중국어권 한국어 학습자의 부정극어 사용 양상 연구-빈도 효과를 중심으로-
Study on Chinese-L1 Learners' Acquisition of Korean Negative Polarity Items: Focusing on Frequency Effect
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study intends to verify the frequency effect in Chinese-L2 Korean language learners' use of Korean adverb negative polarities. The frequency of native Korean speakers' use of adverb negative polarities was used as the input frequency, and the frequency and usage patterns of adverb negative polarities were explored by examining learner corpus. The result may be quadruple. First, learners made extensive use of adverbial negative polarities with a high input frequency, particularly those occurring more than once every 10,000 phonological words. Second, there was a strong link between the input and output frequencies of negative polarity constructions, indicating the frequency effect regarding the use of the construction. Third, the learners were more sensitive to, and showed more frequent use of, higher-frequency `negative polarities+negative expression' constructions. However, the use of high-frequency negative polarity constructions grew significantly from the beginning to the intermediate level, while the growth was less pronounced between the intermediate and advance levels. This outcome is consistent with `the power law of learning'. Finally, the use of negative polarity adverbs by Chinese-L1 learners was demonstrated to be influenced by their L1 Chinese. This indicates that the frequency alone cannot fully explain the learner's negative polarity use, highlighting the need to take learners' L1 into account.
Abstract
This study intends to verify the frequency effect in Chinese-L2 Korean language learners' use of Korean adverb negative polarities. The frequency of native Korean speakers' use of adverb negative polarities was used as the input frequency, and the frequency and usage patterns of adverb negative polarities were explored by examining learner corpus. The result may be quadruple. First, learners made extensive use of adverbial negative polarities with a high input frequency, particularly those occurring more than once every 10,000 phonological words. Second, there was a strong link between the input and output frequencies of negative polarity constructions, indicating the frequency effect regarding the use of the construction. Third, the learners were more sensitive to, and showed more frequent use of, higher-frequency `negative polarities+negative expression' constructions. However, the use of high-frequency negative polarity constructions grew significantly from the beginning to the intermediate level, while the growth was less pronounced between the intermediate and advance levels. This outcome is consistent with `the power law of learning'. Finally, the use of negative polarity adverbs by Chinese-L1 learners was demonstrated to be influenced by their L1 Chinese. This indicates that the frequency alone cannot fully explain the learner's negative polarity use, highlighting the need to take learners' L1 into account.
참고문헌 (33)
- 구종남, "국어 부정극어의 유형", 국어문학, 38, pp.5~27 (2003), 국어문학회
- 국립국어원, "2021년 한국어 학습자 말뭉치 연구 및 구축 사업" (2022), 국립국어원
- 김영희, "한국어 통사 현상이 의미" (2005), 역락
- 류기수, "중국어 학교 문법" (2000), 컴리빙닷컴
- 송국경, "한국어 부정극어 부사의 중국어 대응 표현 연구 : 소극적 부정극어와 적극적 부정극어를 대상으로", 석사, 국어국문학과, pp.2014
- 시정곤, "국어의 부정극어에 대한 연구", 국어국문학, (119), pp.49~78 (1997), 국어국문학회
- 오상언, "한·중 부정극어 대조 연구", 박사, pp.2015
- 이원아, "부정성 부사에 대한 한국어 교육학적 연구", 석사, 국어국문학과, pp.2012
- 임유종, "부정소 호응 부사에 의한 연어와 사전 기술", 한국언어문화, (27), pp.235~256 (2005), 한국언어문화학회
- 임유종, "부정 표현과 호응하는 부사의 사용 양상과 한국어 교육", 한민족문화연구, (20), pp.187~214 (2007), 한민족문화학회[DOI]
- 전호, "한국어와 중국어 부정극어 비교연구: 소설 『四世同堂(사세동당)』을 중심으로", 석사, pp.2022
- 조용준, "중국인 학습자의 한국어 호응 부사 습득 양상", 우리말글, 69, pp.121~153 (2016), 우리말글학회[DOI]
- 주정정, "중국어권 한국어 학습자의 연어 사용 연구", 박사, pp.2021
- 최형연, "중국인 한국어 학습자의 호응 부사 습득 연구", 석사, pp.2015
- 하지경, "한국어 부정 극어와 부정소의 호응 양상 연구", 석사, 외국어로서의한국어교육, pp.2009
- 한송화, "중국어권 한국어 학습자의 부사 사용에 대한 연구", 언어사실과 관점, 48, pp.33~59 (2019), 언어정보연구원[DOI]
- XIE FANFAN, "중국인 학생을 위한 한국어 부정극어의 교육 연구", 석사, pp.2018
- Chen, C., "The effects of repetition and L1 lexicalization on incidental vocabulary acquisition", Applied linguistics, 31(5), pp.693~713 (2010)
- DeKeyser, R., "Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction" (2020), Routledge
- Ellis, N. C., "Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), pp.143~188 (2002)
- Ellis, N. C., "Reflections on frequency effects in language processing", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), pp.297~339 (2002)
- Ellis, N. C., "The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition", pp.193~210 (2012), Routledge
- Ellis, N. C., "Construction Learning as a function of Frequency, Frequency Distribution, and Function", Modern Language Journal, 93(3), pp.370~386 (2009)
- Ellis, N. C., "Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction" (2020), Routledge
- Goldschneider, J. M., "Explaining the “natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition” in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants", Language learning, 51(1), pp.1~50 (2001)
- Jensen, E. D., "Exact Repetition as Input Enhancement in Second Language Acquisition", Language Learning, 53(3), pp.373~428 (2003)
- Krashen, S. D., "The input hypothesis: issues and implications" (1985), Longman
- Larsen-Freeman, D. E., "An explanation for the morpheme acquisition order of second language learners", Language Learning, 26(1), pp.125~134 (1976)
- Perin, D., "Repetition and Information Writing of Development Students", Journal of Developmental Education, 26(1), pp.2~7 (2002)
- Shirai, Y., "Connectionism and second language acquisition" (2018), Routledge
- Webb, S., "The effects ofrepetition on vocabulary knowledge", Applied Linguistics, 28, pp.46~65 (2007)
- Wolter, B., "Frequency of input and L2 collocational processing : A comparison of congruent and incongruent collocations", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(3), pp.451~482 (2013)
- Wulff, S., "The acquisition of tense-aspect : Converging evidence from corpora and telicity ratings", The Modern Language Journal, 93(3), pp.354~369 (2009)