의 문형 제시 연구－한국어 교재의 ‘용례’를 중심으로－", 한국어교육, 20(2), pp.151~173 (2009), 국제한국어교육학회
- 이익환, "국어 사전의 뜻풀이와 용례", 새국어생활, 2(1), pp.30~54 (1992), 국립국어연구원
- 정선화, "한국어 문법서 기술 방식에 관한 교사 인식 및 선호도 연구", 우리어문연구, (49), pp.353~386 (2014), 우리어문학회
- 홍종선, "국어 사전의 성과와 과제(6): 용례 -언어의 이해와 표현에 기여하는 사전의 편찬을 위하여-", 어문논집, (61), pp.291~314 (2010), 민족어문학회
- Drysdale, P, "The dictionary and the language learner", pp.212~223 (1987), Niemeyer
- Langacker, R. W, "인지문법" (2014), 박이정
- Laufer, B, "Practical lexicography : a reader", pp.213~218 (2008), Oxford University Press
- Fontenelle, T., "Practical lexicography : a reader", pp.213~218 (2008), Oxford University Press
- Svensén, B., "A Handbook of Lexicography: The Theory and Practice of Dictionary‐Making" (2009), Cambridge University Press
- Yong, H., "Bilingual lexicography from a communicative perspective" (2007), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- 고려대학교 한국어문화교육센터, "재미있는 한국어1" (2008), 교보문고
- 고려대학교 한국어문화교육센터, "재미있는 한국어2" (2009), 교보문고
- 고려대학교 한국어문화교육센터, "재미있는 한국어3" (2010), 교보문고
- 고려대학교 한국어문화교육센터, "재미있는 한국어4" (2010), 교보문고
- 고려대학교 한국어문화교육센터, "재미있는 한국어5" (2010), 교보문고
- 고려대학교 한국어문화교육센터, "재미있는 한국어6" (2010), 교보문고
- 1B, "서울대 한국어1A", pp.2013, 서울대학교 언어교육원
- 2B, "서울대 한국어2A", pp.2013, 서울대학교 언어교육원
- 3B, "서울대 한국어3A", pp.2015, 서울대학교 언어교육원
- 4B, "서울대 한국어4A", pp.2015, 서울대학교 언어교육원
- 5B, "서울대 한국어5A", pp.2012, 서울대학교 언어교육원
- 6B, "서울대 한국어6A", pp.2015, 서울대학교 언어교육원
- 1-2, "연세 한국어1-1", pp.2013, 연세대학교 한국어학당
- 2-2, "연세 한국어2-1", pp.2013, 연세대학교 한국어학당
- 3-2, "연세 한국어3-1", pp.2013, 연세대학교 한국어학당
- 4-2, "연세 한국어4-1", pp.2013, 연세대학교 한국어학당
- 5-2, "연세 한국어5-1", pp.2013, 연세대학교 한국어학당
- 6-2, "연세 한국어6-1", pp.2013, 연세대학교 한국어학당