본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

학습자 말뭉치를 기반으로 한 중국어권 한국어 학습자의 목적격 조사 오류 연구

Error Analysis of Objective Case Postpositions of Chinese Korean Learners.

1

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

The purpose of this study is to analyze the aspects and causes of errors in Chinese Korean Learners’ use of the object particle ‘eul/reul’(을/를). The research was based on a large scale learner’s corpus. The study focuses on examing the following three aspects: 1) the development of error changes according to the learners’ Korean ability, 2) the cause of errors, and 3) substitution errors due to L1 interference. Of the 2,856 objective particle errors, substitution errors consisted of about 68% of the errors. It is worth noting that as the learners’ Korean abilities increased, so too did the rate of error, while the rate of substitution errors increased at a more gradual rate as learners’ fluency increased. In the analysis of the cause of errors, the results will confirm that intrusive interlingual interference caused an increase in error rates 42% substitution errors were due to the influence of the learners’ L1. These results can be interpreted to signify that L1 interference emerges more frequently as fluency increases. In the analysis of substitution errors, the subject particle, ‘i/ga’(이/가), was used in place of the object particle ‘eul/reul’(을/를) most often; mainly in the case of particles followed directly by predicates. As for other particles that substituted the objective ‘erl/reul’(을/를), the forth meanings of ‘erl/reul’(을/를) do not have the ‘V+Obj.’ sentence structure in Chinese. This study is to serve as an explanation of Chinese Korean learners’ objective case ‘eul/reul’(을/를) errors, as well as to help in researching pedagogical methods for these learners.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the aspects and causes of errors in Chinese Korean Learners’ use of the object particle ‘eul/reul’(을/를). The research was based on a large scale learner’s corpus. The study focuses on examing the following three aspects: 1) the development of error changes according to the learners’ Korean ability, 2) the cause of errors, and 3) substitution errors due to L1 interference. Of the 2,856 objective particle errors, substitution errors consisted of about 68% of the errors. It is worth noting that as the learners’ Korean abilities increased, so too did the rate of error, while the rate of substitution errors increased at a more gradual rate as learners’ fluency increased. In the analysis of the cause of errors, the results will confirm that intrusive interlingual interference caused an increase in error rates 42% substitution errors were due to the influence of the learners’ L1. These results can be interpreted to signify that L1 interference emerges more frequently as fluency increases. In the analysis of substitution errors, the subject particle, ‘i/ga’(이/가), was used in place of the object particle ‘eul/reul’(을/를) most often; mainly in the case of particles followed directly by predicates. As for other particles that substituted the objective ‘erl/reul’(을/를), the forth meanings of ‘erl/reul’(을/를) do not have the ‘V+Obj.’ sentence structure in Chinese. This study is to serve as an explanation of Chinese Korean learners’ objective case ‘eul/reul’(을/를) errors, as well as to help in researching pedagogical methods for these learners.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. 고석주, "학습자 말뭉치에서 조사 오류의 특징", 외국어로서의 한국어교육, 27, pp.543~570 (2002), 언어연구교육원 한국어학당
  2. 곽홍란, "중국인 한국어 학습자의 글쓰기에 나타난 조사 오류-‘이", 가’, ‘을, 국제언어문학, pp.2015, 31(31)[DOI]
  3. 김의수, "중국어권 학습자 조사 습득에서의 오류와 원인 분석 -구조격 조사 ‘가’와 ‘를’의 대치 오류에 관한 생성문법적 접근-", 한국어교육, 20(2), pp.29~52 (2009), 국제한국어교육학회[DOI]
  4. 민진영, "한국어 고급 학습자의 조사 오류 분석", 석사, 한국어교육, pp.2002
  5. 박종호, "중국인 유학생의 한국어 글쓰기에 나타난 오류 유형", 언어학 연구, (24), pp.81~103 (2012), 한국중원언어학회[DOI]
  6. 쑹웨이, "중국인 초급 한국어 학습자의 글쓰기에 나타난 조사 오류 양상과 지도 방안 연구 - ‘이", 가’, ‘을, 작문연구, pp.2018, (38)[DOI]
  7. 원해영, "한국어 학습자의 조사 오류 화석화 현상 연구 - 고급 단계 학습자의 작문 분석을 통해 -", 우리말연구, (44), pp.221~250 (2016), 우리말학회[DOI]
  8. 전영옥, "여성결혼이민자의 한국어 조사 오류 분석", 한국어교육, 22(4), pp.27~62 (2011), 국제한국어교육학회[DOI]
  9. 한국어 학습자의 오류 유형 조사 연구, "조철현", 문화관광부, ~ (2002)
  10. 장정란, "중국어권 학습자의 조사 대치 오류 분석", 석사, pp.2015
  11. 한상미, "고급 한국어 학습자의 토론 담화에 나타난 조사 오류 양상 분석", 이중언어학, (57), pp.223~255 (2014), 이중언어학회[DOI]
  12. 한명숙, "영어 화자가 생성한 한국어 문장의 조사 오류 사례와 한국어교육의 과제", 새국어교육, (103), pp.255~281 (2015), 한국국어교육학회[DOI]
  13. 허용, "대조언어학" (2013), 소통
  14. Corder, S. P, "The Significance of Learner’s Errors", International Review of Applied Linguistics, 5, pp.161~169 (1967)
  15. Sylviane Granger, "Introduction: Learner corpus research - past, present and future: The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Rearch", pp.1~5 (2015), Cambridge University Press
  16. Lado, R, "Linguistics Aross Culture" (1957), University of Michigan
  17. McEnery, T, "Corpus-based Language Studies: An Advanced Resource Book" (2006), Routledge

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)