유학생 대상 한국어 교재 분석 연구 -문법 항목을 중심으로 -
An Analysis on Korean Textbooks for Academic Purpose - focused on grammar -
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims to diagnose the current status of grammar teaching and learning for academic purpose learners. To that end, an analysis on grammatical chunks presented in Korean textbooks for academic purposes were conducted. The analysis of Korean textbooks for academic purposes was done in terms of form, genre and function. The result appeared that the proportion of sentence composition, including slots in which certain vocabulary, phrases, and clauses can be inserted in terms of form, was overwhelmingly high, followed by the proportion of commonly used idiomatic expressions. On the other hand, the proportion of grammatical morpheme or composition of morpheme, which were relatively high in the regular Korean language curriculum, was very low. In the distribution of grammatical items by genre, there were five different genres of spoken language: lectures, interviews, presentations, debates, and discussions, while written language was limited to academic reports. In addition, discussions and interviews were limited to specific textbooks, unlike those that had many lectures, presentations, and debates in common in many textbooks.
Abstract
This study aims to diagnose the current status of grammar teaching and learning for academic purpose learners. To that end, an analysis on grammatical chunks presented in Korean textbooks for academic purposes were conducted. The analysis of Korean textbooks for academic purposes was done in terms of form, genre and function. The result appeared that the proportion of sentence composition, including slots in which certain vocabulary, phrases, and clauses can be inserted in terms of form, was overwhelmingly high, followed by the proportion of commonly used idiomatic expressions. On the other hand, the proportion of grammatical morpheme or composition of morpheme, which were relatively high in the regular Korean language curriculum, was very low. In the distribution of grammatical items by genre, there were five different genres of spoken language: lectures, interviews, presentations, debates, and discussions, while written language was limited to academic reports. In addition, discussions and interviews were limited to specific textbooks, unlike those that had many lectures, presentations, and debates in common in many textbooks.
참고문헌 (13)
- 강현화, "한국어 교재의 문형유형 분석", 한국어교육, 18(1), pp.1~21 (2007), 국제한국어교육학회[DOI]
- 강현화, "어휘접근적 문법교수를 위한 표현문형의 화행기능 분석 -‘-어야 하다", 되다’를 사례로-, 2008, pp.26, 21~46[DOI]
- 고경태, "한국어 동사 교육 연구 : 동사의 통사 및 의미 교육을 위한 패턴(pattern) 선정을 중심으로", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.2008
- 구재희, "한국어 기본문형 교육 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.2007
- 김영진, "한국어 학습자의 덩이표현 사용 양상 연구", 석사, 한국어교육, pp.2007
- 민현식, "문법 교육의 표준화와 다양화의 과제", 제7회 한국어교육 국제학술대회 자료집, pp.13~63 (2005), 서울대학교 국어교육연구소
- 서희정, "표현 항목의 선정 기준과 정도성", 고황논집, 42, pp.33~51 (2008), 경희대학교 대학원
- 서희정, "한국어교육을 위한 복합형식 연구", 박사, 한국어교육, pp.2009
- 이미혜, "한국어 문법 교육에서 ‘표현항목’ 설정에 대한 연구", 한국어교육, 13(2), pp.205~225 (2002), 국제한국어교육학회
- 장미라, "문장 구조 중심의 한국어 교육 연구", 박사, 국어학, pp.2008
- 최윤곤, "한국어 ‘표현 범주’의 개념과 유형", 새국어교육, (83), pp.583~608 (2009), 한국국어교육학회[DOI]
- 홍윤혜, "학술적 문어담화와 구어담화의 장르 비교 분석 - 연구 논문과 연구 발표의 수사적 행위 요소를 중심으로", 박사, pp.2014
- Thornbury, S., "How to teach grammar" (1999), Pearson Education Limited